Comparison of the performance and safety of 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical performance and safety of 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs)-Twinvisc (OVD 1) and Duovisc (OVD 2)-in cataract surgery. SETTING: European multicenter study. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled study. METHODS: Patients with cataract had phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in 1 eye. They were randomly assigned to receive OVD 1 or OVD 2. Preoperative and postoperative examinations over 3 months included mean intraocular pressure (IOP), incidence of IOP peaks (≥30 mm Hg and ≥24 mm Hg), endothelial cell count (ECC), corneal thickness, and intraocular inflammation. A subjective evaluation of the OVDs was performed. RESULTS: The study comprised 220 patients. The incidence of IOP peaks and the mean IOP were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups at any of the follow-up visits. At 6 hours, the incidence of IOP spikes 30 mm Hg or higher was 6.5% and 7.2% in the OVD 1 and the OVD 2 groups, respectively (P = .846). For the IOP spikes 24 mm Hg or higher, the incidence was 16.8% and 25.2%, respectively (P = .128). Three months postoperatively there was no statistically significant difference in ECC and pachymetry between the 2 groups. Mild inflammation was noticed up to 7 days postoperatively after which it resolved in both groups. Subjectively, the OVD 2 was easier to use, whereas the OVD 1 had better cohesive and dispersive properties. CONCLUSIONS: Both OVDs have similar performance and safety profiles in phacoemulsification cataract surgery. No clinically relevant differences were found between the 2 devices regarding transient IOP spikes, mean IOP, corneal endothelium injury, or inflammation.

Evaluation of preoperative and postoperative prophylactic regimens for prevention and treatment of diffuse lamellar keratitis.

PURPOSE: To investigate preoperative and postoperative prophylactic treatment with different pharmacological agents before flap cutting and exposure to a diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) causative agent. SETTING: Magill Research Center for Vision Correction, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: The study comprised 48 eyes of 24 Dutch-belted rabbits. Three days before a corneal flap was cut and the corneal interface was exposed to Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide endotoxin, a DLK causative agent, the eyes were randomly assigned to treatment with a mast-cell stabilizer, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), or a corticosteroid or left without treatment as controls. The treatment was maintained throughout the 1-week follow-up. Slitlamp examinations and photographs were performed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days; DLK was graded by a masked observer from 0 (no DLK) to IV. Corneal interface scrapings were performed in selected eyes on day 7. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, 36 eyes were available for evaluation. At 1 week, 100% of the control eyes and the eyes treated with the mast-cell stabilizer developed DLK; in the NSAID-treated and corticosteroid-treated eyes, the DLK rate was 86% and 70%, respectively. At 1 day, the severity of DLK was significantly lower in eyes treated with the mast-cell stabilizer (0.44) and at 7 days, it was significantly lower in corticosteroid-treated eyes (0.3) than in the control group (1.5 and 1.4, respectively) (P<.05, Wilcoxon test). Corneal interface scraping from an eye with grade III DLK showed numerous inflammatory cells. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative and postoperative treatment with corticosteroids significantly reduced the severity of DLK compared to the untreated control eyes in this animal model. Treatment with a mast-cell stabilizer and an NSAID had less effect on the postoperative course of DLK.