Current position of neuromodulation for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite established effectiveness in overactive bladder and nonobstructive retention, neuromodulation's application in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) remains a topic of ongoing research. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in neuromodulation as treatment of IC/BPS offering guidance for healthcare practitioners dealing with IC/BPS cases. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research underlines the promising role of sacral, tibial and pudendal neuromodulation in management of IC/BPS symptoms. Studies reveal encouraging outcomes, particularly in alleviating urgency and frequency symptoms. However, while urgency and frequency symptoms tend to improve, comprehensive pain relief remains a challenge. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) stand out due to their minimal invasive nature. Existing literature points to the need for larger prospective studies with extended follow-up periods to validate the efficacy and sustainability of neuromodulation. SUMMARY: Neuromodulation is a promising treatment modality for refractory IC/BPS. Due to the minimal invasive nature, they should be tried before rigorous surgery. However, the limited quantity of available data and the variability in pain relief outcomes necessitate cautious interpretation. The review emphasizes the need for further research.

What Is in the Pipeline on Investigational Neuromodulation Techniques for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: Overactive bladder (OAB) affects millions of patients worldwide. Its treatment is challenging but improves the patient's quality of life. Besides standard techniques for neuromodulation (sacral and pudendal neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation), several new techniques have been investigated to treat symptoms of refractory OAB. The purpose of the present review is to outline the state of the art of new neuromodulation techniques for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In March 2023, a comprehensive MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus search was carried out (keywords: LUTD, new technologies, neuromodulation, LUTS, OAB, painful bladder syndromes, etc). Articles were included according to inclusion (randomized controlled trials, prospective trials, large retrospective studies) and exclusion (case reports, outcomes not clearly expressed in full text, animal studies) criteria. The reference lists of the included studies also were scanned. Both adult and pediatric populations were included, in addition to both neurogenic and nonneurogenic OAB. A narrative review was then performed. RESULTS: Peroneal neuromodulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, magnetic nerve stimulation, and parasacral transcutaneous neuromodulation are the most studied investigative techniques and were shown to yield promising results in treating OAB symptoms. Most studies showed promising results even in the complex scenarios of patients with OAB refractory to standard treatments. Comparing investigational techniques with standard of care and their respective clinical outcomes and safety profiles, and confronting their pros and cons, we reasonably believe that once such treatment modalities are further developed, they could play a role in the OAB treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Although the described neuromodulation techniques are being intensely studied, the available results are not yet sufficient for any guidelines to recommend their use.

Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Children with Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Experiences, Quality of Life and Treatment Effect.

BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is one of the treatment modalities for children with therapy-refractory lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). This study used a mixed-methods analysis to gain insight into the experiences of children treated with PTNS and their parents, the effect of treatment on quality of life (QOL) and the effect of PTNS on urinary symptoms. METHODS: Quantitative outcomes were assessed through a single-centre retrospective chart analysis of all children treated with PTNS in a group setting between 2016-2021. Voiding parameters and QOL scores before and after treatment were compared. Qualitative outcomes were assessed by an explorative study involving semi-structured interviews transcribed verbatim and inductively analysed using the constant-comparative method. RESULTS: The data of 101 children treated with PTNS were analysed. Overall improvement of LUTD was seen in 42% and complete resolution in 10%. Average and maximum voided volumes significantly increased. QOL improved in both parents and children independent of the actual effect on urinary symptoms. Interviews revealed PTNS to be well-tolerated. Facilitating PTNS in a group setting led to feelings of recognition in both children and parents. CONCLUSIONS: PTNS is a good treatment in children with therapy-refractory LUTD and provides valuable opportunities for peer support if given in a group setting.

