Bridge to Health/Puente a la Salud: a pilot randomized trial to address diabetes self-management and social needs among high-risk patients.

Social needs contribute to persistent diabetes disparities; thus, it is imperative to address social needs to optimize diabetes management. The purpose of this study was to determine determine the feasibility and acceptability of health system-based social care versus social care + behavioral intervention to address social needs and improve diabetes self-management among patients with type 2 diabetes. Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and low-income White patients with recent hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥ 8%, and ≥1 social need were recruited from an integrated health system. Patients were randomized to one-of-two 6-month interventions: (a) navigation to resources (NAV) facilitated by a Patient Navigator; or (b) NAV + evidence-based nine-session diabetes self-management support (DSMS) program facilitated by a community health worker (CHW). A1C was extracted from the electronic health record. We successfully recruited 110 eligible patients (54 NAV; 56 NAV + DSMS). During the trial, 78% NAV and 80% NAV + DSMS participants successfully connected to a navigator; 84% NAV + DSMS connected to a CHW. At 6-month follow-up, 33% of NAV and 34% of NAV + DSMS participants had an A1C < 8%. Mean reduction in A1C was clinically significant in NAV (-0.65%) and NAV + DSMS (-0.72%). By follow-up, 89% of NAV and 87% of NAV + DSMS were successfully connected to resources to address at least one need. Findings suggest that it is feasible to implement a health system-based social care intervention, separately or in combination, with a behavioral intervention to improve diabetes management among a high-risk, socially complex patient population. A larger, pragmatic trial is needed to test the comparative effectiveness of each approach on diabetes-related outcomes.

Integrated Digital Health System Tools to Support Decision Making and Treatment Preparation in CKD: The PREPARE NOW Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Digital health system tools to support shared decision making and preparation for kidney replacement treatments for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are needed. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study of the implementation of digital infrastructure to support a patient-centered health system intervention. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 4 CKD clinics within a large integrated health system. EXPOSURE: We developed an integrated suite of digital engagement tools to support patients' shared decision making and preparation for kidney failure treatments. Tools included an automated CKD patient registry and risk prediction algorithm within the electronic health record (EHR) to identify and prioritize patients in need of nurse case management to facilitate shared decision making and preparation for kidney replacement treatments, an electronic patient-facing values clarification tool, a tracking application to document patients' preparation for treatments, and an EHR work flow to broadcast patients' treatment preferences to all health care providers. OUTCOMES: Uptake and acceptability. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Mixed methods. RESULTS: From July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018, the CKD registry identified 1,032 patients in 4 nephrology clinics, of whom 243 (24%) were identified as high risk for progressing to kidney failure within 2 years. Kidney Transitions Specialists enrolled 117 (48%) high-risk patients by the end of year 1. The values tool was completed by 30/33 (91%) patients who attended kidney modality education. Nurse case managers used the tracking application for 100% of patients to document 287 planning steps for kidney replacement therapy. Most (87%) high-risk patients had their preferred kidney replacement modality documented and displayed in the EHR. Nurse case managers reported that the tools facilitated their identification of patients needing support and their navigation activities. LIMITATIONS: Single institution, short duration. CONCLUSIONS: Digital health system tools facilitated rapid identification of patients needing shared and informed decision making and their preparation for kidney replacement treatments. FUNDING: This work was supported through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Project Program Award (IHS-1409-20967). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02722382.

Intensive meditation for refractory pain and symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess patient interest in intensive meditation training for chronic symptoms. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cross-sectional anonymous survey among six chronic disease clinics in Baltimore including Chronic Kidney Disease, Crohn's Disease, Headache, Renal Transplant Recipients, General Rheumatology, and lupus clinic. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 1119 consecutive patients registering for their appointments at these clinics. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were 6-month pain, global symptomatology, four-item perceived stress scale, use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies, and attitudes toward use of meditation for managing symptoms. We then gave a scripted description of an intensive, 10-day meditation training retreat. Patient interest in attending such a retreat was assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-seven percent (77%) of patients approached completed the survey. Fifty-three percent (53%) of patients reported moderate to severe pain over the past 6 months. Eighty percent (80%) reported use of some CAM therapy in the past. Thirty-five percent (35%) thought that learning meditation would improve their health, and 49% thought it would reduce stress. Overall, 39% reported interest in attending the intensive 10-day meditation retreat. Among those reporting moderate to severe pain or stress, the percentages were higher (48% and 59%). In a univariate analysis, higher education, nonworking/disabled status, female gender, higher stress, higher pain, higher symptomatology, and any CAM use were all associated with a greater odds of being moderately to very interested in an intensive 10-day meditation retreat. A multivariate model that included prior use of CAM therapies as predictors of interest in the program fit the data significantly better than a model not including CAM therapies (p = 0.0013). CONCLUSIONS: Over 50% of patients followed in chronic disease clinics complain of moderate to severe pain. Patients with persistent pain or stress are more likely to be interested in intensive meditation.