A hybrid type I, multi-center randomized controlled trial to study the implementation of a method for Sustained cord circulation And VEntilation (the SAVE-method) of late preterm and term neonates: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: An intact umbilical cord allows the physiological transfusion of blood from the placenta to the neonate, which reduces infant iron deficiency and is associated with improved development during early childhood. The implementation of delayed cord clamping practice varies depending on mode of delivery, as well as gestational age and neonatal compromise. Emerging evidence shows that infants requiring resuscitation would benefit if respiratory support were provided with the umbilical cord intact. Common barriers to providing intact cord resuscitation is the availability of neonatal resuscitation equipment close to the mother, organizational readiness for change as well as attitudes and beliefs about placental transfusion within the multidisciplinary team. Hence, clinical evaluations of cord clamping practice should include implementation outcomes in order to develop strategies for optimal cord management practice. METHODS: The Sustained cord circulation And Ventilation (SAVE) study is a hybrid type I randomized controlled study combining the evaluation of clinical outcomes with implementation and health service outcomes. In phase I of the study, a method for providing in-bed intact cord resuscitation was developed, in phase II of the study the intervention was adapted to be used in multiple settings. In phase III of the study, a full-scale multicenter study will be initiated with concurrent evaluation of clinical, implementation and health service outcomes. Clinical data on neonatal outcomes will be recorded at the labor and neonatal units. Implementation outcomes will be collected from electronic surveys sent to parents as well as staff and managers within the birth and neonatal units. Descriptive and comparative statistics and regression modelling will be used for analysis. Quantitative data will be supplemented by qualitative methods using a thematic analysis with an inductive approach. DISCUSSION: The SAVE study enables the safe development and evaluation of a method for intact cord resuscitation in a multicenter trial. The study identifies barriers and facilitators for intact cord resuscitation. The knowledge provided from the study will be of benefit for the development of cord clamping practice in different challenging clinical settings and provide evidence for development of clinical guidelines regarding optimal cord clamping. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04070560 . Registered 28 August 2019.

Internet-based Treatment for Vulvodynia (EMBLA) - A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Internet-based ACT (Acceptance and commitment therapy) treatment may improve accessibility and reduce stigma related to seeking health care, but there are a lack of studies investigating internet-based treatment using ACT principles for women with vulvodynia. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an internet-based treatment of pain during intercourse for women with provoked vulvodynia compared with no intervention during the waiting period before clinical treatment. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted during 2016 to 2020, in which 99 participants were included. Participants were randomized to either a 6 week guided internet-based treatment using ACT principles or usual care. Data were collected at baseline, 6 weeks after baseline, and approximately 10 months after baseline. OUTCOMES: Pain-related (pain during intercourse, tampon test, impact of pain on sexual function) and pain behavior-related outcomes (attempts at intercourse, sexual activities besides intercourse, willingness to perform the tampon test, chronic pain acceptance questionnaire) were used as outcomes. RESULTS: Treatment was efficacious in what concerns pain during intercourse and pain acceptance. Less pain during intercourse among women in the intervention group was observed at both post-treatment (primary endpoint, P = .01, Cohen's d = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.33, 2.4), and follow-up (P = .04). Absolut mean difference between groups for pain during intercourse at post-treatment was -2.84, (95 % CI = -4.91, -0.78), and -1.58 at follow-up, (95 % CI = -3.17, 0.02), where the intervention group rated less pain than controls. No differences between groups over time were found for tampon test measures or impact of pain on sexual function. There was a significant difference between groups at all timepoints indicating fewer attempts at intercourse among participants in the intervention group. At post-treatment, women who underwent internet-based treatment reported higher pain acceptance and a rise in activity engagement compared with the control group. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is an indication that internet-based treatment could be incorporated into clinical practice as a complement to clinical treatment. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Study strengths included using several forms of recruitment and an intervention built by different professions with long experience of treating patients with vulvodynia. High dropout rate was a limitation of this study. CONCLUSION: Internet-based treatment may have an impact on pain during intercourse and positive effects on pain acceptance. However, conclusions must be drawn with caution due to the small sample size. Engström AH, Bohm-Starke N, Kullinger M, et al. Internet-based Treatment for Vulvodynia (EMBLA) - A Randomized Controlled Study. J Sex Med 2022;19:319-330.

Episiotomy or not? Midwives' experiences of recruiting to a randomized controlled trial during pregnancy and labor - A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: The performance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is dependent on recruitment. Recruiting women to RCTs regarding interventions during childbirth may be difficult due to time constraints and their vulnerable situation. Midwives play a major role in such recruitment. Few studies have investigated the views and experiences of recruiters. The aim of this study was to describe midwives' experiences of recruiting pregnant women regarding an RCT of lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 19 midwives were interviewed regarding their experiences. The midwives worked at antenatal health care centers or labor wards. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories appeared during the analysis, including "experiences and perceptions of providing trial information" and "the right timing in providing trial information," which varied among the midwives. Midwives' perceptions of how the women provided consent or declined participation, and the women's views and questions about the randomization and intervention, were summarized as "experiences of how the trial information was received by the women." In the final category, "perceived trial apprehensions and concerns," some midwives described ethical concerns related to the intervention and financial compensation to the staff involved. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives as recruiters would benefit from education and training in incorporating basic and advanced details of trial design and research methods, as well as training and support in recruitment. Awareness and management of the variation among potential recruiters is important when designing and performing an RCT.