Systemic manual therapy to treat long term residuals following COVID-19-related ICU stay: A case report.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this case is to describe an outpatient treatment course using previously published systemic manual therapy protocol to treat a 65-year-old patient who, after prolonged COVID-related intubation, presented with polyneuropathy, organ failure and other residuals. DESIGN: A single-subject case study. METHODS: Review of clinical records and follow-up interview. RESULTS: The patient identified problem scale (PIP) had improved from a high score of 52 to 11; QUICKDASH score improved from 68 to 16. All individual problems had either resolved or remained at a minimal level and the patient had generally returned to his prior level of function including return to work. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It appears that Despite factors such as age, length of ICU stay, length of symptoms before initiation of physical therapy, and complicated hospital stay including multiple organ failure, after receiving physical therapy consists of the systemic manual therapy protocols, the patient rapidly improved during the outpatient episode.

Physical therapy for the treatment of respiratory issues using Systemic Manual Therapy protocols.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic increased the need for an effective treatment for respiratory conditions exponentially. To meet this challenge, we reevaluated the effectiveness of our physical therapy protocols for respiratory conditions. Protocols of interest were categorized as decongestive, neurogenic, mechanical, and immune modulating. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate which of our existing treatment protocols or protocol combinations produce the best outcome. To do so, we analyzed which ones can meet the following criteria when compared to all other treatments: test statistic (>2.0) in parametric and non-parametric tests, [statistical significance (p < 0.05)], effect size larger than 0.2, difference in the Patient Identified Problem Scale (PIP) score above Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), and sample size minimum 15 treatments. DESIGN: Retrospective multivariate analysis using a modified adaptive platform design. METHODS: A computerized sampling using respiratory related key words from a blinded dataset yielded 178 patients with respiratory complaints or pain in the chest area. Additional statistical analysis using parametric and non-parametric tests evaluated the difference between each treatment protocol and the rest of the treatments provided. RESULTS: Several protocol combinations and one individual protocol passed the study criteria. Cardiac vascular venous thoracic (CVVT) protocol was used most frequently within these combinations (7), followed by Urinary Drainage (UD) (4). Other protocols in this group were Cardiac Cervical Cranial Vascular (CCCV), Venous Thoracic Cardiopulmonary (VTCP), and Diaphragm Cranial Sinus (DCS). Among the respiratory specific protocols, CVVT was significantly better than VTCP (0.40, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: For the patient population studied, CVVT appears to be the primary protocol to consider, followed by UD, CCCV, VTCP, and DCS. Combining CVVT with Barral Abdominal Motility protocol (Barral) or VTCP with Lower Abdominal Urogenital (LAUG) on the same day might be required with acute patients.