Efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in Identifying Pathogenic Germline Variants Among Unselected Patients with Prostate Cancer: The PROCLAIM Trial.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in cancer predisposition genes may be eligible for U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies, clinical trials, or enhanced screening. Studies suggest that eligible patients are missing genetics-informed care due to restrictive testing criteria. OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of actionable PGVs among prospectively accrued, unselected PCa patients, stratified by their guideline eligibility. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive, unselected PCa patients were enrolled at 15 sites in the USA from October 2019 to August 2021, and had multigene cancer panel testing. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Correlates between the prevalence of PGVs and clinician-reported demographic and clinical characteristics were examined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 958 patients (median [quartiles] age at diagnosis 65 [60, 71] yr), 627 (65%) had low- or intermediate-risk disease (grade group 1, 2, or 3). A total of 77 PGVs in 17 genes were identified in 74 patients (7.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-9.6%). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of PGVs among patients who met the 2019 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Prostate criteria (8.8%, 43/486, 95% CI 6.6-12%) versus those who did not (6.6%, 31/472, 95% CI 4.6-9.2%; odds ratio 1.38, 95% CI 0.85-2.23), indicating that these criteria would miss 42% of patients (31/74, 95% CI 31-53%) with PGVs. The criteria were less effective at predicting PGVs in patients from under-represented populations. Most PGVs (81%, 60/74) were potentially clinically actionable. Limitations include the inability to stratify analyses based on individual ethnicity due to low numbers of non-White patients with PGVs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that almost half of PCa patients with PGVs are missed by current testing guidelines. Comprehensive germline genetic testing should be offered to all patients with PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: One in 13 patients with prostate cancer carries an inherited variant that may be actionable for the patient's current care or prevention of future cancer, and could benefit from expanded testing criteria.

Hereditary Cancer Risk Using a Genetic Chatbot Before Routine Care Visits.

OBJECTIVE: To examine user uptake and experience with a clinical chatbot that automates hereditary cancer risk triage by collecting personal and family cancer history in routine women's health care settings. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective observational study of patients who used a web-based chatbot before routine care appointments to assess their risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and adenomatous polyposis syndromes. Outcome measures included uptake and completion of the risk-assessment and educational section of the chatbot interaction and identification of hereditary cancer risk as evaluated against National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. RESULTS: Of the 95,166 patients invited, 61,070 (64.2%) engaged with the clinical chatbot. The vast majority completed the cancer risk assessment (89.4%), and most completed the genetic testing education section (71.4%), indicating high acceptability among those who opted to engage. The mean duration of use was 15.4 minutes (SD 2 hours, 56.2 minutes) when gaps of inactivity longer than 5 minutes were excluded. A personal history of cancer was reported by 19.1% (10,849/56,656) and a family history of cancer was reported by 66.7% (36,469/54,652) of patients who provided the relevant information. One in four patients (14,850/54,547) screened with the chatbot before routine care appointments met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing. Among those who were tested, 5.6% (73/1,313) had a disease-causing pathogenic variant. CONCLUSION: A chatbot digital health tool can help identify patients at high risk for hereditary cancer syndromes before routine care appointments. This scalable intervention can effectively provide cancer risk assessment, engage patients with educational information, and facilitate a path toward preventive genetic testing. FUNDING SOURCE: Implementation of the chatbot in clinics was funded by industry support from commercial genetic testing laboratories Ambry, Invitae, and Progenity.

Ancestry-specific polygenic scores and SNP heritability of 25(OH)D in African- and European-ancestry populations.

Vitamin D inadequacy, assessed by 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], affects around 50% of adults in the United States and is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes. Blood 25(OH)D concentrations are influenced by genetic factors that may determine how much vitamin D intake is required to reach optimal 25(OH)D. Despite large genome-wide association studies (GWASs), only a small portion of the genetic factors contributing to differences in 25(OH)D has been discovered. Therefore, knowledge of a fuller set of genetic factors could be useful for risk prediction of 25(OH)D inadequacy, personalized vitamin D supplementation, and prevention of downstream morbidity and mortality. Using PRSice and weights from published African- and European-ancestry GWAS summary statistics, ancestry-specific polygenic scores (PGSs) were created to capture a more complete set of genetic factors in those of European (n = 9569) or African ancestry (n = 2761) from three cohort studies. The PGS for African ancestry was derived using all input SNPs (a p value cutoff of 1.0) and had an R2 of 0.3%; for European ancestry, the optimal PGS used a p value cutoff of 3.5 × 10-4 in the target/tuning dataset and had an R2 of 1.0% in the validation cohort. Those with highest genetic risk had 25(OH)D that was 2.8-3.0 ng/mL lower than those with lowest genetic risk (p = 0.0463-3.2 × 10-13), requiring an additional 467-500 IU of vitamin D intake to maintain equivalent 25(OH)D. PGSs are a powerful predictive tool that could be leveraged for personalized vitamin D supplementation to prevent the negative downstream effects of 25(OH)D inadequacy.