Current preconception care practice in the Netherlands - An evaluation study among birth care professionals.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current practice of preconception care in the Netherlands and the perceptions of birth care professionals concerning preconception care. METHODS: We have developed a digital questionnaire and conducted a cross-sectional study by distributing the questionnaire among 102 organisations: 90 primary care midwifery practices and obstetric departments of 12 hospitals in the Southwest region of the Netherlands between December 2020 and March 2021. One birth care professional per organization was asked to complete the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results. FINDINGS: Respondents of eighty-three organisations (81.4 %) filled in the questionnaire, of whom 74 respondents were independent primary care midwives and 9 respondents were obstetricians. Preconception care mostly consisted of an individual consultation in which personalized health and lifestyle advice was given. Among the respondents, 44.4 % reported that the organization had a preconception care protocol. The way in which the consultation was carried out, as well as the health and lifestyle related questions asked, differed between respondents. More than 85 % of the respondents inquire about the following possible risk factors for complications: maternal illnesses, obstetric history, folic acid supplement intake, alcohol intake, smoking, substance abuse, hereditary disease, prescription medication, dietary habits, overweight, and birth defects in the family. The respondents acknowledged that preconception care should be offered to all couples who wish to become pregnant, as opposed to offering preconception care only to those with an increased risk of complications. Still, respondents do not receive many questions regarding the preconception period or requests for preconception care consultations. KEY CONCLUSION: Birth care professionals acknowledge the need for preconception care for all couples. In the Netherlands, preconception care consists mostly of an individual consultation with recommendations for health and lifestyle advice. However, the identification of risk factors varies between birth care professionals and less than half of the respondents indicate that they have a protocol available in their practice. Furthermore, the demand of parents-to-be for preconception care is low. More research, that includes more obstetricians, is necessary to investigate if there is a difference between the care provided by primary care midwives and obstetricians. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To increase the awareness and uptake of preconception care, it would be prudent to emphasize its importance to parents-to-be and professionals, and actively promote the use of widespread, standardized protocols for birth care professionals.

Type of deliveries supported by Dutch clinical midwives.

OBJECTIVE: The number of clinical midwives in the Netherlands has substantially increased over the last twenty years, but their role in obstetric care is not clearly defined. Our aim was to identify the type of deliveries that are usually supported by clinical midwives and whether these changed over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: National data from the Netherlands Perinatal Registry from the years 2000 to 2016 (n = 2.999.411 deliveries) were used to divide all deliveries into classes using latent class analyses based on delivery characteristics. In the primary analyses, the identified classes, type of hospital, and year of cohort were used to predict deliveries supported by a clinical midwife. In secondary analyses, the same analyses were repeated where the classes were replaced by individual level characteristics of deliveries and stratified by referral during birth. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: The latent class analyses identified three classes: I. referral during birth; II. Induction of labour; and III. Planned caesarian section. The primary analyses indicated that women in both class I and II were frequently supported by clinical midwives and those in the third class almost never. Therefore, only data from deliveries assigned to class I and II were used in the secondary analyses. The secondary analyses showed that clinical midwives supported deliveries with a great variety in characteristics, such as pain relief and preterm birth. Although the frequency of clinical midwives being involved in the second stage of labour increased over the years, we did not find noticeable changes in their involvement. KEY CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinical midwives care for women with various types of deliveries with varying degrees of pathology and complexity during second stage of labour. Additional training, taking previously acquired skills and competences into account, is necessary to deal with this complexity for which clinical midwives are not always trained.

Development of a Blueprint for Integrated Care for Vulnerable Pregnant Women.

PURPOSE: There has been increasing awareness of perinatal health and organisation of maternal and child health care in the Netherlands as a result of poor perinatal outcomes. Vulnerable women have a higher risk of these poor perinatal outcomes and also have a higher chance of receiving less adequate care. Therefore, within a consortium, embracing 100 organisations among professionals, educators, researchers, and policymakers, a joint aim was defined to support maternal and child health care professionals and social care professionals in providing adequate, integrated care for vulnerable pregnant women. DESCRIPTION: Within the consortium, vulnerability is defined as the presence of psychopathology, psychosocial problems, and/or substance use, combined with a lack of individual and/or social resources. Three studies focussing on population characteristics, organisation of care and knowledge, skills, and attitudes of professionals regarding vulnerable pregnant women, were carried out. Outcomes were discussed in three field consultations. ASSESSMENT: The outcomes of the studies, followed by the field consultations, resulted in a blueprint that was subsequently adapted to local operational care pathways in seven obstetric collaborations (organisational structures that consist of obstetricians of a single hospital and collaborating midwifery practices) and their collaborative partners. We conducted 12 interviews to evaluate the adaptation of the blueprint to local operational care pathways and its' embedding into the obstetric collaborations. CONCLUSION: Practice-based research resulted in a blueprint tailored to the needs of maternal and child health care professionals and social care professionals and providing structure and uniformity to integrated care provision for vulnerable pregnant women.