Long-term real-life adherence of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in over 400 patients.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is used as a treatment to reduce the complaints of overactive bladder (OAB). Although it is rewarding therapy patients need maintenance treatment to preserve the beneficial effect. AIM: This real-life retrospective study was performed to assess the feasibility of PTNS adherence. MATERIALS & METHODS: All patients who underwent PTNS were retrospectively included. We analyzed the following: indication, kind of treatments (pharmacologic and third-line therapy) before and after PTNS treatment, time and reason for quitting therapy. Statistical analysis was done by performing competitive-risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were categorized into four groups. Group 1: all patients; group 2: all patients on maintenance PTNS therapy (continuing after 12 weeks); group 3: patients on maintenance PTNS therapy excluding the following: (a) patients with initial good response who seized treatment due to death, (b) patient who successfully switched to transcutaneous stimulation, (c) patients who were cured of their OAB symptoms, or (d) patients who relocated; and group 4: group 3 but excluding those who stopped treatment because of nonmedical reasons (physical strain, inconveniencies associated with visiting the hospital). RESULTS: Four-hundred two patients (70% female) with a median age of 70 years underwent PTNS. Underlying treatment indications were: OAB-wet (54%) and OAB-dry (29%). The median follow-up (FU) of group 1 was 4 months. Fifty-seven percent (N = 228) of the patients received maintenance PTNS therapy. Median FU in group 4 was 46 months (range, 3-111 months). Over 40% of the maintenance patients stopped PTNS because of logistic reasons and physical strain during an FU time of 6 years. CONCLUSION: The real-world data described here with is in line with earlier published work in terms of the success rate of OAB treatment. However, over 40% quit their therapy due to nonmedical reasons.

A novel leadless, miniature implantable Tibial Nerve Neuromodulation System for the management of overactive bladder complaints.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder is a chronic condition affecting lower urinary tract function that has a significant negative impact on QoL. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the BlueWind implantable tibial nerve system performance and safety in refractory OAB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS INTERVENTION: A 6-month multi-center prospective intervention study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Objective assessment was done by voiding diary parameters including voids/day, volume voided/day, urgency assessment, leaking episodes/day, pads used/day, leak severity, and clinical success defined as a ≥50% reduction in the number of leaks/day or number of voids/day or number of episodes with degree of urgency >2 or a return to <8 voids/day on a 3 Day diary. Subjective assessment was based on OAB-q including HRQL and symptom severity score. Safety was evaluated by adverse event (AE) analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-four of the 36 implanted subjects completed the study. One subject withdrew voluntarily and one developed inflammation necessitating removal of the system. In the remaining subjects, 71% experienced clinical success at 6 months. Leaks/day, leak severity, and pad changes/day decreased significantly over time with 27.6% of urge incontinence subjects that became "dry." Voids/day, degree of urgency, volume/void, pads changed improved significantly. All quality of life aspects (concern, coping, sleep, and social) improved as well as symptom severity scores measured by the OAB-q. Adverse events included: implant site pain (13.9%), suspected infection (22.2%), and procedural wound complications (8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The BlueWind implantable tibial nerve stimulator is a safe, minimally invasive system that affords OAB patients significant improvements. PATIENT SUMMARY: The performance and safety of the BlueWind RENOVA™ implantable tibial nerve neuromodulator for OAB was tested. Our preliminary results demonstrate that the system has a low risk safety profile and may be considered an effective treatment option for OAB management.

A New Implanted Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulator for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: 3-Month Results of a Novel Therapy at a Single Center.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the safety and performance of a new implantable system for tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A battery-free stimulation device for tibial nerve stimulation (BlueWind Medical, Herzliya, Israel) was implanted in 15 patients. Safety and efficacy assessments were done at 3 months after activation with a 3-day bladder diary, a 24-hour pad test and 2 quality of life questionnaires. RESULTS: Two males and 13 females were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 54 years (range 19 to 72). Five of 15 patients were previously treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and 12 experienced urgency urinary incontinence. Median operative time was 34 minutes. At 3 months of followup a significant change was seen in 24-hour frequency from a mean ± SD of 11.8 ± 3.5 to 8.1 ± 2.0 times per day (p = 0.002), the number of severe urinary urgency episodes from 6.5 ± 5.1 to 2.0 ± 2.1 times per day (p = 0.002), the number of severe incontinence episodes from 2.8 ± 5.2 to 0.3 ± 0.4 episodes per day (p = 0.017), urinary loss per day from 243 ± 388 to 39 ± 55 gm (p = 0.038) and improvement in quality of life. After implantation, 3 patients received prolonged antibiotic treatment and 3 received pain medication for 1 week. In 1 patient the device was explanted due to pain and swelling suspicious for infection, although tissue cultures did not reveal a bacterial infection. CONCLUSIONS: This novel posterior tibial nerve stimulator is safe and easy to implant with good clinical results.

Dorsal genital nerve stimulation in patients with detrusor overactivity: a systematic review.

This study evaluates the outcome of trials to stimulate the dorsal genital nerve (DGN) in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. The aim of most studies was to suppress detrusor overactivity in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome by DGN stimulation. A literature search was performed using Pub Med, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (1980 to April 2012) for clinical trials of DGN stimulation in patients with detrusor overactivity. Seventeen studies were found in the literature. In the studies, different patterns of DGN stimulation were applied. The patterns were either continuous, conditional, or semi-conditional; on an acute or on a chronic basis. DGN stimulation lead to improvement of bladder capacity and reduction in urgency and/or incontinence episodes in many patients. The outcomes of conditional stimulation were comparable to continuous stimulation with respect to improvement of bladder capacity. The publications give evidence that DGN stimulation increases bladder capacity and suppresses involuntary detrusor contractions. Implantable DGN stimulation electrodes can open the way for more prolonged studies in larger patient groups to assess the effectiveness of chronic DGN stimulation in patients with OAB syndrome. Chronic DGN stimulation seems to be of value in the management of OAB syndrome.

Surgical access for electrical stimulation of the pudendal and dorsal genital nerves in the overactive bladder: a review.

PURPOSE: The anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its nerve branches, especially the dorsal nerve of the penis and clitoris (dorsal genital nerves), and the clinical application of electrical stimulation of these nerves in patients with overactive bladder syndrome and detrusor overactivity are reviewed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using the PubMed® database and reference lists of relevant studies to obtain articles concerning the anatomy as well as the electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerve and its nerve branches in patients with overactive bladder syndrome. RESULTS: According to the anatomy, electrical stimulation of the pudendal nerve and the dorsal genital nerves to suppress involuntary detrusor contractions is possible at several sites along their course from the sacral nerves to the penis or clitoris. The nerves are accessible by minimally invasive percutaneous methods. Stimulation of the pudendal nerve and dorsal genital nerves effectively increases bladder capacity, and inhibits involuntary detrusor contractions and overactive bladder symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: More clinically applied studies are recommended for stimulation of the dorsal genital nerves to assess its value and feasibility because most studies have been performed in an acute and experimental setting. The preferred type of electrode is not known, but if wire electrodes can be implanted and fixated well by a minimally invasive procedure, cuff electrodes are not necessary. Before deciding on continuous or conditional stimulation, chronic clinical studies are recommended because acute studies remain inconclusive. The feasibility of conditional stimulation depends on the availability of a reliable and clinically applicable detrusor activity sensor.

Quality of life in complete spinal cord injury patients with a Brindley bladder stimulator compared to a matched control group.

AIMS: To determine the effects on Quality of Life (QoL) of a Brindley procedure, which combines a sacral dorsal root rhizotomy to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity with sacral anterior root stimulation to enable micturition, defecation, and penile erections in complete spinal cord injury (SCI) patients compared to a matched Control Group. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. The Qualiveen questionnaire, SF-36 questionnaire, and multiple choice questions about urinary continence and urinary tract infections were sent to 93 patients who had a Brindley stimulator implanted in the Netherlands and a matched Control Group of 70 complete SCI patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Primary study outcomes were Specific Impact of Urinary Problems score and general QoL index of the Qualiveen. RESULTS: Response rates were 78% and 40% for patients with a Brindley stimulator and controls, respectively. Stimulators were still used for micturition in 46 (63%). These patients had a significant better Specific Impact of Urinary Problems score, general QoL index (Qualiveen), and continence rate, and less urinary tract infections compared to the Control Group. Patients also benefited of the rhizotomy with regard to QoL and continence rate if the stimulator was not used anymore. The subscales of the SF-36 had better scores for the patients who used their stimulator as compared to those who did not use the stimulator and compared to the Control Group. CONCLUSIONS: The Brindley stimulator for complete spinal cord injury patients improves Quality of Life, continence, and urinary tract infection rate compared to a matched Control Group.

Urodynamic evaluation of sacral neuromodulation for urge urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the urodynamic data before and 6 months after implantation of sacral neuromodulation (SNM, an established treatment for voiding dysfunction, including refractory urge urinary incontinence, UI) and to assess the correlation between the urodynamic data and clinical efficacy in patients with UI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 111 patients with a >50% reduction in UI symptoms during a percutaneous nerve evaluation test qualified for surgical implantation of SNM. Patients were categorized in two subgroups, i.e. those with UI with or without confirmed detrusor overactivity (DO) at baseline. At the 6-month follow-up all patients had a second urodynamic investigation, with the stimulator switched on. RESULTS: At baseline, there was urodynamically confirmed DO in 67 patients, while 44 showed no DO. A review of filling cystometry variables showed a statistically significant improvement in bladder volumes at first sensation of filling (FSF) and at maximum fill volume (MFV) before voiding for both UI subgroups, compared with baseline. In 51% of the patients with UI and DO at baseline, the DO resolved during the follow-up. However, those patients were no more clinically successful than those who still had DO (P = 0.73). At the 6-month follow-up, 55 of 84 implanted patients showed clinical benefit, having a >or=50% improvement in primary voiding diary variables. Patients with UI but no DO had a higher rate of clinical success (73%) than patients with UI and DO (61%), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These urodynamic results show a statistically significant improvement in FSF and MFV in patients with UI with or with no DO after SNM. Although there was a urodynamic and clinical improvement in both groups, patients with UI but no DO are at least as successful as patients with UI and DO. Therefore in patients with UI, DO should not be a prerequisite selection criterion for using SNM.

Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study.

PURPOSE: This 5-year, prospective, multicenter trial evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in patients with refractory urge incontinence, urgency frequency and retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 17 centers worldwide enrolled 163 patients (87% female). Following test stimulation 11 patients declined implantation and 152 underwent implantation using InterStim. Of those treated with implantation 96 (63.2%) had urge incontinence, 25 (16.4%) had urgency frequency and 31 (20.4%) had retention. Voiding diaries were collected annually for 5 years. Clinical success was defined as 50% or greater improvement from baseline in primary voiding diary variable(s). RESULTS: Data for all implanted cases were reported. For patients with urge incontinence mean leaking episodes per day decreased from 9.6 +/- 6.0 to 3.9 +/- 4.0 at 5 years. For patients with urgency frequency mean voids per day decreased from 19.3 +/- 7.0 to 14.8 +/- 7.6, and mean volume voided per void increased from 92.3 +/- 52.8 to 165.2 +/- 147.7 ml. For patients with retention the mean volume per catheterization decreased from 379.9 +/- 183.8 to 109.2 +/- 184.3 ml, and the mean number of catheterizations decreased from 5.3 +/- 2.8 to 1.9 +/- 2.8. All changes were statistically significant (p <0.001). No life threatening or irreversible adverse events occurred. In 102 patients 279 device or therapy related adverse events were observed. At 5 years after implantation 68% of patients with urge incontinence, 56% with urgency frequency and 71% with retention had successful outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term study demonstrates that InterStim therapy is safe and effective for restoring voiding in appropriately selected cases refractory to other forms of treatment.

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory overactive bladder syndrome: is maintenance treatment necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a pause in percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in successfully treated patients with an overactive bladder (OAB), and the reproducibility of successful treatment when restored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients (mean age 51 years) with refractory OAB (more than seven voids and/or three or more urge incontinence episodes per day) were successfully treated with PTNS, and then discontinued treatment. Patients completed bladder diaries and quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires (Short Form-36 and I-QoL) before (T1) and after a 6-week pause (T2) of maintenance PTNS, and again after re-treatment (T3). The first objective was defined as a > or = 50% increase in the incontinence episodes and/or voiding frequency in the bladder diary after T2. The second objective was defined as > or = 50% fewer incontinence episodes and/or voiding frequency in bladder diary after T3. RESULTS: At T2, seven of the 11 patients had a > or = 50% increase in incontinence episodes and/or voiding frequency in the bladder diary. The mean voided volume, nocturia, number of incontinence episodes and incontinence severity deteriorated significantly (P < 0.05). At T3, nine patients had > or = 50% fewer incontinence episodes and/or voiding frequency in the bladder diary. Nocturia, the number of incontinence episodes, incontinence severity, mean voided volume and quality of life improved significantly (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous therapy is necessary in patients with OAB treated successfully by PTNS. The efficacy of PTNS can be reproduced in patients formerly treated successfully.

Correlation between quality of life and voiding variables in patients treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between quality of life (QoL) and voiding variables in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), as it is assumed that improvements in voiding will lead to a better QoL in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 30 patients with urge urinary incontinence who were treated with PTNS; 24-h bladder diaries and QoL questionnaires (Short Form, SF-36, and incontinence-specific QoL) were completed at baseline and after PTNS. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation (P < 0.05) between the number of pads used and the SF-36 domains of physical and vitality, between the number of incontinence episodes and the SF-36 domains of physical and role physical, between nocturia and the SF-36 domains of general and mental health, between the mean voided volume and the SF-36 domains of role physical and final, and between the mean voided volume and the incontinence-specific QoL score. CONCLUSIONS: PTNS is useful for treating refractory urge incontinence and should at least be considered as a therapeutic alternative before resorting to aggressive surgery, as voiding and QoL variables significantly and quantifiably correlate in patients with refractory urge urinary incontinence who are treated with PTNS. Patients must have a reduction of >or = two pads/day before their QoL improves, and this might be the best definition of successful therapy for patients with urge urinary incontinence.

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of voiding dysfunction: urodynamic data.

OBJECTIVES: To determine urodynamic changes and predictive factors in patients with voiding dysfunction who underwent 12 percutaneous tibial nerve stimulations. METHODS: Thirty nine patients with chronic voiding dysfunction were enrolled in a prospective multicenter trial in the Netherlands (n = 19) and in Italy (n = 20). A 50% reduction in total catheterised volume per 24 hr was taken as a primary objective outcome measure. Patients' request for continuation of treatment was regarded as subjective success. Objective urodynamic parameters and bladder indices were determined. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence interval were computed as a measure for predictive power in order to reveal predictive factors (Pdet at Qmax, Qmax, BVE, and BCI). RESULTS: Primary outcome measure was obtained in 41%, an additional 26% reduced their 24 hr residuals with more than 25%. Fifty nine percent of patients chose to continue treatment. Detrusor pressure at maximal flow, cystometric residuals, and bladder indices improved significantly for all patients (P < 0.05). Patients with minor voiding dysfunction were more prone to notice success (Odds ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: PTNS is a young treatment modality, minimally invasive, and easily accessible. It might be an attractive first line option for patients with (minor) voiding dysfunction.

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder: urodynamic data.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate urodynamic changes after percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of complaints related to overactive bladder syndrome and to search for urodynamic-based predictive factors. METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients with symptoms related to overactive bladder syndrome were enrolled in this study. Patients underwent 12 PTNS sessions. For evaluating objective success, the primary outcome measure was a reduction in number of urinary leakage episodes of 50% or more per 24 hours. Patients' request for continuation of therapy was considered subjective success. This study focussed on urodynamic features at baseline and on changes found after 12 PTNS treatments. RESULTS: The objective success rate was 56% (leakages/24 hours). Subjective success rate was 64%. Frequency/volume chart data and quality of life scores improved significantly (P < 0.01). Pre- and posturodynamic data were available from 46 participants. Detrusor instabilities (DI) could be abolished in a few cases only. Increments in cystometric bladder capacity and in volume at DI were significant (P = 0.043 and 0.012, respectively). Subjects without detrusor instabilities at baseline were 1.7 times more prone to respond to PTNS (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-4.6). The more the bladder overactivity was pronounced, the less these patients were found to respond to PTNS, the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.644 (95% CI, 0.48-0.804). CONCLUSION: PTNS could not abolish DI. PTNS increased cystometric capacity and delayed the onset of DI. Cystometry seemed useful to select good candidates: patients without DI or with late DI onset proved to be the best candidates for PTNS.

