Surgimesh M-SLING(®) transobturator and prepubic four-arm urethral sling for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: clinical prospective assessment at 24 months.

OBJECTIVE: To assess tolerance and mid-term clinical outcomes of treatment, with a new four-arm mesh sling, of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) in men. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a French multicentre prospective study that included 93 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at least 1 year before Surgimesh M-SLING(®) implantation for the treatment of PPI. Data were collected preoperatively, and patients were followed at 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Objective outcome measures included number of pads per day, 24-h pad-test, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) and urinary retention. We also analysed Urinary Symptom Profile (USP(®) ) score, degree of erectile dysfunction, patients' satisfaction level, postoperative pain and procedure complications. Length of catheterization and hospitalization periods were also recorded. Patients were considered cured if no protection was used and/or daily pad weight was <2 g. Patients whose condition was considered to have improved reduced their daily urinary losses by >50%. Those not included in any of the aforementioned groups were assessed as unchanged or to have deteriorated, and were considered as treatment failures. RESULTS: The mean hospitalization period was 1.57 ± 0.70 days. All patients remained catheterized for 1.17 ± 0.48 days. Intention-to-treat analysis at 24 months showed that 34.4% of patients were cured, 27.1% had improved, and 19.4% were considered failures. Two patients experienced transient urinary retention. USP questionnaire scores showed a significant decrease in incontinence and prevalence of hyperactive bladder. There was a nonsignificant tendency for reduced severe erectile dysfunction (ED), and a shift towards moderate ED was observed. No severe complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The Surgimesh M-SLING transobturator and prepubic four-arm urethral sling represents an easy-to-deploy, safe and durable therapeutic alternative for mild to moderate PPI. Its implantation did not have a negative influence on sexual performance outcomes.

Transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate: 3-month functional outcome and complications.

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (multi-centre cohort). Level of Evidence 2b. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early functional outcomes of transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate (TUVis) in a multicentre study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre observational study was conducted in eight urology departments. The inclusion criterion was benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) requiring surgical treatment. Patients on anti-coagulant therapy were not excluded. The TUVis procedure was performed according to a classic transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) scheme following the manufacturer's recommendations. We evaluated subjective functional outcome using self-questionnaires (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] and five-item International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]) and objective criteria (prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], uroflowmetry, post residual volume) at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. All types of complications were systematically recorded. RESULTS: Despite 52% of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy before surgery, we reported only 3% with haemorrhagic complications, no blood transfusion, a mean catheterization time of 44 h and a mean postoperative stay of 2.9 nights. No significant change in irrigation time, catheter time or hospital stay was observed in patients with or without anticoagulant therapy. The IPSS and bother scores significantly decreased after the 3-month follow-up (57% and 59%, respectively), but the average remaining prostate volume was 29 cc and the tissue ablation rate was only 0.5 cc/min. Three major complications occurred, consisting of two urinary fistulas and one partial bladder coagulation. CONCLUSIONS: The TUVis procedure has a proven fast postoperative recovery time, good short-term functional outcome and good haemostatic efficiency. However, the tissue ablation rate was lower than expected and we encountered three major complications, the mechanisms of which remain unclear. Considering the high energy level required to create the plasma effect, the generator, cable and resectoscope must be carefully checked before each procedure.

Surgical management of BPH in patients on oral anticoagulation: transurethral bipolar plasma vaporization in saline versus transurethral monopolar resection of the prostate.

INTRODUCTION: To compare postoperative outcomes of patients on oral anticoagulation (OA) treated with transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate in saline water (TUVis) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January and December 2009, 111 patients on OA therapy were treated with either TURP or TUVis in eight centers. Types of OA and perioperative management were collected. Postoperative outcomes were statistically compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 57 (51%) and 54 (49%) patients were treated with TURP and TUVis, respectively. Types of OA were not significantly different between the two groups, but bladder catheterization prior to surgery was more frequently observed in the TUVis group. Before surgery, 28 patients were treated with warfarin alone, 74 with a platelet aggregation inhibitor (PAI) alone, and 9 with a combination of both. PAI was withdrawn preoperatively in 50 patients. All treatments with warfarin were switched for heparin. Comparison of the two groups showed significantly less hemorrhagic complications after TUVis. Patients treated with TUVis experienced less bladder washouts (2% versus 18%, p = 0.008), less late hematuria (4% versus 19%, p = 0.02), and lower decrease of serum hemoglobin (mean decrease of 0.66 versus 1.47 g/dL, p = 0.02). Postoperative bladder catheterization and hospital stay were significantly shorter, whereas the rate of urinary retention was significantly higher. Three months after surgery, functional results were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on OA, TUVis led to significantly less bleeding, as well as shorter bladder catheterization and hospital stay than TURP.

Blood loss comparison during transurethral resection of prostate and high power GreenLight(™) laser therapy using isotopic measure of red blood cells volume.

BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard in the operative management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The main morbidity of TURP is bleeding, which leads to clot retention and blood transfusion. Newer techniques have appeared, and photovaporization of the prostate (PVP) with the GreenLight™ laser has been developed to reduce the morbidity of bladder outflow surgery. Isotopic measurements of total red cell volume and total blood volume (BV) are a recommended reference technique to evaluate bleeding occurring during endoscopic ablation of the prostate. Here, we compare blood loss during PVP and TURP using an isotopic method. METHODS: Eighteen patients underwent PVP, and 20 patients underwent a TURP for symptomatic BPH by one surgeon. The two groups were comparable in demographic data; however, prostate volume was significantly higher in the PVP group. BV was measured pre- and postoperatively using the isotope technique. RESULTS: The total BV was measured to have increased by 362 mL in PVP group compared with a loss of 315 mL in TURP group (p=0.001). The difference in total red cell volume increased by 148 mL in PVP group compared with a loss of 216 mL in TURP group (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Using the isotope method, we have shown a significant difference in postoperative blood loss between TURP and PVP. Our study is the first to use an isotopic method to measure the blood loss during PVP. This technique needs further standardization before being introduced into routine clinical practice.

Impact of oral anticoagulation on morbidity of transurethral resection of the prostate.

AIM: To assess the impact of oral anticoagulation (OA) on morbidity of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). OA included warfarin and platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAI). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Multicenter analysis of patients operated for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by TURP. Patients under OA were compared to those with no OA. RESULTS: Out of 612 patients included in the analysis, 206 (33%) were on OA prior surgery (55 warfarin, 142 PAI, and 9 warfarin and PAI). No patient continued warfarin and clopidogrel during the operating period. Patients under OA were significantly older (75 vs. 71 yo, P < 0.001), had larger prostate volume (56 vs. 49 ml, P = 0.05), and had higher rate of bladder catheter prior surgery (26 vs. 17%, P = 0.02). At 3 months follow-up, patients in the OA group had a higher weight of resected tissue (24 vs. 21.7 g, P < 0.001), a longer duration of hospitalization (6.4 vs. 4.7 days P < 0.001), a higher rate of bladder clots (13 vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001), red cell transfusion (1.9 vs. 1.0%, P = 0.026), late hematuria (15.0 vs. 8.4%, P = 0.004), and thromboembolic events (2.4 vs. 0.7, P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, OA status was the sole independent parameter associated with bladder clots (P = 0.004) and with late hematuria (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: OA had a significant and independent impact on TURP outcome in terms of bleeding complications. This data could be used for treatment decision and for patient's information prior BPH surgery.

Blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate as measured by the chromium-51 method.

PURPOSE: To evaluate blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and its predictive factors, using the chromium 51 (51Cr) labeling method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to June 2008, 41 patients who underwent TURP for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) at four French urology centers were included in the analysis. Red cells volume was measured by the 51Cr method 1 day before TURP, and on postoperative day 3. Overall blood loss was estimated by multiplication of red cells volume loss and preoperative venous hematocrit value. RESULTS: Mean preoperative red cells volume was 1997 mL. Mean loss of red cells volume was 209 ml, which corresponds to an estimated blood loss of 507 mL. Mean delta of hematocrit and hemoglobin were 1.4% and 0.71 g/dL, respectively. In univariate analysis, prostate volume, weight of resected tissue, preoperative red cells volume, and resection time were significantly and directly associated with loss of red cells volume (P = 0.038, P = 0.004, P = 0.002, and P = 0.039, respectively). Bipolar and monopolar TURP did not lead to significant difference of red cells loss. In multivariate analysis, both preoperative red cells volume and weight of resected tissue were independent predictors of red cells loss (P = 0.017 and P = 0.048 respectively). CONCLUSION: We present the first study to measure blood loss secondary to TURP using the 51Cr method. This technique allowed evaluating blood loss not only during the surgical procedure but also during the postoperative period. We learned from this study that, on average, blood loss from the procedure until postoperative day 3 was more than 500 mL, which is larger than previously reported amounts as measured by other methods. Because significant blood loss might occur during the postoperative period, the 51Cr method should be used to measure blood loss when evaluating new emerging techniques to manage BPH.

