Suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) characteristics in people with Parkinson's disease compared to healthy controls.

The suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) is a newly described indicator of vestibular function which yields two measures: vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and a saccadic response. It is an alternative and complementary test to the head impulse test paradigm (HIMP). Parkinson's disease (PD) has known saccadic and central vestibular pathway dysfunction. This paper is the first description of SHIMP VOR gain and saccade characteristic in this population. This prospective observational study measured the SHIMP VOR gain and saccade characteristics in 39 participants with idiopathic PD and compared this to 40 healthy controls (HC). The effect of group, demographic variables and SHIMP characteristics were evaluated. SHIMP VOR gains were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.10). Compared to HC, the PD group mean SHIMP peak saccade velocity was significantly reduced by an average of 77.07°/sec (p < 0.001), and SHIMP saccade response latency was longer, with an average delay of 23.5 ms (p = 0.003). SHIMP saccade peak velocity was also associated with both head impulse velocity (p = 0.002) and SHIMP VOR gain (p = 0.004) variables, but there was no significant influence of these variables when SHIMP saccade peak velocity was considered as a predictor of PD (p = 0.52-0.91). VOR gains were unaffected by PD. PD-specific saccadic dysfunction, namely reduced peak saccade velocities and prolonged response latencies, were observed in the SHIMP-induced saccade responses. VOR gain using slow phase eye velocity is preferred as the indicator of vestibular function in the SHIMPs paradigm as non-vestibular factors affected saccade peak velocity.

Static and dynamic otolith reflex function in people with Parkinson's disease.

PURPOSE: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with possible vestibular system dysfunction. This study reports the transient and sustained functions of the otoliths and their reflex pathways in PD compared to healthy controls (HC) and determines if otolith function relates to previous fall history. METHODS: Forty participants with PD and 40 HC had their otolith function assessed. Transient saccular and utricular-mediated reflexes were assessed by cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs, respectively) elicited by air-conducted stimulus (clicks) and bone-conducted vibration (light tendon hammer taps). Static otolith function was assessed by the Curator Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) test. RESULTS: Compared to HC, the PD group had significantly more absent cVEMP responses to both clicks (47.5% vs. 30%, respectively, p = 0.03) and taps (21.8% vs. 5%, respectively, p = 0.002). Only the PD group had bilaterally absent tap cVEMPs, this was related to previous falls history (p < 0. 001). In both groups, click oVEMPs were predominantly absent, and tap oVEMPs were predominantly present. The PD group had smaller tap oVEMP amplitudes (p = 0.03) and recorded more abnormal SVV responses (p = 0.01) and greater error on SVV compared to HC, p < 0.001. SVV had no relationship with VEMP responses (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: PD impacts on cVEMP reflex pathways but not tap oVEMP reflex pathways. Bone-conducted otolith stimuli (taps) are more robust than air-conducted sound stimuli (clicks) for both o and cVEMPs. A lack of association between SVV and VEMP responses suggest that static and dynamic otolith functions are differentially affected in PD.