Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: The duration of time for which the serum levels exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is an important pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) parameter correlating with efficacy for the antibiotic, ceftriaxone (CTRX). However, no reports exist regarding the PK or PD in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The purpose of this study was to examine the PK and safety of CTRX in patients undergoing CRRT in order to establish safer and more effective regimens. METHODS: CTRX (1 g once a day) was intravenously administered four or more times to nine patients undergoing CRRT. Blood was collected after administration to measure CTRX concentrations in serum and the filtration fraction of CRRT by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition to calculating PK parameters from serum CTRX, we (a) estimated by simulation CTRX concentrations when the dose interval was extended to once every 2 or 3 days, (b) calculated CTRX clearance via CRRT from CTRX concentrations in the filtration fraction, and (c) assessed the safety of CTRX use. RESULTS: Total body clearance and the half-life of CTRX were 7.46 mL/min (mean) and 26.5 h, respectively, in patients undergoing CRRT. CTRX was found in the filtration fraction, and the estimated clearance by CRRT was about 70% of total body clearance. Simulations revealed that even when the dose interval is increased to 2 or 3 days, CTRX would retain its efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, depending on the condition of patients undergoing CRRT, CTRX could be used safely against pathogens with a CTRX MIC ≤2 µg/mL, even when extending the dose interval.

The impact of oxidative stress levels on the clinical effectiveness of sivelestat in treating acute lung injury: an electron spin resonance study.

BACKGROUND: Sivelestat, a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, has been used to treat acute lung injury (ALI) with varying levels of clinical success. Variable baseline levels of oxidative stress in patients with ALI have been proposed as one explanation for inconsistent results. METHODS: Using a bedside electron spin resonance spectrometer, we evaluated electron spin resonance signal intensities of serum ascorbyl free radicals supplemented with dimethyl sulfoxide (AFR/DMSO) in patients with ALI. RESULTS: We found a positive correlation between AFR/DMSO and ascorbate levels, suggesting that serum AFR/DMSO measurements may serve as a surrogate for real-time assessments of oxidative stress. Levels of AFR/DMSO in patients with ALI were significantly lower than those found in healthy controls. Stratified analyses revealed that baseline AFR/DMSO levels were significantly lower in patients with ALI who failed to respond to sivelestat compared with those who did respond. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the clinical efficacy of sivelestat is dependent on baseline oxidative stress levels.