Long-Term Cost Analysis of Third-Line Treatment Options for Overactive Bladder.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to analyze the long-term cost of overactive bladder third-line treatments. METHODS: This insurance claims review analyzed the 2015 to 2020 MarketScan (MKS) claims data set subjects age ≥ 18, diagnosis of overactive bladder (OAB) using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes and receipt of treatment for percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation (SNM), or botulinum A. Age, gender, treatment types, and cost were extracted. Treatment costs were aggregated at the level of patient and treatment type for total payment and patient contribution by combining copay, coinsurance, and deductible. We used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous and chi-square test for categorical variables. SAS v9.4 was used for analyses. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: We identified 17,755 patients from the commercial claims MKS and 10,912 patients from the Medicare supplemental (MDC) database with mean age 50.7±11.1 and 75.5±7.6 years, respectively, who underwent ≥ 1 third-line OAB treatment. Patients receiving third-line treatment were predominantly female (84.9%, MKS, 74.8%, MDC). Long-term costs over a 15-year period were estimated. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is the most expensive in terms of total net payment ($105,337.50 MKS, $94,102.50 MDC) and patient contribution ($9177.60 MKS, $3921.00 MDC). Total net payment for botulinum A was $67,968 (MSK), $54,261 (MDC), and patient contribution cost was $2850 (MSK), $1110 (MDC). The most cost-effective option was SNM in terms of both total net payment ($5179.10 MKS, $6099.00 MDC) and patient contribution ($59.10 MKS, $60.00 MDC). CONCLUSIONS: SNM was the most cost-effective third-line treatment for OAB looking over a 15-year period in terms of both total net payment and patient contribution.

Contemporary Patterns of Third-line Treatments for Privately Insured Individuals With Overactive Bladder in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate utilization of third-line overactive bladder (OAB) treatments including percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), and intradetrusor botulinum toxin A (BTX) among privately insured patients and examine factors associated with their use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using MarketScan claims (2015-2017), we identified patients who underwent third-line OAB treatments based on procedure codes. Factors of interest included location, age, health plan, among others. We fit multivariable logistic regression models to estimate associations between pertinent factors with receipt of PTNS and SNS relative to BTX and associations between provider type and practice location with each treatment modality. RESULTS: We identified 7383 patients (mean age 50.9) in our cohort. SNS was used most frequently (n = 3602, 48.8%), while PTNS was used least frequently (n = 955, 12.9%). PTNS patients were more likely to reside in metropolitan areas (vs BTX: OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.3-2.1; vs SNS: OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.7-2.8), be aged 55 years or older (vs BTX: 54% vs 47%, OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.1; vs SNS: 54% vs 45%, OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.0), and be covered under a health maintenance organization (vs BTX: 17% vs 10%; vs SNS: 17% vs 10%, P <.01). Urologists were most likely to perform SNS, and gynecologists were most likely to perform BTX. 91% of PTNS procedures were performed in office settings. CONCLUSION: Among patients receiving third-line OAB treatment, PTNS was used infrequently. PTNS utilization was concentrated within urban areas, and among older patients and those covered by cost-conscious health maintenance organizations.

Efficacy of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder in Women and Men at a Safety Net Hospital.

PURPOSE: We investigated efficacy and compliance related to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients treated for overactive bladder at a large, urban safety net hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation at Grady Memorial Hospital from May 2015 through January 2019 were included in our cohort and records were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcomes of interest included self-reported urinary symptoms and episodes of urinary incontinence. Our secondary outcome of interest was patient compliance, defined as completion of 12 or more treatment sessions. Descriptive analysis and paired t-tests were performed. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients with a mean ± SD age of 59 ± 12 years 80% were black, 52% were male, 34% were uninsured and 54% subscribed to government insurance. Prior treatment included behavioral modification in 100% of cases, anticholinergics in 86% and mirabegron in 4%. Patients completed a mean of 10.7 ± 2.7 of the 12 planned weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatments. Of the patients 70% completed all 12 weekly treatments and 77% of those who completed 12 treatments continued to maintenance treatment. After percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatment average symptoms improved across all metrics, including mean daytime frequency (from 11.0 to 6.6 episodes per day or -24.5%), nighttime frequency (from 4.8 to 2.5 episodes per night or -47.1%), urgency score (from 3.4 to 1.9 or -42.1%) and incontinence (from 1.6 to 0.4 episodes per day or -79.6%) (each p <0.001). A total of 43 patients (86%) reported symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation had favorable efficacy and compliance in a traditionally underserved patient population. This should be considered as a feasible modality to manage overactive bladder symptoms in patients in a similar demographic.