Use of low-level laser therapy for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the most common conditions all over the world. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in patients with CRS. Fourteen adult patients with CRS participated in this single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial (12 male, mean age 40 years). Patients received five successive sessions of sham laser followed by five successive sessions of real laser after 2 days. Ga-Al-As laser of 830 nm in a continuous mode at a power output of 30 mW and energy dose of 1 J was applied on the cheeks and the forehead for the maxillary and frontal sinuses, respectively. Laser was delivered on six points over each sinus, each point for 33 s. Four measurements were taken. The total symptom score (TSS) was calculated as the primary outcome measure. The effects of LLLT on TSS were evaluated by using repeated measure ANOVA. The percentage improvement of real laser and sham laser was compared by Wilcoxon signed ranked test. Cohen's d was used to calculate the effect size. Total symptom score significantly improved after real laser (p = 0.015, Cohen's d = 0.69). The percentage improvement for real laser (34.12 ± 46.43) was significantly better than the sham laser (5.02 ± 37.34, Z = - 2.23, p = 0.026). No significant improvements were observed after sham laser. This study indicates that five-session active LLLT when compared with sham is effective in the treatment of CRS symptoms.

Evaluating Differences Between Participants With Various Forward Head Posture With and Without Postural Neck Pain Using Craniovertebral Angle and Forward Shoulder Angle.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between individuals with various forward head posture (FHP) severities with and without postural neck pain using craniovertebral angle and forward shoulder angle. METHOD: Ninety participants age 20 to 50 years were categorized into the following 4 groups based on observational method and presence or absence of postural neck pain: (1) slight FHP group without pain, (2) slight FHP group with pain, (3) moderate-to-severe FHP group without pain, and (4) moderate-to-severe FHP group with pain. A digital imaging technique was used to measure the craniovertebral angle and forward shoulder angle in a standing position. RESULTS: A 1-way analysis of variance test showed a significant difference for craniovertebral angle in the 4 groups (F = 22.04, P < .001). Tukey's test showed the difference in this variable was significant between slight FHP groups (with or without pain) and moderate-to-severe FHP groups (with or without pain) (P < .001). Although overall F indicated a significant difference (F = 4.11, P < .009) of the forward shoulder angle in 4 groups, Tukey's test revealed this was only significantly different in 2 groups: slight FHP with pain and moderate-to-severe FHP with pain (P = .005). CONCLUSION: The craniovertebral angle in the 2 groups of moderate-to-severe FHP was significantly smaller than that in the 2 groups of slight FHP. However, the forward shoulder angle in the group of moderate-to-severe FHP with pain was only significantly smaller than that in slight FHP with pain. The results showed that including pain as a factor of categorization did not lead to a significant difference between various groups regarding craniovertebral angle and forward shoulder angle.