First-in-human phase I study of SOR-C13, a TRPV6 calcium channel inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Introduction This was an open-label, dose escalation (3 + 3 design), Phase I study of SOR-C13 in patients with advanced tumors of epithelial origin. Primary objectives were to assess safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics. Secondary goals were to assess pharmacodynamics and efficacy of SOR-C13. Methods SOR-C13 was administered IV QD on days 1-3 and 8-10 of a 21-day cycle. Doses were 2.75 and 5.5 mg/kg (20-min infusion) and 1.375, 2.75, 4.13 and 6.2 mg/kg (90-min infusion). Toxicity was assessed by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed within the first treatment cycle. Tumors were evaluated, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, after two cycles. Results Twenty-three patients were treated. No drug-related serious adverse events occurred. DLTs occurred in six patients: asymptomatic, drug-related, transient Grade 2 hypocalcemia (4 patients), and unrelated Grade 3 anemia and Grade 3 atrial fibrillation, 1 patient each. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation eliminated further Grade 2 hypocalcemia. One Grade 3 treatment emergent adverse event, urticaria, was definitely related to SOR-C13. Four possibly drug-related, Grade 3 events (alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase elevation, headache, and hypokalemia) were observed. Of 22 evaluable patients, 54.5% showed stable disease ranging from 2.8 to 12.5 months. The best response was a 27% reduction in a pancreatic tumor with a 55% reduction in CA19-9 levels at 6.2 mg/kg. Conclusion SOR-C13 was safe and tolerated up to 6.2 mg/kg. The Maximal Tolerated Dose (MTD) was not established. Stable disease suggested antitumor activity.

Pooled safety analysis of BAY 43-9006 (sorafenib) monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours: Is rash associated with treatment outcome?

In this analysis of the safety and efficacy of BAY 43-9006 (sorafenib) -- a novel, oral multi-kinase inhibitor with effects on tumour and its vasculature -- pooled data were obtained from four phase I dose-escalation trials. Time to progression (TTP) was compared in patients with/without grade 2 skin toxicity/diarrhoea. Grade 3 hand-foot skin reactions (HFS; 8%) and diarrhoea (6%) were common. At the recommended 400mg bid dose for phase II/III trials (RDP), 15% of patients experienced grade 2/3 HFS, and 24% experienced grade 2/3 diarrhoea. Sorafenib induced stable disease for 6 months in 12% of patients (6% stabilized for 1 year). Patients receiving sorafenib doses at or close to the RDP, who experienced skin toxicity/diarrhoea, had a significantly increased TTP compared with patients without such toxicity (P < 0.05). Sorafenib was well tolerated at the RDP, and induced sustained disease stabilization, particularly in patients with skin toxicity/diarrhoea.

A phase III randomized trial of BAY 12-9566 (tanomastat) as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer responsive to primary surgery and paclitaxel/platinum containing chemotherapy: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study.

OBJECTIVE: BAY 12-9566 (tanomastat) is a biphenyl matrix metalloprotease inhibitor (MMPI) with antiangiogenic and antimetastatic properties in vivo. The objective of the study was to determine whether the addition of BAY 12-9566 after optimal response to chemotherapy could improve time to progression (TTP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study had received 6-9 cycles of platinum/paclitaxel containing chemotherapy for stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma, with a response of no evidence of disease, or complete or partial response with residual disease < 2 cm. Patients were then randomized to BAY 12-9566 800 mg p.o. b.i.d. or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were quality of life, toxicity, changes in CA 125 levels, response, and overall survival (OS). The total planned sample size was 730. RESULTS: The study was closed after 243 patients had been randomized because of Bayer's decision to close all ongoing trials due to negative results from other phase III trials in pancreatic and small cell lung cancer. The final analysis was performed in August 2000 after the requisite number of events for the first planned interim analysis had occurred; 54% of patients had progressed and 18% had died. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: performance status was ECOG 0/1/2 in 65/33/2%; median age 57 years; 79% of patients were FIGO stage III; 41% were optimally debulked; 76% had serous histology, and 67% had > or = grade 3 histology. Toxicity was generally grade 1 or 2 in severity, with the most common (BAY 12-9566 vs. placebo) being nausea (26% vs. 13%), fatigue (24% vs. 12%), diarrhea (14% vs. 10%), rash (12% vs. 7%), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (3% vs. 1%), and grade 3/4 anemia (5% vs. 1%). Median time to progression (TTP) was 10.4 months (8.5-11.5) for BAY 12-9566 and 9.2 months (7.2-13.9) for placebo (P = 0.67). Median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months (12.9-infinity) for BAY 12-9566 and 11.9 months (10.5-16.5) for placebo (P = 0.53). CONCLUSION: We conclude that BAY 12-9566 was generally well tolerated and at the time of the final analysis, there was no evidence of an impact of BAY 12-9566 on PFS or OS.

