The precedence effect for lateralization at low sensation levels.

Using dichotic signals presented by headphone, stimulus onset dominance (the precedence effect) for lateralization at low sensation levels was investigated for five normal hearing subjects. Stimuli were based on 2400-Hz low pass filtered 5-ms noise bursts. We used the paradigm, as described by Aoki and Houtgast (Hear. Res., 59 (1992) 25-30) and Houtgast and Aoki (Hear. Res., 72 (1994) 29-36), in which the stimulus is divided into a leading and a lagging part with opposite lateralization cues (i.e. an interaural time delay of 0.2 ms). The occurrence of onset dominance was investigated by measuring lateral perception of the stimulus, with fixed equal duration of leading and lagging part, while decreasing absolute signal level or adding a filtered white noise with the signal level set at 65 dBA. The dominance of the leading part was quantified by measuring the perceived lateral position of the stimulus as a function of the relative duration of the leading (and thus the lagging) part. This was done at about 45 dB SL without masking noise and also at a signal-to-noise ratio resulting in a sensation level of 10 dB. The occurrence and strength of the precedence effect was found to depend on sensation level, which was decreased either by lowering the signal level or by adding noise. With the present paradigm, besides a decreased lateralization accuracy, a decrease in the precedence effect was found for sensation levels below about 30-40 dB. In daily-life conditions, with a sensation level in noise of typically 10 dB, the onset dominance was still manifest, albeit degraded to some extent.

A precedence effect in the perception of inter-aural cross correlation.

Does the precedence effect, well known in the field of sound localization or lateralization, also apply to other percepts based on binaural processing? We have compared, with one and the same experimental paradigm, a manifestation of the traditional precedence effect in lateralization with a possible similar effect in the perception of diffuseness or compactness of a sound image. With dichotic headphone stimulation, lateralization was controlled by the inter-aural time delay (IATD), and diffuseness/compactness by the inter-aural cross correlation (IACC). The experimental paradigm rests on the principle of estimating the over-all sensation of a 20-ms noise burst, which was subdivided in two parts, with the relevant dichotic information (IATD or IACC) in the leading part being opposite to that in the trailing part. When each part is 10 ms, it is found that the overall sensation is slightly dominated by the information in the leading part, both for lateralization and for compactness/diffuseness. This dominance of the leading part can be compensated by a certain decrease of its duration and/or amplitude relative to that of the trailing part. It is found that this quantitative measure for the 'strength' of the precedence effect for the present stimulus is essentially the same for IATD and IACC, suggesting that the precedence effect does not apply exclusively to sound localization or lateralization, but to at least one other percept based on binaural processing as well, namely the processing of inter-aural cross correlation.

Growth of pulsation threshold of a suppressed tone as a function of its level.

The pulsation threshold (PT) was measured at the frequency of a probe tone in a two-tone stimulus. A suppressor tone was higher in frequency than the probe tone and was fixed in level. As the level of the probe tone was increased, three regions of performance were observed: (1) for probe tone levels below simultaneous masked threshold (SMT), PT was the same as that measured for the suppressor alone, (2) for levels above SMT, PT increased linearly with level, indicating a constant amount of suppression in dB, and (3) for higher levels a recruitment-like phenomenon was observed, in which the PT increased faster than the probe level. The maximum amount of suppression observed was equal to the difference between the PT and SMT for the suppressor alone. One interpretation is that the suppressor reduces excitation on the slopes of its own excitation pattern by the same amount that it reduces the additional excitation from a probe tone. These results are consistent with physiological data, where the amount of suppression is determined by the suppressor and is independent of the level of the probe tone.