Patients Desire Personalized, Specific, and Continuous Advice on Weight Management.

OBJECTIVE: To deliver effective care, healthcare systems should understand patients' preferences for weight management across a spectrum of needs. Our objective was to describe patients' perceptions of what helps or hinders weight loss and maintenance. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients who accessed weight management services at a large integrated health system in 2018. The interview guide was developed and iteratively refined through a literature search and by consulting experts. Questions included the respondent's weight history, interactions with the health system, and current health status. The analysis used a grounded theory approach, and each transcript was double-coded in 2019. Codes were sorted into themes. All discrepancies were resolved through team discussion. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were interviewed. The majority of respondents (87%) reported multiple weight loss attempts. Three themes were identified. First, advice should be matched to a patient's knowledge and prior experience (eg, using bariatric deck cards). As patients progressed, clinician advice also needed to advance (eg, explaining how to expand food options instead of defining a healthy diet). Second, respondents had a variety of motivating factors, and understanding where motivation is generated from can inform how to design a weight management approach. Third, patients need continual and long-term advice. Some respondents feared becoming ineligible for services if their weight dropped too much. CONCLUSIONS: Health systems can support patients by developing processes for identifying the extent of a patient's knowledge and giving personalized advice based on the patient's preferences and experiences. Reassessing needs at defined intervals may help patients attain and sustain their goals.

Factors Impacting Physician Referral To and Patient Attendance at Weight Management Programs Within a Large Integrated Health System.

BACKGROUND: Identifying which patients receive referrals to and which ones attend weight management programs can provide insights into how physicians manage obesity. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient factors associated with referrals, which primarily reflect physician priorities, and attendance, which reflects patient priorities. We also examine the influence of the individual physician by comparing adjusted rates of referral and attendance across physicians. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who had a primary care visit between 2015 and 2018 at a large integrated health system MAIN MEASURES: Referrals and visits to programs were collected from the EHR in 2019 and analyzed in 2019-2020. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to identify the association between patient characteristics and (1) receiving a referral, and (2) attending a visit after a referral. We compared physicians' adjusted probabilities of referring patients and of their patients attending a visit. KEY RESULTS: Our study included 160,163 adults, with a median BMI of 35 kg/m2. Seventeen percent of patients received ≥ 1 referral and 29% of those attended a visit. The adjusted odds of referral increased 57% for patients with a BMI 35-39 (versus 30-34) and 32% for each comorbidity (p < 0.01). Attending a visit was less strongly associated with BMI (aOR 1.18 for 35-39 versus 30-34, 95% CI 1.09-1.27) and not at all with comorbidity. For the physician-level analysis, the adjusted probability of referral had a much wider range (0 to 83%; mean = 19%) than did the adjusted probability of attendance (range 27 to 34%). CONCLUSIONS: Few patients attended a weight management program. Physicians vary greatly in their probability of referring patients to programs but not in their patients' probability of attending.

Psychological considerations for bariatric surgery among older adults.

Older adults are increasing in weight along with the rest of the United States population. Likewise, their rates of bariatric surgery have been on the rise with changes in insurance coverage, evidence of the safety of surgery, and importance of quality of life during older age. Unfortunately, limited research has addressed the unique experiences of older adults and there are no specific guidelines that provide an effective strategy for presurgical psychological evaluation of this group. Therefore, this review aims to address considerations for psychological evaluation of older adults by adapting the current guidelines available, within the framework of a "patient-centered" approach that emphasizes individual needs. Considerations reviewed include psychosocial (e.g., developmental stage, quality of life, level of stress, and coping ability) and cognitive concerns (e.g., capacity to give informed consent, realistic expectations, and adherence to permanent lifestyle change).