Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 130(1): e14-e18, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31335399

RESUMO

Deciding whether to pursue elective surgery is a complex process for older adults. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can help refine estimates of benefits and risks, at times leading to a delay of surgery to optimize surgical readiness. We describe a cohort of geriatric patients who were evaluated in anticipation of elective abdominal surgery and whose procedures were delayed for any reason. Themes behind the reasons for delay are described, and a holistic framework to guide preoperative discussion is suggested.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Agendamento de Consultas , Comportamento de Escolha , Comorbidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Avaliação Geriátrica , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Veteranos , Listas de Espera
3.
JAMA Surg ; 153(5): 454-462, 2018 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29299599

RESUMO

Importance: Older adults undergoing elective surgery experience higher rates of preventable postoperative complications than younger patients. Objective: To assess clinical outcomes for older adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery via a collaborative intervention by surgery, geriatrics, and anesthesia focused on perioperative health optimization. Design, Setting, and Participants: Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) is a quality improvement initiative with prospective data collection. Participants in an existing geriatrics-based clinic within a single-site academic health center were included if they were at high risk for complications (ie, older than 85 years or older than 65 years with cognitive impairment, recent weight loss, multimorbidity, or polypharmacy) undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Outcomes were compared with a control group of patients older than 65 years who underwent similar surgeries by the same group of general surgeons immediately before implementation of POSH. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included length of stay, 7- and 30-day readmissions, and level of care at discharge. Secondary outcomes were delirium and other major postoperative complications. Outcomes data were derived from institutional databases linked with electronic health records and billing data sets. Results: One hundred eighty-three POSH patients were compared with 143 patients in the control group. On average, patients in the POSH group were older compared with those in the control group (75.6 vs 71.9 years; P < .001; 95% CI, 2.27 to 5.19) and had more chronic conditions (10.6 vs 8.5; P = .001; 95% CI, 0.86 to 3.35). Median length of stay was shorter among POSH patients (4 days vs 6 days; P < .001; 95% CI, -1.06 to -4.21). Patients in the POSH group had lower readmission rates at 7 days (5 of 180 [2.8%] vs 14 of 142 [9.9%]; P = .007; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.74) and 30 days (14 of 180 [7.8%] vs 26 of 142 [18.3%]; P = .004; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.75) and were more likely to be discharged home with self-care (114 of 183 [62.3%] vs 73 of 143 [51.1%]; P = .04; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.47). Patients in the POSH group experienced fewer mean number of complications (0.9 vs 1.4; P < .001; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.89) despite higher rates of documented delirium (52 of 183 [28.4%] vs 8 of 143 [5.6%]; P < .001; 95% CI, 3.06 to 14.65). A greater proportion of POSH patients underwent laparoscopic procedures (92 of 183 [50%] vs 55 of 143 [38.5%]; P = .001; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.52). Tests for interactions between POSH patients and procedure type were insignificant for all outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite higher mean age and morbidity burden, older adults who participated in an interdisciplinary perioperative care intervention had fewer complications, shorter hospitalizations, more frequent discharge to home, and fewer readmissions than a comparison group.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Morbidade/tendências , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Anesth Analg ; 126(2): 682-690, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29200059

RESUMO

Health care delivery in the United States continues to balance on the tight rope that connects its transition from volume to value. Value in economic terms can be defined as the amount something exceeds its commodity price and is determined by extraordinary reputation, quality, and/or service, whereas its destruction can be a consequence of poor management, unfavorable policy, decreased demand, and/or increased competition. Going forward, payment for health care delivery will increasingly be based on services that contribute to improvements in individual and/or population health value, and funds to pay for health care delivery will become increasingly vulnerable to competitive market forces. Therefore, a sustainable population health strategy needs to be comprehensive and thus include perioperative medicine as an essential component of the complete cycle of patient-centered care. We describe a multidisciplinary integrated program to support perioperative medicine services that are integral to a comprehensive population health strategy.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Saúde da População , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/tendências , Assistência Perioperatória/tendências
5.
J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr ; 31(2): 158-71, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22607104

RESUMO

Randomized controlled trials have shown that adequate vitamin D supplementation in nursing home (NH) residents reduces the rates of falls and fractures. In our NH, review of medication administration records of all patients (n = 101) revealed that only 34.6% of the patients were currently prescribed adequate doses of vitamin D, revealing a need for intervention. We designed a Quality Improvement (QI) project with the objective of improving the vitamin D prescription rate in our NH. We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to implement this QI project. Patients not currently prescribed an adequate dose of vitamin D were identified and started on a daily dose of 800 IU of vitamin D. Additionally, patients who were experiencing falls while on an adequate dose of vitamin D for 3 months were examined for the possibility of vitamin D deficiency and were started on 50,000 IU of vitamin D per week for 12 weeks if they were found to be vitamin D-deficient based on blood levels of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D below 30 ng/mL. We found that with several PDSA cycles over a period of 5 months, the prescription rate for vitamin D was increased to 86%, surpassing our initial goal of 80%. In conclusion, we found that a multidisciplinary QI program utilizing multiple PDSA cycles was effective in reaching target prescription rates for vitamin D supplementation in a population of NH patients.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Enfermagem Geriátrica/métodos , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Casas de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina , Vitamina D/uso terapêutico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/dietoterapia , Deficiência de Vitamina D/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA