The increasing importance of LNAA supplementation in phenylketonuria at higher plasma phenylalanine concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Large neutral amino acid (LNAA) treatment has been suggested as alternative to the burdensome severe phenylalanine-restricted diet. While its working mechanisms and optimal composition have recently been further elucidated, the question whether LNAA treatment requires the natural protein-restricted diet, has still remained. OBJECTIVE: Firstly, to determine whether an additional liberalized natural protein-restricted diet could further improve brain amino acid and monoamine concentrations in phenylketonuria mice on LNAA treatment. Secondly, to compare the effect between LNAA treatment (without natural protein) restriction and different levels of a phenylalanine-restricted diet (without LNAA treatment) on brain amino acid and monoamine concentrations in phenylketonuria mice. DESIGN: BTBR Pah-enu2 mice were divided into two experimental groups that received LNAA treatment with either an unrestricted or semi phenylalanine-restricted diet. Control groups included Pah-enu2 mice on the AIN-93 M diet, a severe or semi phenylalanine-restricted diet without LNAA treatment, and wild-type mice receiving the AIN-93 M diet. After ten weeks, brain and plasma samples were collected to measure amino acid profiles and brain monoaminergic neurotransmitter concentrations. RESULTS: Adding a semi phenylalanine-restricted diet to LNAA treatment resulted in lower plasma phenylalanine but comparable brain amino acid and monoamine concentrations as compared to LNAA treatment (without phenylalanine restriction). LNAA treatment (without phenylalanine restriction) resulted in comparable brain monoamine but higher brain phenylalanine concentrations compared to the severe phenylalanine-restricted diet, and significantly higher brain monoamine but comparable phenylalanine concentrations as compared to the semi phenylalanine-restricted diet. CONCLUSIONS: Present results in PKU mice suggest that LNAA treatment in PKU patients does not need the phenylalanine-restricted diet. In PKU mice, LNAA treatment (without phenylalanine restriction) was comparable to a severe phenylalanine-restricted diet with respect to brain monoamine concentrations, notwithstanding the higher plasma and brain phenylalanine concentrations, and resulted in comparable brain phenylalanine concentrations as on a semi phenylalanine-restricted diet.

The 48-hour tetrahydrobiopterin loading test in patients with phenylketonuria: evaluation of protocol and influence of baseline phenylalanine concentration.

BACKGROUND: The 24- and 48-hour tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) loading test (BLT) performed at a minimum baseline phenylalanine concentration of 400 µmol/l is commonly used to test phenylketonuria patients for BH4 responsiveness. This study aimed to analyze differences between the 24- and 48-hour BLT and the necessity of the 400 µmol/l minimum baseline phenylalanine concentration. METHODS: Data on 186 phenylketonuria patients were collected. Patients were supplemented with phenylalanine if phenylalanine was <400 µmol/l. BH4 20mg/kg was administered at T = 0 and T = 24. Blood samples were taken at T=0, 8, 16, 24 and 48 h. Responsiveness was defined as ≥ 30% reduction in phenylalanine concentration at ≥ 1 time point. RESULTS: Eighty-six (46.2%) patients were responsive. Among responders 84% showed a ≥ 30% response at T = 48. Fifty-three percent had their maximal decrease at T = 48. Fourteen patients had ≥ 30% phenylalanine decrease not before T = 48. A ≥ 30% decrease was also seen in patients with phenylalanine concentrations <400 µmol/l. CONCLUSION: In the 48-hour BLT, T = 48 seems more informative than T = 24. Sampling at T = 32, and T = 40 may have additional value. BH4 responsiveness can also be predicted with baseline blood phenylalanine <400 µmol/l, when the BLT is positive. Therefore, if these results are confirmed by data on long-term BH4 responsiveness, we advise to first perform a BLT without phenylalanine loading and re-test at higher phenylalanine concentrations when no response is seen. Most likely, the 48-hour BLT is a good indicator for BH4 responsiveness, but comparison with long term responsiveness is necessary.