Safety and efficacy of Vitamin D3 supplementation with Imatinib in Chronic Phase- Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: an Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare early molecular response (EMR) rates at 3 months of imatinib therapy with and without vitamin D3 supplementation in patients newly diagnosed with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML-CP). The secondary objective was to assess the effects of vitamin D3 on complete haematological response (CHR) and its safety. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory randomised trial. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital in northern India. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naive patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (n=62) aged >12 years were recruited from January 2020 to January 2021. Patients with progressive disease, pregnancy and hypercalcaemia were excluded. INTERVENTION: Oral vitamin D3 supplementation (60 000 IU) or matched placebo was given once weekly for an initial 8 weeks along with imatinib after randomisation with 1:1 allocation ratio. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was to compare EMR (defined as BCR-ABL1 transcript level ≤10%, international scale) at 3 months. The secondary outcomes were to compare effect of the intervention on CHR, correlation of 25(OH)2D3 levels with treatment response and safety according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. RESULTS: At baseline, 14.5% of the patients had normal vitamin D3 levels. EMR at 3 months was attained in 24 patients (82.7%) of the vitamin D3 group and 21 (75%) of the placebo group (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.37 to 7.37, p=0.4). A significant difference in vitamin D3 levels from baseline to the end of study was observed. Patients with vitamin D3 supplementation did not achieve higher CHR in comparison with placebo (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.25 to 7.23, p=1.0). Vitamin D3 levels were not significantly correlated with BCR-ABL1 levels. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D3 levels were low among patients with CML-CP in this study. Vitamin D3 supplementation with imatinib therapy did not have significant effect on EMR or CHR. Further clinical trials could be undertaken to assess the effective dosage and duration of vitamin D3 supplementation in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2019/09/021164.

Host Cell and SARS-CoV-2-Associated Molecular Structures and Factors as Potential Therapeutic Targets.

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is caused by an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus, referred to as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which belongs to the realm Riboviria, order Nidovirales, family Coronaviridae, genus Betacoronavirus and the species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus. This viral disease is characterized by a myriad of varying symptoms, such as pyrexia, cough, hemoptysis, dyspnoea, diarrhea, muscle soreness, dysosmia, lymphopenia and dysgeusia amongst others. The virus mainly infects humans, various other mammals, avian species and some other companion livestock. SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry is primarily accomplished by molecular interaction between the virus's spike (S) protein and the host cell surface receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), although other host cell-associated receptors/factors, such as neuropilin 1 (NRP-1) and neuropilin 2 (NRP-2), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), as well as proteases such as TMPRSS2 (transmembrane serine protease 2) and furin, might also play a crucial role in infection, tropism, pathogenesis and clinical outcome. Furthermore, several structural and non-structural proteins of the virus themselves are very critical in determining the clinical outcome following infection. Considering such critical role(s) of the abovementioned host cell receptors, associated proteases/factors and virus structural/non-structural proteins (NSPs), it may be quite prudent to therapeutically target them through a multipronged clinical regimen to combat the disease.

Evaluation of prescription practices in rheumatoid arthritis at the rheumatology clinic in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to analyze the prescription pattern of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand, India. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 150 RA patients who were given DMARD therapy. Patient's demographic details, drugs prescribed with their dosage and administration routes and the usage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy were recorded to study the prescription pattern. RESULTS: Overall, 4 DMARDs were prescribed in all the studied patients: Methotrexate (n = 150), hydroxychloroquine (n = 35), leflunomide (n = 5), and adalimumab (n = 1). Single DMARD therapy with methotrexate was prescribed to 110 (73.3%) followed by double therapy with methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine in 35 (23.3%), triple therapy (methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine + leflunomide) in 4 (2.7%) and triple therapy with biological DMARD (methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine + leflunomide + adalimumab) in 1 (0.7%) patient. Adjuvant therapy drugs included: Prednisolone (n = 150), folic acid (n = 150), naproxen (n = 150), calcium (n = 150), vitamin D (n = 150) and indomethacin (n = 40). Of the total, 61.4% patients also took complimentary alternative medicine (CAM) therapy. CONCLUSION: Our study concludes that the most commonly prescribed DMARDs in our setting, to patients of RA, in descending order of frequency were methotrexate, followed by hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide and lastly adalimumab. A total of five adjuvant medications were commonly prescribed to all patients. There was a high prevalence of self-medicated CAM therapy in the majority of these patients.