Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pain ; 11(2): 179-85, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19945353

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Patients with chronic pain often present with hyperalgesia, possibly due to hyperexcitability of nociceptive pathways. The aim of the present study was to investigate alterations in flexor withdrawal reflex (FWR) excitability in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and the potential effect of specific physical inputs or therapeutic interventions (ie, joint compression and mobilization) on these behaviors. Ten subjects with and 10 without knee OA (age 45-75) were recruited. The FWR was examined utilizing suprathreshold, noxious electrocutaneous stimuli applied at the medial foot. Surface electromyographic (EMG) was recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) and biceps femoris (BF), and peak joint torques recorded at the hip, knee, and ankle. FWR threshold was ascertained and responses at 2x threshold recorded after the following conditions: a maximal, volitional, joint-compression task, a sham hands-on intervention, and a Grade III oscillatory joint-mobilization intervention. A decreased threshold-to-flexor withdrawal response was found in the OA vs control group (P < .01). EMG and joint-torque FWR responses were further augmented in the OA group following the maximal joint-compression task (P < .05), yet remained unchanged or diminished in controls. Joint mobilization, but not sham intervention, reduced reflex responses significantly, although primarily by decreasing BF activity and knee torques (P < .05). PERSPECTIVE: Application of specific physical inputs to individuals with knee OA similar to those encountered during activity of daily living or during therapeutic interventions appear to modulate involuntary, nociceptive reflex responses. Routine weight-bearing activities such as walking may potentially enhance heightened FWR responses, while joint mobilization, a commonly used clinical intervention, may diminish reflex excitability.


Assuntos
Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/reabilitação , Reflexo/fisiologia , Idoso , Tornozelo/inervação , Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Eletromiografia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Articulações/inervação , Articulações/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Contração Muscular/fisiologia , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor/métodos
2.
Phys Ther ; 86(11): 1466-78, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17079746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Robotic devices that provide passive guidance and stabilization of the legs and trunk during treadmill stepping may increase the delivery of locomotor training to subjects with neurological injury. Lower-extremity guidance also may reduce voluntary muscle activity as compared with compliant assistance provided by therapists. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in metabolic costs and lower-limb muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking. SUBJECTS: Twelve ambulatory subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury participated. METHODS: In 2 separate protocols, metabolic and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected during standing and stepping on a treadmill with therapist and robotic assistance. During robotic-assisted walking, subjects were asked to match the kinematic trajectories of the device and maximize their effort. During therapist-assisted walking, subjects walked on the treadmill with manual assistance provided as necessary. RESULTS: Metabolic costs and swing-phase hip flexor EMG activity were significantly lower when subjects were asked to match the robotic device trajectories than with therapist-assisted walking. These differences were reduced when subjects were asked to maximize their effort during robotic-assisted stepping, although swing-phase plantar-flexor EMG activity was increased. In addition, during standing prior to therapist- or robotic-assisted stepping, metabolic costs were higher without stabilization from the robotic device. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Differences in metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns between therapist- and robotic-assisted standing and stepping illustrate the importance of minimizing passive guidance and stabilization provided during step training protocols.


Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício , Robótica , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Caminhada/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Biorretroalimentação Psicológica , Protocolos Clínicos , Eletromiografia , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Marcha , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Aparelhos Ortopédicos , Robótica/métodos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/classificação , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/metabolismo , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA