Longitudinal Fluctuations in Treatment Response After OnabotulinumToxinA and Sacral Neuromodulation for Refractory Urgency Incontinence.

PURPOSE: We compared fluctuations in treatment response after onabotulinumtoxinA and sacral neuromodulation for urgency incontinence using Markov models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We fit data from a randomized trial to Markov models to compare transitions of success/failure over 6 months between 200 U onabotulinumtoxinA and sacral neuromodulation. Objective failure was <50% reduction in urgency incontinence episodes from baseline; subjective failure "strongly disagree" to "neutral" to the Patient Global Symptom Control questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 357 participants (median baseline daily urgency incontinence episodes 4.7 [IQR 3.7-6.0]) 61% vs 51% and 3.2% vs 6.1% reported persistent states of objective success and failure over 6 months after onabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation. Participants receiving onabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation had lower 30-day transition probabilities from objective and subjective success to failure (10% vs 14%, ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.55-0.95]; 14% vs 21%, ratio 0.70 [95% CI 0.51-0.89]). The 30-day transition probability from objective and subjective failure to success did not differ between onabotulinumtoxinA and sacral neuromodulation (40% vs 36%, ratio 1.11 [95% CI 0.73-1.50]; 18% vs 17%, ratio 1.14 [95% CI 0.65-1.64]). CONCLUSIONS: Over 6 months after treatment, 2 in 5 women's symptoms fluctuate. Within these initial 6 months, women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA transitioned from success to failure over 30 days less often than sacral neuromodulation. For both treatments, there was an almost 20%-40% probability over 30 days that women returned to subjective and objective success after failure. Markov models add important information to longitudinal models on how symptoms fluctuate after urgency incontinence treatment.

Sacral neuromodulation: troubleshooting needle placement.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to develop an instructional video that utilizes fluoroscopic images and anatomical landmarks to increase the surgeon's ability to troubleshoot optimal placement of the foramen needle and lead during a stage I sacral neuromodulation (SNM) procedure. METHODS: Eight different examples of suboptimal foramen needle placement with subsequent corrections during a SNM procedure were performed and recorded on a fresh female cadaver. RESULTS: Fluoroscopic images were obtained during the procedure, and illustrations of the posterior aspect of the sacrum highlighting the S3 foramina and nerve are shown for anatomical comparison. CONCLUSIONS: This video demonstrates how to efficiently identify and correct suboptimal foramen needle placement in order to obtain optimal lead placement during an SNM procedure. Understanding the relationship between the bony landmarks on fluoroscopy and the S3 nerve and foramen are important in order to understand how to correct a suboptimal foramen needle and thus achieve optimal lead placement.

Sacral neuromodulation: sacral anatomy and optimal lead placement.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOSTHESIS: To develop an instructional video that correlates cadaveric anatomy with fluoroscopic images to assist in conceptualization of optimal placement of the foramen needle and lead to complete an efficient and successful sacral neuromodulation (SNM) procedure. METHODS: A SNM procedure was performed and recorded on a fresh female cadaver. Fluoroscopic images were obtained during the procedure to highlight the bony relationships to the S3 foramen and nerve. Dissection of the anterior and posterior sacrum was completed to highlight the tract of the S3 nerve. Techniques to increase the likelihood of optimal foramen needle and thus lead placement were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: This video demonstrates how achieving optimal foramen needle placement within the S3 foramen is key to optimal lead placement. Understanding the relationship of the bony landmarks on fluoroscopy to the S3 nerve and foramen, seen in the cadaveric dissections, are important in understanding how to achieve optimal lead placement. This optimization should lead to decreased operating room time, maximization of programming options, and decreased amplitude requirements.