Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to baseline status: subset analyses of the phase III Sorafenib Asia-Pacific trial.

BACKGROUND: The phase III Sorafenib Asia-Pacific (AP) trial-conducted in China, Taiwan and South Korea - confirmed that sorafenib improves overall survival (OS) and is safe for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a series of exploratory subset analyses to determine whether baseline status affected response to sorafenib. METHODS: In the Sorafenib AP trial, 226 patients with well-preserved liver function (>95% Child-Pugh A) were randomised 2:1 to sorafenib 400mg bid or matching placebo. Subanalyses were based on aetiology (hepatitis B virus present/absent); tumour burden (macroscopic vascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread present/absent); presence or absence of either lung or lymph node metastasis at baseline, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0, 1-2); serum concentrations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (normal, mildly elevated, moderately elevated), alpha-fetoprotein (normal/elevated) and total bilirubin (normal/elevated); and whether or not there was a history of hepatectomy or transarterial chemoembolisation/embolisation. Subgroup assessments included OS, time to progression (TTP), disease control rate and safety. FINDINGS: Sorafenib consistently improved both median OS and median TTP, compared with placebo (range of hazard ratios (HR), 0.32-0.87 and 0.31-0.75, respectively). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhoea and fatigue, the incidence of which was similar between subgroups. INTERPRETATION: The efficacy and safety profiles of sorafenib in the subpopulations described were comparable with those in the overall study population. These exploratory analyses suggest that sorafenib is effective for patients from the AP region with advanced HCC, irrespective of baseline status.

One patient with metastastic colorectal cancer successfully treated by combination of targeted agents after failure of chemotherapy.

Either cetuximab or bevacizumab can improve the survival of patients with metastastic colorectal cancer (mCRC) if administered combided with cytotoxic agents. However, the effect of two or more target agents in combination is uncertain in these patients. Here, we reported a patient with mCRC successfully treated by a combination of target agents after the failure of chemotherapy. The patient received palliative resection of primary tumor followed by 9 cycles of postoperative XELOX regimen, cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK)-based biotherapy, traditional Chinese medicine, particle implantation in the lung metastatic lesions. The tumor progressed 20 months after the standard treatments. Then, the regimen cetuximab, bevacizumab and cefitinib was applied. During the treatment with targeted agents, grade IV acne-like rash and relatively severe parionychia of the toes occurred. Both of them recovered smoothly. The PET-CT reexamination at 40 days after the target treatment showed that the metabolism of mediastinal lymph nodes basically recovered to a normal level. The combination of multiple targeted agents obtained a progression-free survival(PFS) of 11 months and the patient with a good quality of life during this period.

[Preclinical study of apoptosis of B-NHL cell lines induced by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody].

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (McAb) on induction of apoptosis in malignant B cell lines in vitro and to explore its possible mechanism. The human Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines (Daudi, Namalwa, Raji and Ramos cells) were cultured in vitro. The inhibitory rate of cell proliferation was detected by XTT assay, the apoptosis of cells was determined by flow cytometry. The expression of BCL-2 in human Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines (Daudi, Namalwa, Raji and Ramos cells) treated with rituximab (20 microg/ml) for 24 hours was analyzed by Western blot. The results showed that the anti-CD20 McAb had a slight anti-proliferation effect on the Daudi, Namalwa, Raji cell lines and no effect on the Ramos cell line. There is no correlation between the effect and the concentration of anti-CD20 McAb. Anti-CD20 McAb as a single agent could weakly induce the apoptosis of four cell lines. The inhibitory rate of cell proliferation ranged from 3% to 10%. Expression of BCL-2 protein was down-regulated after treated by anti-CD20 McAb for 24 hours in Raji and Namalwa cell lines. It is concluded that the anti-CD20 McAb as a monomer can slightly inhibit the proliferation of Daudi, Namalwa and Raji cell lines, the inhibition does not dependent on the treating time and the concentrations of anti-CD20 McAb. Anti-CD20 McAb as a monomer can weakly induce the apoptosis of four cell lines. Expression of BCL-2 in Raji and Namalwa cell lines is down-regulated after the cells were treated by anti-CD20 McAb for 24 hours. Down-regulation of BCL-2 expression may be one of the mechanisms enhancing the cytotoxicity of cytotoxic drugs.