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of idiopathic nonobstructive voiding dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve in the treatment of voiding dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with chronic voiding dysfunction necessitating clean intermittent catheterization were enrolled in a prospective multicenter trial in the Netherlands (n = 19) and Italy (n = 20). They underwent 12 weekly sessions of posterior tibial nerve stimulation. Frequency/volume charts, an incontinence quality-of-life instrument, and the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey were completed at 0 and 12 weeks. Subjective success was defined by the patient's positive response resulting in a request to continue treatment. Efficacy was based on analysis of the frequency/volume charts comparing the baseline values with the data at 12 weeks. A reduction of 50% or more in total catheterized volume was considered as an objective success (primary outcome measurement). RESULTS: Of the 39 patients, 23 (59%) chose to continue treatment. The frequency/volume charts showed a 50% decrease in total catheterized volume in 16 (41%) of 39 patients. Additionally, 10 patients (26%) noted a reduction of 25% to 50% in their total catheterized volume. For all patients, the total catheterized volume decreased by a mean of -228 mL (range -49 to -528). The incontinence quality-of-life instrument and Short-Form Health Survey parameters improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve seems to be an effective, minimally invasive option worth trying in patients with idiopathic voiding dysfunction. Improvement was seen in objective micturition parameters, as well as in subjective quality-of-life data.

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation as neuromodulative treatment of chronic pelvic pain.

PURPOSE: Neuromodulative therapies have been used with moderate success in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Intermittent Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) is a new, minimally invasive treatment option, which has shown to significantly decrease accompanying pain complaints in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction, such as urge incontinence or urgency/frequency. In our study, we evaluate the objective results of PTNS in patients with chronic pelvic pain as their main complaint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicentre trial PTNS was evaluated in 33 patients with chronic pelvic pain. Effects were recorded by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain diaries, the McGill pain questionnaire and the SF-36 general quality of life questionnaire at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Subjective (patients' request to continue chronic treatment to keep the obtained success) and objective responses (decrease in mean VAS >50% and VAS <3 after treatment) were evaluated. RESULTS: A subjective response was seen in 42% of all patients. In seven patients (21%) mean VAS decreased >50%, in six cases (18%) the decrease was >25%. After 12 weeks of treatment, seven patients (21%) ended up with a mean VAS <3. In all patients quality of life (SF-36) significantly improved, as did the total pain rate intensity (McGill). CONCLUSIONS: Despite very modest overall success rates and the need for placebo-controlled studies, PTNS may have a place in the treatment of patients with chronic pelvic pain who have already tried many other therapies and are left with no further option.

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of urge incontinence.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for treatment of urge incontinence. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre study, 35 patients with complaints of urge incontinence underwent 12 weekly sessions of PTNS at one of five sites in the Netherlands and one site in Italy. Frequency/volume charts and I-QoL and SF-36 questionnaires were completed at 0 and 12 weeks. Success was analysed by using subjective and objective criteria. Overall subjective success was defined as the willingness to continue treatment, whereas objective success was defined as a significant decrease (to<50%) in total number of leakage episodes. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (63%) reported a subjective success. Twenty-four patients (70%) showed a 50% or greater reduction in total number of leakage episodes. Sixteen (46%) of these-patients were completely cured (i.e., no leakage episodes) after 12 sessions. Quality of life parameters improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that posterior tibial nerve stimulation is an effective, minimally invasive option for treatment of patients with complaints of urge incontinence, as improvement was seen in subjective as well as objective parameters.