Using the national registry of HIV-infected veterans in research: lessons for the development of disease registries.

Disease-specific registries have many important applications in epidemiologic, clinical and health services research. Since 1989 the Department of Veterans Affairs has maintained a national HIV registry. VA's HIV registry is national in scope, it contains longitudinal data and detailed resource utilization and clinical information. To describe the structure, function, and limitations of VA's national HIV registry, and to test its accuracy and completeness. The VA's national HIV registry contains data that are electronically extracted from VA's computerized comprehensive clinical and administrative databases, called Veterans Integrated Health Systems Technology and Architecture (VISTA). We examined the number of AIDS patients and the number of new patients identified to the registry, by year, through December 1996. We verified data elements against information obtained from the medical records at five VA sites. By December 1996, 40,000 HIV-infected patients had been identified to the registry. We encountered missing data and problems with data classification. Missing data occurred for some elements related to the computer programming that creates the registry (e.g., pharmacy files), and for other elements because manual entry is required (e.g., ethnicity). Lack of a standardized data classification system was a problem, especially for the pharmacy and laboratory files. In using VA's national HIV registry we have learned important lessons, which, if taken into account in the future, could lead to the creation of model disease-specific registries.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for stable angina pectoris: outcomes for patients with double-vessel versus single-vessel coronary artery disease in a Veterans Affairs Cooperative randomized trial. Veterans Affairs ACME InvestigatorS.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess outcomes of men with double-vessel coronary artery disease randomly assigned to treatment by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or medical therapy, compared with previously reported outcomes for men with single-vessel disease. BACKGROUND: We previously reported that PTCA provides better symptom relief and treadmill performance than medical therapy for men with stable angina pectoris due to single-vessel disease. Whether this advantage applies to patients with double-vessel disease is unknown. METHODS: Male patients (n = 328) with stable angina pectoris and ischemia on treadmill testing were randomly assigned to PTCA or medical therapy; 101 patients had double-vessel disease, and 227 had single-vessel disease. Symptoms, treadmill performance, quality of life score, coronary stenosis and myocardial perfusion were compared at baseline and at 6 months. Patients were followed up for up to 6 years and underwent additional treadmill testing 2 to 3 years after randomization. RESULTS: PTCA-treated and medically treated patients with double-vessel disease experienced comparable improvement in exercise duration (+1.2 vs. +1.3 min, respectively, p = 0.89), freedom from angina (53% and 36%, respectively, p = 0.09) and improvement of overall quality of life score (+1.3 vs. +4.4, respectively, p = 0.32) at 6 months compared with baseline. This contrasts with greater advantages favoring PTCA by these criteria in patients with single-vessel disease (p = 0.0001 to 0.02). Trends present at 6 months persisted at late follow-up. Patients undergoing double-vessel dilation had less complete initial revascularization (45% vs. 83%) and greater average stenosis of worst lesions at 6 months (74% vs. 56%). Likewise, patients with double-vessel disease showed less improved myocardial perfusion imaging (59% vs. 75%). CONCLUSIONS: PTCA is beneficial in male patients with double-vessel disease; however, we cannot demonstrate the same advantage over medical therapy seen in similar patients with single-vessel disease. Less complete revascularization and greater restenosis for patients having multiple dilations would account for these findings. Alternatively, a type 2 error might be operative. Technical advances since completion of this trial might improve these outcomes. These findings warrant further investigation in a larger trial.