Comparison of Managing Factor Xa Inhibitor to Unfractionated Heparin Transitions by aPTT Versus a Treatment Guideline Utilizing Heparin Anti-Xa Levels.

BACKGROUND: There are inadequate data on the optimal strategy for transitioning factor Xa inhibitors (FXai; apixaban, rivaroxaban) to unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions. OBJECTIVE: In patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion, this study compared the safety and efficacy of monitoring UFH infusions using an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) titration scale versus utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa titration scale aided by a novel institutional guideline. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion at 2 medical centers from June 1, 2018, to November 1, 2020. One institution utilized aPTT while the other institution primarily used UFH-calibrated anti-Xa. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, major bleeding, or new thrombosis during the hospitalization with a planned noninferiority analysis. Secondary outcomes were also collected including the amount and duration of UFH administered between cohorts. RESULTS: The incidence rate of the primary composite endpoint was 6.3% in the anti-Xa group and 11% in the aPTT group (P < 0.001 for noninferiority, P = 0.138 for superiority) meeting noninferiority criteria. No statistical differences were seen in new thrombosis, major bleeding, or any bleeding. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This represents the first report of a comparison between aPTT versus anti-Xa monitoring in relation to clinical outcomes for patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion. A transition guideline primarily utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa assay appears to be a safe alternative to aPTT monitoring and can aid facilities in the management of patients during these complex transitions.

Current Strategies for the Management of Bleeding Associated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants and a Review of Investigational Reversal Agents.

BACKGROUND: The management of life-threatening bleeding in patients who are receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a serious medical concern. OBJECTIVE: This review provides a concise, balanced overview of the current and future approaches for reversing the anticoagulation effects of DOACs, particularly factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. DISCUSSION: The anticoagulant activity of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran can be reversed by idarucizumab, but until recently, options for the management of major bleeding in patients who were receiving FXa inhibitors were limited to nonspecific strategies, including supplementation of clotting factors with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) or activated PCCs for attenuating anticoagulation effects. They appear as a treatment option in many hospital guidelines despite the lack of approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the lack of rigorous medical evidence supporting their use in this setting. The development of specific reversal agents may provide improved strategies for the management of bleeding. Andexanet alfa is a modified FXa molecule approved in the United States to reverse the anticoagulant effects of FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. Ciraparantag is a small-molecule inhibitor of multiple anticoagulants that has been investigated in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: The current guidelines for management of DOAC-associated bleeding are being updated to reflect that the reversal agent for rivaroxaban and apixaban is now available. For other FXa inhibitors, in the absence of a reversal agent, nonspecific strategies that include PCCs are recommended. The population of patients anticoagulated with DOACs is growing, and we hope that specific reversal agents will improve the approach to management of major bleeding in this population.

Relationship between time spent at extreme International Normalized Ratios and time in therapeutic range with bleeding and thrombosis in warfarin-treated patients.

PURPOSE: The relationship between the time spent at extreme International Normalized Ratios (INRs) and the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) with bleeding and thrombosis in warfarin-treated patients was examined. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated with warfarin for atrial fibrillation or for venous thrombosis who were managed by the anticoagulation management service or adult internal medicine clinic of a large, tertiary care, integrated health system between June 1, 2011, and October 9, 2012, were eligible for study inclusion. Data collected for the outcomes analysis included INRs and dates; current use of aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, ticlopidine, or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; and any clinically significant bleeding or thrombosis events identified. RESULTS: In the 837 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 636.5 patient-years of therapy were provided, of which 14.4 patient-years (2.26% of time) were spent at INRs of <1.5; 2.9 patient-years of therapy (0.45% of time) were spent at INRs of >4.5. The patient population had a mean individual TTR of 65%. The percentage of time at an INR of >4.5 was positively associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (p = 0.0085). The percentage of time spent with an INR of <1.5 was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of thrombosis. CONCLUSION: The percentage of time spent with an INR of >4.5 was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding in patients receiving warfarin for atrial fibrillation or for venous thrombosis at two outpatient clinics. The relationships between thrombosis risk and the TTR or the time spent at an INR of <1.5 were not significant, but the thromboembolic event rate was unusually low, as was the time spent at an INR of <1.5.

High-dose argatroban for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis: a case report and review of laboratory considerations.

PURPOSE: A case report describing high-dose argatroban for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with thrombosis and associated considerations in interpreting laboratory monitoring data are presented. SUMMARY: A 51-year-old woman with an extensive history of coronary artery disease arrived at the emergency department with complaints of chest pain. The patient was admitted, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery was ultimately performed. The patient had a baseline platelet count of 177,000 cells/µL. During hospitalization, the patient received heparin, and her platelet count dropped to 12,000 cells/µL 13 days after the initiation of heparin. The patient developed swelling around a peripherally inserted central catheter and later developed deep vein thrombosis. An argatroban infusion of 2 µg/kg/min was initiated, with a target activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 40-80 seconds. After 5 days of therapy, the patient had increased swelling in her right arm and an aPTT of 56 seconds. Her goal aPTT was subsequently increased. Six days later, the patient developed a left-lower-extremity DVT despite aPTTs within the goal range. A new aPTT target of >75 seconds was set. The infusion rate was increased to 15.5 µg/kg/min to attain the target aPTT. Results of an in vitro test led to an alternative interpretation of aPTT and International Normalized Ratio values that aided in the monitoring of argatroban during the high-dose infusion. CONCLUSION: A patient with HIT with thrombosis was successfully treated with unusually high dosages of argatroban and may have had serum argatroban concentrations exceeding what has commonly been thought to be the therapeutic range.

Rivaroxaban: an oral direct inhibitor of factor Xa.

PURPOSE: The mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy in clinical trials, interactions, adverse effects and toxicity, and place in therapy of rivaroxaban are reviewed. SUMMARY: Rivaroxaban, the first oral, direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor to reach Phase III trials, inhibits thrombin generation by both the intrinsic and the tissue factor pathways. It has shown predictable, reversible inhibition of FXa activity, and it may have the ability to inhibit clot-bound FXa. Rivaroxaban is being evaluated for prevention of venous thrombosis in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, treatment of venous thrombosis, long-term use for secondary prevention of venous thrombosis, and prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation. To date, only short-term trials have been reported, but rivaroxaban's safety and efficacy appear to be at least equivalent to those of traditional anticoagulants. The results of four studies of primary prevention of venous thrombosis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery suggest that rivaroxaban 10 mg daily is a promising alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins. Rivaroxaban appears to have a low potential for drug-drug or drug-food interactions. It offers the advantages of a fixed oral dose, rapid onset of action, and predictable and consistent anticoagulation effect, precluding the need for routine monitoring of anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban is a promising alternative to traditional anticoagulants for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation; it offers once-daily oral administration without the need for routine monitoring.