Antidepressant and anxiolytic potential of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) assessed by behavioural and neurogenesis outcomes in mice.

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) is an investigational novel antidepressant with multimodal activity that functions as a 5-HT3, 5-HT7 and 5-HT(1D) receptor antagonist, 5-HT(1B) receptor partial agonist, 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist and inhibitor of the 5-HT transporter in vitro. Here we explore its anxiolytic and antidepressant potential in adult mice. Vortioxetine was assessed in BalB/cJ@RJ mice using the open-field and forced-swim tests (acute: p.o. 1 h, repeated: daily p.o. 21 days), and in 129S6/SvEvTac mice using the novelty suppressed feeding paradigm (acute: p.o. 1 h, sustained: daily p.o. 14 or 21 days). Fluoxetine and diazepam were controls. Acute and repeated dosing of vortioxetine produced more pronounced anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like activities than fluoxetine. Vortioxetine significantly increased cell proliferation and cell survival and stimulated maturation of immature granule cells in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus after 21 days of treatment. After 14 days, a high dose of vortioxetine increased dendritic length and the number of dendrite intersections, suggesting that vortioxetine accelerates the maturation of immature neurons. Vortioxetine displays an antidepressant and anxiolytic profile following repeated administration associated with increased neurogenesis at several stages. Vortioxetine effects were observed at low levels of 5-HT transporter occupancy, suggesting an alternative mechanism of action to 5-HT reuptake inhibition.

Characterization of the electrophysiological properties of triple reuptake inhibitors on monoaminergic neurons.

Triple reuptake inhibitors represent a potential new class of antidepressant drugs that block norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA) and serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] transporters. The present in-vivo electrophysiological study was undertaken to determine the effects of the triple reuptake inhibitors SEP-225289 and DOV216303 on the neuronal activities of locus coeruleus (LC) NE, ventral tegmental area (VTA) DA and dorsal raphe (DR) 5-HT neurons. Administered acutely, SEP-225289 and DOV216303 dose-dependently decreased the spontaneous firing rate of LC NE, VTA DA and DR 5-HT neurons through the activation of α2, D2 and 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors, respectively. Both compounds predominantly inhibited the firing rate of LC NE neurons while producing only a partial decrease in VTA DA and DR 5-HT neuronal discharge. SEP-225289 was equipotent at inhibiting 5-HT and NE transporters since it prolonged to the same extent the time required for a 50% recovery (RT50) of the firing activity of dorsal hippocampus CA3 pyramidal neurons from the inhibition induced by microiontophoretic application of 5-HT and NE. Finally, in the presence of WAY100635, a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, SEP-225289 activated 5-HT neurons at doses that normally did not inhibit them. Taken together, the present results indicate that reciprocal interactions among NE, DA and 5-HT inputs need to be considered to anticipate the net effect of triple reuptake inhibitors on the enhancement of brain monoamine transmission. The results also suggest that the therapeutic action of triple reuptake inhibitors may be potentiated by antagonizing the cell body 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors.

Effects of acute and sustained administration of the catecholamine reuptake inhibitor nomifensine on the firing activity of monoaminergic neurons.

Nomifensine potently inhibits the reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine in vitro. It is one of few antidepressants with marked potency to block dopamine reuptake that has ever been used clinically. Acute and sustained administration of nomifensine was investigated on the firing of monoaminergic neurons to understand its mechanism of action. In vivo extracellular recordings of locus coeruleus, ventral tegmental area and dorsal raphe nucleus neurons were obtained from male Sprague-Dawley rats. The intravenous injection of nomifensine in the locus coeruleus and ventral tegmental area yielded ED(50) values of 40 +/- 1 and 450 +/- 41 microg/kg, respectively, suggesting that nomifensine directly acted upon dopamine and norepinephrine neurons, since these values are proportional to its affinities for norepinephrine and dopamine transporters. There was no effect on 5-HT neurons. Nomifensine (5 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous, using minipumps) potently and significantly inhibited dopamine neuronal firing in the ventral tegmental area after 2 days, with recovery to normal after the 14-day treatment due to D(2) autoreceptor desensitization. Norepinephrine neuronal firing in the locus coeruleus was significantly decreased after 2 and 14 days. A significant increase in dorsal raphe nucleus 5-HT neuronal firing was seen after a two-day regimen, and remained elevated after 14 days. Desensitization of the 5-HT(1A) receptor on 5-HT neurons of the dorsal raphe nucleus occurred after two days of nomifensine administration. Nomifensine likely treated depression by acting on dopamine, norepinephrine and 5-HT neurons, highlighting the importance of the functional connectivity between these three monoaminergic systems.

Neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of fluoxetine in an animal model of anxiety/depression.

Understanding the physiopathology of affective disorders and their treatment relies on the availability of experimental models that accurately mimic aspects of the disease. Here we describe a mouse model of an anxiety/depressive-like state induced by chronic corticosterone treatment. Furthermore, chronic antidepressant treatment reversed the behavioral dysfunctions and the inhibition of hippocampal neurogenesis induced by corticosterone treatment. In corticosterone-treated mice where hippocampal neurogenesis is abolished by X-irradiation, the efficacy of fluoxetine is blocked in some, but not all, behavioral paradigms, suggesting both neurogenesis-dependent and -independent mechanisms of antidepressant action. Finally, we identified a number of candidate genes, the expression of which is decreased by chronic corticosterone and normalized by chronic fluoxetine treatment selectively in the hypothalamus. Importantly, mice deficient in one of these genes, beta-arrestin 2, displayed a reduced response to fluoxetine in multiple tasks, suggesting that beta-arrestin signaling is necessary for the antidepressant effects of fluoxetine.

Interest of using genetically manipulated mice as models of depression to evaluate antidepressant drugs activity: a review.

Among the multiple possibilities to study human depressive disorders, animal models remain important preclinical tools. They allow the understanding of the mechanisms of action of antidepressant drugs. Primarily developed in rat, animal models of depression have been adapted to the mouse, an easy-to-use mammal with better genetic possibilities than rats. As an example, genetic manipulation of the serotoninergic 5-hydroxytryptamine-HT; (5-HT) system provided important opportunities to investigate the role of this monoamine in mood disorders. The contribution of either constitutive knockout (KO), tissue specific, or inducible KO mice and animal models in the current knowledge of the pathophysiology and treatment of depression is unanimously recognized. The phenotype of genetically manipulated animals is strongly influenced by both the genetic background of the animal as well as environmental factors. For these reasons, it is necessary to underline that KO mice have been generated on various genetic backgrounds, which strongly influence the behavioral and neurochemical responses to the tests. The present review will thus focus on KO mice lacking G protein-coupled monoaminergic receptors (e.g; 5-HT1B, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT4 receptors) and the 5-HT serotonin transporter, which is the main target of antidepressant drugs (or strategies). The importance of KO mice for neurotrophic factors, particularly for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its main receptor displaying a tyrosine kinase activity, will also be addressed to illustrate the fact that in preclinical studies, combination of genetic manipulations with pharmacological ones should allow further progress in the field of neuropsychopharmacology.