Precision Patient Navigation to Improve Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy, An Individual Randomized Effectiveness Trial.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening by annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) with follow-up on abnormal results is a cost-effective strategy to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Unfortunately, many patients with abnormal results do not complete a follow-up colonoscopy. We tested whether navigation targeted to patients who are unlikely to complete the procedure may improve adherence and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Study participants were patients at a large, integrated health system (Kaiser Permanente Northwest) who were ages 50 to 75 and were due for a follow-up colonoscopy after a recent abnormal FIT result. Probability of adherence to follow-up was estimated at baseline using a predictive risk model. Patients whose probability was 70% or lower were randomized to receive patient navigation or usual care, with randomization stratified by probability category (<50%, 50% < 60%, 60% < 65%, 65% ≤ 70%). We compared colonoscopy completion within 6 months between the navigation and usual care groups using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Participants (n = 415; 200 assigned to patient navigation, 215 to usual care) had a mean age of 62 years, 54% were female, and 87% were non-Hispanic white. By 6 months, 76% of the patient navigation group had completed a colonoscopy, compared with 65% of the usual care group (HR = 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.72; log-rank P value = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, patient navigation led to improvements in follow-up colonoscopy adherence. IMPACT: More research is needed to assess the value of precision-directed navigation programs.

Managers' Support for Employee Wellness Programs: An Integrative Review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this integrative literature review is to synthesize the existing evidence regarding managers' support for employee wellness programs. DATA SOURCE: The search utilized multiple electronic databases and libraries. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria comprised peer-reviewed research published in English, between 1990 and 2016, and examining managers' support in the context of a worksite intervention. The final sample included 21 articles for analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Two researchers extracted and described results from each of the included articles using a content analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently rated the quality of the included articles. Researchers synthesized data into a summary table by study design, sample, data collected, key findings, and quality rating. RESULTS: Factors that may influence managers' support include their organization's management structure, senior leadership support, their expected roles, training on health topics, and their beliefs and attitudes toward wellness programs and employee health. Managers' support may influence the organizational culture, employees' perception of support, and employees' behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: When designing interventions, health promotion practitioners and researchers should consider strategies that target senior, middle, and line managers' support. Interventions need to include explicit measures of managers' support as part of the evaluation plan.

Cancer control planners' perceptions and use of evidence-based programs.

The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network surveyed 282 cancer control planners to inform its efforts to increase the use of evidence-based cancer control programs (EBPs; programs that have been scientifically tested and have successfully changed behavior). Respondents included planners from organizations in state Comprehensive Cancer Control coalitions as well as other governmental and nongovernmental organizations and community-based coalitions. Respondents provided information about personal and organizational characteristics, their cancer control programs, their attitudes toward EBPs, and their awareness and use of Web-based resources for EBPs. Although findings showed strong preferences for cancer control programs that have been shown to work, less than half of respondents (48%) had ever used EBP resources. Regardless of whether they had used EBP resources, almost all respondents (97%) indicated that further training would help them and their organizations adopt and adapt EBPs for use in their communities. The most frequently endorsed training needs were finding and securing additional resources (such as funding and technical assistance), followed by adapting EBPs for cultural appropriateness. The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network consortium is using these findings to develop a Web-based interactive training and decision support tool that is responsive to the needs identified by the survey respondents.

Colorectal cancer screening practices of primary care physicians in Washington State.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening reduces death from colorectal cancer, but screening rates are low. While research has identified barriers to screening from the patient perspective, less research has addressed screening from the physician perspective. METHODS: The Washington Comprehensive Cancer Control Partnership conducted a survey of primary care physicians in Washington State to measure their knowledge, attitudes, and practices for colorectal cancer screening of average-risk patients. The survey was mailed to a simple random sample of 700 primary care physicians in Washington State. Sixty-nine percent of the eligible physicians in the sample participated. RESULTS: Most respondents (76%) recommended one or more colorectal cancer screening tests in agreement with American Cancer Society guidelines, and 93% perceived patient anxiety about colorectal cancer screening tests to be a significant barrier to screening. Ninety percent of physicians reported using the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as a screening test, but most did not report performing any tracking or using any mechanism to encourage their patients to complete and return FOBT kits. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest three intervention approaches to increase colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings: improve physicians' knowledge about current screening guidelines (especially appropriate age and screening intervals), encourage physicians to strongly recommend screening to patients, and help physicians adopt tracking systems to follow screening to completion.