Diagnosis and Management of Depression in Patients With Kidney Disease.

Depression disproportionately affects patients with kidney disease, including those with nondialysis chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. Patients across the spectrum of kidney disease should be screened for depression every 6 to 12 months using self-report questionnaires, followed by an interview with a clinician to confirm the presence of sadness or anhedonia when depressive symptoms are identified. Pharmacologic treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors has not consistently shown benefit compared with placebo and may be associated with serious adverse outcomes including cardiovascular events, bleeding, and fractures. However, based on the availability of alternative therapies, a watchful trial with close monitoring for therapeutic and adverse effects is reasonable. Several clinical trials have suggested that cognitive behavioral therapy and physical activity improve depressive symptoms when compared with a control group. Given the low risk associated with these therapies, they should be recommended to patients who have access and are amenable to such interventions. Future trials are needed to study therapeutic options for depression in nondialysis chronic kidney disease, peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplant recipients, as well as alternative pharmacologic therapy and combination therapies. Given improvement in depressive symptoms with placebo in existing trials, inclusion of a control group is paramount.

Management of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in CKD: What Are the Data?

Patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) are 10 times more likely to die of cardiovascular (CV) diseases than the general population, and dialysis-dependent patients are at even higher risk. Although traditional CV risk factors are highly prevalent in individuals with CKD, these patients were often excluded from studies targeting modification of these risks. Although treatment of hypertension is beneficial in CKD, the best target blood pressure has not been established. Trial data showed that renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade may prevent CV events in patients with CKD. The risks of aspirin may equal the benefits in NDD-CKD samples, and there are no trials testing aspirin in dialysis-dependent patients. Lipid-lowering therapy improves CV outcomes in NDD-CKD, but not in dialysis-dependent patients. Strict glycemic control prevents CV events in nonalbuminuric individuals, but showed no benefit in those with baseline albuminuria with albumin excretion > 300mg/g, and there are no data in dialysis-dependent patients. Data for lifestyle modifications, such as weight loss, physical activity, and smoking cessation, are mostly observational and extrapolated from non-CKD samples. This comprehensive review summarizes the best existing evidence and current clinical guidelines for modification of traditional risk factors for the prevention of CV events in patients with CKD and identifies knowledge gaps.

Recognition and Management of Resistant Hypertension.

Despite improvements in hypertension awareness and treatment, 30%-60% of hypertensive patients do not achieve BP targets and subsequently remain at risk for target organ damage. This therapeutic gap is particularly important to nephrologists, who frequently encounter treatment-resistant hypertension in patients with CKD. Data are limited on how best to treat patients with CKD and resistant hypertension, because patients with CKD have historically been excluded from hypertension treatment trials. First, we propose a consistent definition of resistant hypertension as BP levels confirmed by both in-office and out-of-office measurements that exceed appropriate targets while the patient is receiving treatment with at least three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic, at dosages optimized to provide maximum benefit in the absence of intolerable side effects. Second, we recommend that each patient undergo a standardized, stepwise evaluation to assess adherence to dietary and lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive medications to identify and reduce barriers and discontinue use of substances that may exacerbate hypertension. Patients in whom there is high clinical suspicion should be evaluated for potential secondary causes of hypertension. Evidence-based management of resistant hypertension is discussed with special considerations of the differences in approach to patients with and without CKD, including the specific roles of diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and the current place of emerging therapies, such as renal denervation and baroreceptor stimulation. We endorse use of such a systematic approach to improve recognition and care for this vulnerable patient group that is at high risk for future kidney and cardiovascular events.

Lactic acidosis in an HIV-infected patient receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: A 51-year-old man with HIV infection on highly active antiretroviral therapy presented with abdominal pain and exertional dyspnea. Physical examination revealed increased respiration and cachexia. Laboratory tests showed a lactic acid concentration elevated to 6.4 mM. INVESTIGATION: Physical examination, blood chemistry, arterial blood gas, urine analysis, chest X-ray, and ultrasound of liver. DIAGNOSIS: Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-induced lactic acidosis, hepatitis and chemical pancreatitis. Proximal renal tubular acidosis with Fanconi's syndrome, secondary to treatment with tenofovir. MANAGEMENT: The patient was supported on intravenous and oral bicarbonate, riboflavin and phosphorus supplementation. Highly active antiretroviral therapy was discontinued. The patient's lactate level decreased about 2 weeks after discharge.

Dialysis-related carnitine disorder.

L-carnitine plays an essential role in the beta-oxidation of fatty acids by catalyzing their transport into the mitochondrial matrix. The kidney maintains plasma free L-carnitine levels in the homeostatic range by selective saturable tubular reabsorption. The preferential retention of free L-carnitine over acyl-L-carnitines by the kidney is lost in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Loss of renal parenchyma as a site of carnitine synthesis, as well as nonselective clearance of L-carnitine by the dialysis procedure lead to dialysis-related carnitine deficiency. Numerous studies investigating whether L-carnitine supplementation will alleviate several dialysis-related symptoms, such as intradialytic hypotension, heart failure, muscle weakness, low exercise capacity, and anemia, have reported conflicting results. Many of these studies suffer from a lack of randomization and control groups, heterogeneity in the administration of L-carnitine, and nonstandardized measures of symptom improvement. More data exist to support the use of L-carnitine in selected anemic dialysis patients with very large erythropoietin requirements in whom extensive examination for reversible causes of anemia was unrevealing.