An NCIC-CTG phase I dose escalation pharmacokinetic study of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with doxorubicin.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study was performed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the oral matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose of these agents in combination and the dose for use in subsequent studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 14 patients were entered onto 3 dose levels consisting of escalating doses of doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2), 60 mg/m(2) and 70 mg/m(2)) with 800 mg po bid BAY 12-9566. At all three dose levels, patients received doxorubicin alone in cycle one on day 1. Daily oral dosing with BAY 12-9566 was started on day 8 of cycle 1, and thus doxorubicin was given concurrently with BAY 12-9566 in cycle 2. Patients were continued on treatment until a dose limiting toxicity or tumour progression occurred. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic studies from cycles 1 and 2 from the patients treated in the first three dose levels demonstrated that the addition of BAY 12-9566 increased the AUC(0-12h) levels of doxorubicin by a median of 48%. No effects were seen on the BAY 12-9566 pharmacokinetic values. Two dose limiting toxicities were seen at the third dose level. One patient experienced grade 3 stomatitis in cycle 2, and another patient experienced grade 4 granulocytopenia in cycle 1 and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in cycle 2. Thus the maximum tolerated dose of 60 mg/m(2) was declared. These toxicities were those that would have been expected from doxorubicin alone. CONCLUSIONS: BAY 12-9566 can be safely administered with full doses of doxorubicin without evidence of clinical interaction. The recommended dose of doxorubicin to be combined with BAY 12-9566 800 mg po b.i.d is 60 mg/m(2), however, further development of BAY 12-9566 has been abandoned.

Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel Raf kinase and VEGFR inhibitor BAY 43-9006, administered for 28 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: BAY 43--9006, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, targets serine-threonine kinases and receptor tyrosine kinases, and affects the tumor and vasculature in preclinical models. Based on its pharmacologic effect, it may be a useful cancer treatment. This study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BAY 43-9006 in 42 patients with advanced, refractory metastatic or recurrent solid tumors. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, pharmacokinetics and tumor response were also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, phase I, dose-escalation study, BAY 43--9,006 was administered orally in repeated cycles of 35 days (28 days on/7 days off). Eight doses were investigated: from 50 mg every fourth day to 600 mg twice daily. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, tumor progression or death. RESULTS: The MTD was 400 mg twice daily. BAY 43-9006 was well tolerated, with mild to moderate toxicities; only six patients discontinued study therapy due to adverse events. DLTs consisted of hand-foot skin reaction in three of seven patients receiving 600 mg twice daily. Stable disease was achieved in 22% of patients; median duration of stable disease was 7.2 months. Consistent with its observed half-life of approximately 27 h, BAY 43-9, 006 accumulated on multiple dosing. Increases in exposure were less than proportional to the increases in dose. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that further clinical investigation of BAY 43--9006 is warranted, and suggest it could be a promising future therapy for patients with cancer.

Quantification of matrix metalloproteinase activity in plasma of patients enrolled in a BAY 12-9566 phase I study.

The expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is often associated with invasiveness or grade of tumours. Increased blood levels of MMP proteins, including MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3 and MMP-9 have been detected in various types of cancers. With the exception of one study, MMPs in serum and plasma have been determined using ELISA. In the present study we measured the activity of the MMPs found in human plasma samples using gelatin enzymography and fluorimetric degradation assays. We used plasma samples from healthy control subjects and cancer patients enrolled in a dose-finding study for the MMP inhibitor, BAY 12-9566, to assess the activity of MMPs found in plasma and screen for efficacy of the MMP inhibitor. BAY 12-9566 has inhibitory activity toward MMP-2, MMP-3 and MMP-9. Patients with advanced solid tumours were enrolled in our study and plasma was collected on day 1 before dosing and at steady-state of the drug on day 15. Our results show that BAY 12-9566 was effective in lowering the plasma gelatinolytic activity in the group of 29 patients when considering the data obtained from a fluorimetric gelatinase assay. The data obtained from gelatin enzymography, however, did not reach significance. The fluorimetric degradation assay could be a useful tool to screen plasma from cancer patients in other clinical trials assessing MMP inhibitors.