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Most cases of hepatocellular carcinoma occur in the Asia-Pacific region, where chronic hepatitis B infection is an important aetiological factor. Assessing the efficacy and safety of new therapeutic options in an Asia-Pacific population is thus important. We did a multinational phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients from the Asia-Pacific region with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Between Sept 20, 2005, and Jan 31, 2007, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic therapy and had Child-Pugh liver function class A, were randomly assigned to receive either oral sorafenib (400 mg) or placebo twice daily in 6-week cycles, with efficacy measured at the end of each 6-week period. Eligible patients were stratified by the presence or absence of macroscopic vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread (or both), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and geographical region. Randomisation was done centrally and in a 2:1 ratio by means of an interactive voice-response system. There was no predefined primary endpoint; overall survival, time to progression (TTP), time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were assessed. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00492752. FINDINGS: 271 patients from 23 centres in China, South Korea, and Taiwan were enrolled in the study. Of these, 226 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=150) or to the placebo group (n=76). Median overall survival was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.56-7.56) in patients treated with sorafenib, compared with 4.2 months (3.75-5.46) in those who received placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68 [95% CI 0.50-0.93]; p=0.014). Median TTP was 2.8 months (2.63-3.58) in the sorafenib group compared with 1.4 months (1.35-1.55) in the placebo group (HR 0.57 [0.42-0.79]; p=0.0005). The most frequently reported grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events in the 149 assessable patients treated with sorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR; 16 patients [10.7%]), diarrhoea (nine patients [6.0%]), and fatigue (five patients [3.4%]). The most common adverse events resulting in dose reductions were HFSR (17 patients [11.4%]) and diarrhoea (11 patients [7.4%]); these adverse events rarely led to discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: Sorafenib is effective for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in patients from the Asia-Pacific region, and is well tolerated. Taken together with data from the Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomised Protocol (SHARP) trial, sorafenib seems to be an appropriate option for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

[Phase III randomized clinical trial of intratumoral injection of E1B gene-deleted adenovirus (H101) combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in treating squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: H101 is an E1B-55 kDa gene-deleted replication-selective adenovirus, which showed a significant antitumor activity. This study was to compare effects and toxicities of intratumoral H101 injection combined with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) regimen or adriamycin plus 5-fluorouracil (AF) regimen versus PF or AF regimen alone in treating patients with head and neck or esophagus squamous cell cancer. METHODS: A total of 160 patients were recruited. PF regimen (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients have no history of PF chemotherapy,or sensitive to PF chemotherapy,while AF regimen (adriamycin 50 mg/m(2) iv,d1; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients didn't response to PF regimen. All patients were randomized to either receive intratumoral H101 injection (5.0 x 10(11)-1.5 x 10(12) VP/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks) or not. Treatment repeated every 3 weeks,all patients have to receive at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 123 accordant patients,overall response rate of PF plus H101 group (group A1) was 78.8% (41/52),of PF alone group (group B1) was 39.6% (21/53),of AF plus H101 group (group A2) was 50.0% (7/14),of AF alone group (group B2) was 50.0% (2/4). Differences of response rates between group A1 and group B1,between group A1+A2 and group B1+B2 were significant (P=0.000). Main side effects were fever (45.7%), injection site reaction (28.3%),and influenza-like symptoms (9.8%). CONCLUSION: Intratumoral H101 injection showed a distinct efficacy in patients with squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus,and was relatively safe.

[Phase II clinical study of intratumoral H101, an E1B deleted adenovirus, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with cancer].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: In recent years,great development have been made in cancer therapeutics with replication-competent viruses (oncolytic viruses), E1B deleted adenovirus is one of promising viruses. The current study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intratumoral H101, a E1B-deleted adenovirus, in combination with chemotherapy on patients with cancer. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with malignant tumors in multiple centers clinical trial were treated with H101, 0.5ml 5x10(11) viral particle per day for 5 consecutive days every three weeks. Routine chemotherapy was performed at the same time. And the efficacy and toxicity were recorded. RESULTS: Among 46 valuable cases, the overall response rate was 30.4%. The response rate was 28.0% (14/50) among ITT population, including 3 complete response (CR) and 11 partial response (PR). The overall response rate of control lesion was 13.0%, including 1 case of CR and 5 cases of PR. Thus, the response rate in injected lesion is clearly higher than that in control lesion (P< 0.001). Main side effects were injection site pain (26.9%) and fever (30.2%). Grade 1 hepatic dysfunction was found in 4 patients, grade 2 in 1 patients, grade 4 in 1 patients. Grade 4 hematological toxicities were found in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: The study showed that the combination of genetically modified adenovirus (H101) and chemotherapy possessed some effect for treating the patients with refractory malignant tumors, and the toxicities were lower, well tolerated.