Preservation of deep epigastric perforators during anterior component separation technique (ACST) results in equivalent wound complications compared to transversus abdominis release (TAR).

PURPOSE: The use of component separation results in myofascial release and increased rates of fascial closure in abdominal wall reconstruction(AWR). These complex dissections have been associated with increased rates of wound complications with anterior component separation having the greatest wound morbidity. The aim of this paper was to compare the wound complication rate between perforator sparing anterior component separation(PS-ACST) and transversus abdominus release(TAR). METHODS: Patients were identified from a prospective, single institution hernia center database who underwent PS-ACST and TAR from 2015 to 2021. The primary outcome was wound complication rate. Standard statistical methods were used, univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients met criteria, 39 had PS-ACST and 133 had TAR performed. The PS-ACST and TAR groups were similar in terms of diabetes (15.4% vs 28.6%, p = 0.097), but the PS-ACST group had a greater percentage of smokers (46.2% vs 14.3%, p < 0.001). The PS-ACST group had a larger hernia defect size (375.2 ± 156.7 vs 234.4 ± 126.9cm2, p < 0.001) and more patients who underwent preoperative Botulinum toxin A (BTA) injections (43.6% vs 6.0%, p < 0.001). The overall wound complication rate was not significantly different (23.1% vs 36.1%, p = 0.129) nor was the mesh infection rate (0% vs 1.6%, p = 0.438). Using logistic regression, none of the factors that were significantly different in the univariate analysis were associated with wound complication rate (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PS-ACST and TAR are comparable in terms of wound complication rates. PS-ACST can be used for large hernia defects and promote fascial closure with low overall wound morbidity and perioperative complications.

Embolization therapy as an alternative to thoracotomy in vascular injuries of the chest wall.

Hemothorax and persistent thoracic bleeding is frequently an indication for thoracotomy after trauma. Unfortunately, the source of the hemorrhage is often not identified. Presently, selective arteriography and transcatheter embolization (SATE) offers a good and safe alternative to localize and control hemorrhage from arterial injuries in selected patients. The records of eight patients who underwent SATE were reviewed. There were six blunt and two penetrating chest injuries. Four patients had significant preexisting medical comorbidities. Three patients with blunt injuries had undergone exploratory thoracotomy, but continued to bleed postoperatively. In three patients, angiography was indicated for associated thoracic and pelvic injuries, and five patients had SATE specifically due to thoracic hemorrhage. In all patients, SATE was effective to diagnose and control the hemorrhage. There were no complications related to the SATE procedure. Two patients died secondary to severe cerebral injuries. Given hemodynamic stability, SATE can be considered in patients who have already had a thoracotomy, have significant associated medical conditions, or those in need of other angiographic studies. Careful technique and a readiness to abandon SATE in unstable patients or when a suitable catheter position cannot be achieved are important technical points.