Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 117: 120-125, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29704587

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if urodynamic findings other than high-pressure voiding influence the decision to perform a transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). METHODS: Four clinical scenarios were created featuring a healthy 65-year-old man. An electronic survey was distributed to members of the International Continence Society and the Society for Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. RESULTS: Eighty-six urologists responded (median age was 45-54 years, 62% described their practice as academic). Scenario 1: an incidental residual urine >1 L with detrusor underactivity. The majority (76%) would offer a TURP; however, the estimated chance that the residual volume would improve was only 57%. Scenario 2: retention with detrusor overactivity but no voluntary voiding contraction. The majority (72%) would offer a TURP; however, the average chance quoted that he would void was only 48%. Scenario 3: catheter-dependent retention and an underactive detrusor. The majority (89%) would offer a TURP; however, the average chance quoted that he would void was only 53%. Scenario 4: a man with only frequency and urgency, but urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction. The majority (90%) would offer him a TURP; however, the average chance that his frequency and urgency would improve was only 64%, and the average estimated postoperative risk of urgency incontinence was 33%. Willingness to offer TURP did not correlate with physician characteristics. CONCLUSION: Urodynamic findings other than bladder outlet obstruction were associated with modest perceived outcomes after TURP; however, despite this, urologists are still willing to offer this intervention.


Assuntos
Padrões de Prática Médica , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia , Urologia , Idoso , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/fisiopatologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Cateterismo Urinário , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/fisiopatologia , Retenção Urinária/terapia , Urodinâmica
2.
Curr Urol Rep ; 13(5): 356-62, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22872500

RESUMO

Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in women can be either anatomic or functional. Anatomic causes for BOO are often readily apparent by history and physical exam. On the other hand, causes for functional obstruction, including dysfunctional voiding, primary bladder neck obstruction, and detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia, are more difficult to establish. Because the appropriate treatment for functional obstruction drastically varies according to etiology, making an accurate diagnosis is paramount. Videourodynamics, interpreted in the context of individual clinical symptoms, remains the diagnostic gold standard in women with functional obstruction.


Assuntos
Cistoscopia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Bexiga Urinária/anormalidades , Biorretroalimentação Psicológica , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Feminino , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Diafragma da Pelve/fisiopatologia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Urodinâmica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA