The role of cystectomy in elderly patients - a multicentre analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Life expectancy in developed countries is continuously increasing. Hence elderly patients are becoming more common in our clinical practice. Currently, one of the greatest challenges of medicine is balancing the life expectancy of elderly patients against aggressive treatments that carry significant risks. OBJECTIVE: To outline the complications and survival in surgical patients 80 years and over undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A review of a radical cystectomy in elderly recorded in four different institutional prospective databases during the period between 1991 and 2014. Clinical and pathologic features, complications and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were available. Median (range) age 82.2 (80-89) years. Seventeen women and 94 men. Regarding the ASA score, 6 patients were ASA I, 47 patients were ASA II, 49 patients ASA III and 9 ASA IV. Prior to surgery, 48 patients had hydronephrosis. The median (range) creatinine series was 1.1 (0.71-11.1) ng/dL. In 88 cases an ileal conduit was performed, 17 a cutaneous ureterostomy diversion, 5 neobladders and 1 ureterosigmoidostomy case. The median (range) operative time was 230 (120-420) min and a total of 97 patients required blood transfusion. The median (range) hospital stay was 14 (7-126) days. The early and late complication rates were 50.4% and 32%, respectively. A total of 14 patients (12.6%) required surgical reintervention. Eight patients (7.2%) died in the immediate postoperative period. The readmission rate of the series was 27.2%. The mean follow-up of the series was 18 (0.27-134.73) months. During this period 66 patients died, 52 of them due to the tumor. Twelve month tumour progression free survival was 83.9% for ≤pT1, 70.2% for pT2 and 36% for ≥pT3, respectively. Twelve month cancer specific survival was 85.6% for ≤pT1, 75.1% for pT2 and 42.5% for ≥pT3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radical cystectomy in elderly population is an aggressive surgical treatment with a significant complication rate, hospital readmission and perioperative mortality rate. Careful selection of patients is essential in order to minimize the complications of this surgery and balance benefits against risks in the elderly population. Tumour progression and cancer specific survival are poor for patients with ≥pT3 disease. Alternatives such as tri-modality therapy need to be considered within a multi-disciplinary approach. More data is required to determine which sub-groups of elderly patients would benefit from a complication, survival and quality of life perspective.

An analysis of deaths related to urological surgery, reviewed by the State Coroner: a case for cardiac vigilance before transurethral prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the frequency of in-hospital deaths after urological surgery in a compulsory reporting setting, and to identify the contributing and potentially reversible factors involved in patients who had had transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: We reviewed all hospital deaths reported to the State Coroner from Coronial Services Victoria (CSV), Australia, in 2000-2002 to identify those instances associated with urological surgery. These cases were then analysed using methods developed by CSV. Resources available included medical records, police reports, government data on operative procedures and autopsy results. RESULTS: There were 20 in-hospital deaths after urological surgery identified for the 3-year period; most related to pre-existing comorbidities, predominantly ischaemic heart disease. Two episodes of hospital-acquired infection, two instances of technical complication of surgery contributing to death, and one pulmonary embolus were identified. Numerically the largest group of deaths after surgery was patients having TURP, and these deaths represented 0.05% (nine of 17 044) of all TURPs in this period. Most in this group (eight) had an acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Death after urological surgery appears to be uncommon; assessing patients for coronary artery disease before urological surgery, particularly TURP, closer cardiovascular monitoring after surgery, and rapid transfer to a coronary care unit if required, may further reduce mortality.