Comparison of Inline R2* MRI versus FerriScan for liver iron quantification in patients on chelation therapy for iron overload: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVES: MRI quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) using R2 or R2* relaxometry requires offline post-processing causing reporting delays, administrative overhead, and added costs. A prototype 3D multi-gradient-echo pulse sequence, with inline post-processing, allows immediate calculation of LIC from an R2* map (inline R2*-LIC) without offline processing. We compared inline R2*-LIC to FerriScan and offline R2* calibration methods. METHODS: Forty patients (25 women, 15 men; age 18-82 years), prospectively underwent FerriScan and the prototype sequence, which produces two R2* maps, with and without fat modeling, as well as an inline R2*-LIC map derived from the R2* map with fat modeling, with informed consent. For each map, the following contours were drawn: ROIs, whole-axial-liver contour, and an exact copy of contour utilized by FerriScan. LIC values from the FerriScan report and those calculated using an alternative R2 calibration were the reference standards. Results were compared using Pearson and interclass correlation coefficients (PCC, ICC), linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and estimation of area under the receiver operator curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS: Inline R2*-LIC demonstrated good agreement with the reference standards. Compared to FerriScan, inline R2*-LIC with whole-axial-liver contour, ROIs, and FerriScan contour demonstrated PCC of 94.8%, 94.8%, and 92%; ICC 93%, 92.7%, and 90.2%; regression slopes 1.004, 0.974, and 1.031; mean bias 5.54%, 10.91%, and 0.36%; and ROC-AUC estimates 0.903, 0.906, and 0.890 respectively. Agreement was maintained when adjusted for sex, age, diagnosis, liver fat content, and fat-water swap. CONCLUSION: Inline R2*-LIC provides robust and comparable quantification of LIC compared to FerriScan, without the need for offline post-processing. KEY POINTS: • In patients being treated for iron overload with chelation therapy, liver iron concentration (LIC) is regularly assessed in order to monitor and adjust therapy. • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to quantify LIC. Several R2 and R2* methods are available, all of which require offline post-processing. • A novel R2* MRI method allows for immediate calculation of LIC and provides comparable quantification of LIC to the FerriScan and recently published alternative R2* methods.

Pretreatment anxiety and pain acceptance are associated with response to trigger point injection therapy for chronic myofascial pain.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study examined the psychosocial profile of patients who responded or did not respond to trigger point injection therapy for chronic myofascial pain. METHODS: Seventy one patients with a diagnosis of chronic myofascial pain of the paraspinous muscles completed a pretreatment questionnaire measuring demographic and social factors, and validated scales to assess pain intensity, pain interference (physical and emotional), and defined psychological characteristics (pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, pain self-efficacy, mood and anxiety). Trigger point injection therapy of the affected areas of myofascial pain was performed and follow-up was conducted by telephone at one week (n = 65) and one month (n = 63) post intervention to assess treatment outcome (pain intensity and pain-related physical interference). RESULTS: At one week follow-up and one-month follow-up, using pain-related physical interference as the outcome measure, we found that those who responded well to treatment were characterized by a lower level of pretreatment anxiety and a higher level of pain acceptance, with anxiety being the strongest predictor. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that responses to interventional pain management in chronic myofascial paraspinous pain may be influenced by psychological characteristics, especially pretreatment anxiety.