Comparison of anti-inflammatory effects of rivaroxaban vs. dabigatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (RIVAL-AF study): multicenter randomized study.

Some experimental studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have anti-inflammatory effects. However, the interval changes in inflammatory markers in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who receive DOACs remain unknown. Between July 2013 and April 2014, a total of 187 AF patients randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n = 91) or dabigatran (n = 96) were assessed for eligibility. The levels of the following inflammatory markers were serially evaluated: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, pentraxin-3, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, growth and differentiation factor-15, and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM). The aim in this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients with AF, in addition to the impact of markers on bleeding events. Finally, 117 patients (rivaroxaban: n = 55, dabigatran: n = 62) were included in the analysis at 12 months. Although the interval changes in sTM levels tended to be greater in the dabigatran group [0.3 (0-0.7) vs. 0.5 (0-1.0) FU/ml, p = 0.061], there were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between 2 groups. There were no significant differences in bleeding events between 2 groups. The interval changes in sTM levels were significantly greater in patients with bleeding compared with those without [0.8 (0.5-1.3) vs. 0.4 (- 0.1-0.8) FU/ml, p = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between rivaroxaban and dabigatran treatments in patients with AF. The increased levels of sTM after DOACs treatment might be related to bleeding events.

Treatment of Churg-Strauss syndrome with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin.

BACKGROUND: In some patients with Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS), especially those with myocardial or neural involvement, conventional treatment with corticosteroids with or without cyclophosphamide is not effective. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of intravenous high-dose immunoglobulin (IVIG) in patients with CSS who showed poor responsiveness to conventional treatment. METHODS: We consecutively selected patients with CSS who showed any organ involvement despite corticosteroid treatment with or without cyclophosphamide. The diagnosis was based on the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. IVIG therapy was performed with a dose of 400 mg/kg of immunoglobulin daily for 5 days. Neuropathy was evaluated with the manual muscle strength test and by the skin temperature of affected sites. Cardiac function was examined with ejection fraction by echocardiography and 2 imaging tests of myocardium (iodine 123 metaiodobenzylguanidine and thallium 201). RESULTS: The manual muscle strength test results were improved, and the skin temperature of both hands and legs was increased by IVIG therapy. In 5 patients with heart failure, the mean +/- SD ejection fraction of the left ventricle increased from 35.2% +/- 13.9% to 61.0% +/- 10.1% (P < .02). The uptake of iodine 123 metaiodobenzylguanidine of the myocardium increased, indicating that the myocardial viability was improved. The thallium 201 images revealed the presence of perfusion defects, which were improved by IVIG therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CSS who are resistant to corticosteroid treatment with or without cyclophosphamide may be treated effectively with IVIG therapy.