Geriatric nutritional risk index as a prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a simple and well-established nutritional assessment tool that is a significant prognostic factor for various cancers. However, the role of the GNRI in predicting clinical outcomes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients has not been investigated. To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed a total of 476 patients with newly diagnosed de novo DLBCL. We defined the best cutoff value of the GNRI as 96.8 using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Patients with a GNRI < 96.8 had significantly lower overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those with a GNRI ≥ 96.8 (5-year OS, 61.2 vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001; 5-year PFS, 53.7 vs. 75.8%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that performance status, Ann Arbor stage, serum lactate dehydrogenase, and GNRI were independent prognostic factors for OS. Among patients with high-intermediate and high-risk by National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI), the 5-year OS was significantly lower in patients with a GNRI < 96.8 than in those with a GNRI ≥ 96.8 (high-intermediate risk, 59.5 vs. 75.2%, P = 0.006; high risk, 37.4 vs. 64.9%, P = 0.033). In the present study, we demonstrated that the GNRI was an independent prognostic factor in DLBCL patients. The GNRI could identify a population of poor-risk patients among those with high-intermediate and high-risk by NCCN-IPI.

Analysis of prognostic value of complete response by PET-CT and further stratification by clinical and biological markers in DLBCL patients.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is performed as the standard method for response assessment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, a substantial proportion of patients experience relapse even if they have achieved complete response (CR) defined by PET-CT. We validated the prognostic value of CR by PET-CT and applied the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) and cell of origin (COO) to patients with CR by PET-CT to evaluate their additional predictive ability for survival outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed DLBCL patients who were treated with R-CHOP or an R-CHOP-like regimen and who achieved CR by PET-CT or CT only. A total of 185 patients were analyzed: 114 patients achieved CR by PET-CT and 71 patients by CT only. Patients with CR by PET-CT had significantly better overall survival (OS) than those with CR by CT (5-year OS, 87.5 vs. 62.4%, P = 0.003). Patients with high risk according to the NCCN-IPI had a dismal outcome despite achieving CR by PET-CT (5-year OS, 61.8%). In contrast, low-, low-intermediate-, and high-intermediate-risk patients had excellent outcomes (5-year OS, 100, 89.7, and 93.5%, respectively). Among patients with CR by PET-CT, patients with germinal center B cell (GCB) DLBCL (n = 40) had significantly better survival than those with non-GCB DLBCL (n = 57) (5-year OS, 96.9 vs. 75.5%, P = 0.039). We demonstrated that CR by PET-CT was a better predictor of survival outcomes than CR by CT only. The NCCN-IPI and COO subtypes could identify a subpopulation of poor-risk patients among those who achieved CR by PET-CT.

Beta-2 microglobulin as a significant prognostic factor and a new risk model for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Previous reports have evaluated the prognostic value of serum beta-2 microglobulin (B2MG) level in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, its role in predicting clinical outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the rituximab era has not been extensively investigated. Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of B2MG and proposed a new prognostic model including B2MG for patients with DLBCL. A total of 274 patients with newly diagnosed de novo DLBCL were retrospectively analyzed. We defined the best cutoff value as 3.2 mg/L by using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Patients with a B2MG level ≥3.2 mg/L had significantly lower overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival than those with a B2MG level <3.2 mg/L (3-year OS, 50.9% vs. 89.4%, p < 0.001; 3-year progression-free survival, 45.3% vs. 79.7%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that B2MG, age, performance status, and Ann Arbor stage were independent prognostic factors for OS. We developed a new prognostic model consisting of these four significant factors. We stratified patients into four-risk groups: low (L, 0 factor), low-intermediate (LI, 1-2 factors), high-intermediate (HI, 3 factors), high (H, 4 factors). This new prognostic model showed better risk discrimination compared with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (5-year OS: 100% and 23.4% vs. 100% and 27.1%, in L and H risk groups, respectively). Our study suggested that B2MG level is a significant prognostic factor in patients with DLBCL. A new prognostic index composed of age, performance status, stage, and B2MG could stratify the outcomes of patients with DLBCL effectively and appears to be a valuable risk model for these patients. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.