[Medical management of uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia: a new decision algorithm]. / Prise en charge médicale de l'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostatenoncompliquée: proposition d'un nouvel algorithme décisionnel.

Management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is currently undergoing profound changes. Medical treatment is not only symptomatic, but may also seek to modify the natural history of the disease, especially by reducing the risk of acute urinary retention. Medical treatment is no longer limited to a single drug: the combination of 2 different drugs from different treatment categories appears superior to single-drug treatment in some patients. Two instrumental techniques - microwave or radiofrequency thermotherapy, previously proposed as alternatives to surgery - are more appropriate as alternatives to medical treatment. These various items make it possible to construct a decision algorithm that is based at each stage on a decision shared with the patient. This algorithm to provide decision aid in management of uncomplicated symptomatic HBP takes initial disease indicators and other patient indicators into account together with its course under treatment, which has not previously been considered by international guidelines.

[Role of prostatic stents and transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the treatment of voiding disorders related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (CTMH-AFU forum 2005)]. / Place des endoprothèses prostatiques et de la thermothérapie micro-ondes transuréthrales dans le traitement des troubles mictionnels liés à l'HBP? (Forum CTMH-aFU 2005).

Prostatic stents and microwave thermotherapy are minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of voiding disorders related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. A review of the literature evaluates the place of these treatments in 2006. Permanent prostatic stenting is rarely used, but remains a treatment option for patients with obstructive disorders and a formal anaesthetic contraindication. Temporary stenting can be used to predict the effect of resection in selected patients. Finally, microwave thermotherapy, not widely used in France, has a promising clinical efficacy and occupies a place between medical treatment and surgery.

Management of non-complicated BPH: proposition of a renewed decision tree.

Nowadays the management of benign prostatic hypertrophia (BPH) is undergoing striking changes. The standard medical treatments are represented by three families which are the phytotherapy, the alpha-blockers and the 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. These treatments were deemed as symptomatic and used only as monotherapy. Recent numerous studies bring new assessments on BPH: the medical treatment is able to modify the natural history of BPH especially by reducing the risk of acute urinary retention. Furthermore the association of two different therapeutic classes seems to be more efficient than the use of a monotherapy in some cases. Similarly the place of two instrumental techniques, the thermotherapy by microwaves or by radiofrequencies, previously proposed as alternatives to the surgical treatment seems to find their way rather as alternatives to the medical treatment. These different elements allow building a renewed decision tree which decisions are shared with the patient at each stage. This decision tree of the management of patients having non-complicated BPH symptoms must include initial clinical characteristics of the patient and its disease and the evolution under treatment which has not been yet considered in the international recommendations. It also considers the possibilities of associations with other therapeutic classes.

Other therapies for BPH patients: desmopressin, anti-cholinergic, anti-inflammatory drugs, and botulinum toxin.

The usual treatments of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) including the alpha-blockers, the inhibitors of the 5-alpha reductase and the phytotherapy drugs allow significant improvements of the lower urinary tracts symptoms (LUTS). However, some patients are not responders or have side effects due to the treatments. Other therapeutic approaches described in the literature are possible in order to alleviate the LUTS. The anti-cholinergic drugs seem to be efficient against the irritating symptoms even if they are supposed to be contra-indicated when there is BPH. Anti-diuretic hormone could be useful to treat nocturia due to diuresis reversal. Inflammation is a part of the underlying mechanisms of BPH and as such the role of the anti-inflammatory drugs has to be revised. Eventually, botulinum toxin is more and more used for patients with neurological bladder and could also have a role in LUTS. If the coming clinical studies on those different treatments confirm the preliminary results, the learning societies in charge of the guidelines would have to update the decision trees by adding these new therapeutic approaches.