RESUMO
Three-phase crystallization (TPC) was introduced in this study to purify L-menthol from menthol enantiomer mixtures in consideration of the formation of solid solutions. TPC is a new separation technology, which combines melt crystallization and vaporization to result in the desired crystalline product from a liquid mixture along with the unwanted components vaporized via the three-phase transformation by reducing temperature and pressure. The three-phase transformation conditions for the liquid menthol enantiomer mixtures were determined based on the thermodynamic calculations to direct the TPC experiments. A new model was proposed based on the mass and energy balances in consideration of the formation of the solid solutions to predict the yield and purity of the final L-menthol product during TPC. The yield and purity obtained from the TPC experiments were compared with those predicted by the model.
Assuntos
Anestésicos , Mentol , Cristalização , Mentol/química , Terpenos , Temperatura , Termodinâmica , Extratos VegetaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the sandwich method with GreenLight photoselective vaporization (GLPVP) and bipolar transurethral resection (B-TURP) with those of the enucleation method in patients with BPH and a prostate volume ≥ 80 g. METHODS: Patients with BPH who underwent either the sandwich method with GLPVP and B-TURP or the enucleation method between 2014 and 2021 were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the comparison of uroflowmetry results between the 2 groups. Safety analysis of the complication rates was also compared. RESULTS: The cohort included 55 patients in the sandwich group and 41 patients in the enucleation group. In the efficacy analysis, both groups showed comparable uroflowmetry results, except for a higher postoperative average flow rate in the enucleation group. Regarding perioperative parameters, the sandwich method required a longer operating time, and the enucleation group had a higher incidence of manual Foley irrigation. Both groups demonstrated similar postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The sandwich method exhibited comparable efficacy and safety to the enucleation method in patients with BPH with a prostate volume ≥ 80 g. Thus, for surgeons who are familiar with GLPVP and B-TURP, the sandwich method may be an alternative surgical approach for BPH patients with large prostates.
Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Próstata/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia a Laser/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Transurethral procedures, including transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and laser prostatectomy, are often linked to emergency room (ER) visits for postoperative bleeding. Although some studies have been conducted, the risk factors associated with these ER visits are not completely understood. This retrospective cohort study identified potential risk factors associated with ER visits for postoperative bleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative assessment data and operational and postoperational parameters recorded at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan between December 2015 and January 2017 for patients who underwent elective transurethral procedures were analyzed to identify potential risk factors. The primary endpoint was ER visits for gross hematuria within three months following operation, and the secondary endpoint was ER visits for blood clot-induced urinary retention (clot retention) within three months following operation. RESULTS: A total of 665 patients who underwent elective transurethral procedures were enrolled. The transurethral procedures included monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP), bipolar TURP (B-TURP), greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) and thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVARP). Regarding ER visits for clot retention within three months, multivariable logistic regression revealed significantly lower rates of clot retention in patients who received B-TURP than in those who underwent ThuVARP (AOR, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.82, p = 0.027). Moreover, significantly higher clot retention was observed in patients who underwent two or more rounds of manual irrigation (AOR, 9.51; 95% CI, 1.66-54.43, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Multiple manual irrigations shortly after operation can be considered a novel predictor of postoperative clot retention-related ER visits. Among the transurethral procedures, ThuVARP was associated with a higher risk of clot retention-related ER visits than was B-TURP.
Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Bladder pain syndrome (BPS)/interstitial cystitis (IC) is a chronic symptom complex that may cause bothersome storage symptoms and pain or discomfort of the bladder, adversely affecting a patient's quality of life. The etiology of IC/BPS remains unclear, and its cause may be multifactorial. Diagnosis of IC/BPS is based on clinical features, and the possibility of other conditions must be ruled out first. Although no definitive treatment is currently available for IC/BPS, various intravesical therapies are used for IC/BPS, including heparin, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate, pentosan polysulfate, dimethylsulfoxide, liposomes, and botulinum onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A). This review summarizes the intravesical therapy for IC/BPS and discusses recent advances in the instillation of liposomal-mediated BoNT-A and other newly developed intravesical therapies.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Liberação da Acetilcolina/administração & dosagem , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administração & dosagem , Cistite Intersticial/tratamento farmacológico , Agentes Urológicos/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravesical , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Sulfatos de Condroitina/administração & dosagem , Cistite Intersticial/epidemiologia , Dimetil Sulfóxido/administração & dosagem , Sequestradores de Radicais Livres/administração & dosagem , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lipossomos , Poliéster Sulfúrico de Pentosana/administração & dosagemRESUMO
To determine which surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms, which is suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), is more cost-effective and yields a better patient's preference. Treatment outcome, cost, and perioperative complications to assess the treatment effectiveness of using laser prostatectomy as a treatment for BPH were investigated in this study.This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent transurethral resection of prostate (TUR-P) and another 100 patients who received high-powered 120âW (GreenLight HPS) laser prostatectomy between 2005 and 2011.International Prostate Symptom Score and uroflow parameters were collected before the surgery and the uroflow and postvoiding residual volumes were evaluated before treatment and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. The results of 100 treatments after HPS laser prostatectomy were compared with the results of 100 patients who received TUR-P from the same surgeon. Complication rates and admission costs were analyzed.From 2005 to 2011, 200 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic surgery. Study participants were men with BPH with mean age of 71.3 years old. The peak flow rate went from 8.47 to 15.83âmL/s for 3 months after laser prostatectomy. Laser therapy groups showed better improvement in symptom score, shortened length of stay, and quality of life score when compared with those of TUR-P procedures. The estimated cost for laser prostatectomy was high when compared with cost of any other TUR-P procedural option at Chang Gung Hospital (Pâ=â0.001). All admission charges were similar except for the cost of the laser equipment and accessories (mainly the laser fiber) (Pâ=â0.001). Due to this cost of equipment, it increased the total admission charges for the laser group and therefore made the cost for the laser group higher than that of the TUR-P group.Perioperative complications, such as the need for checking for bleeding, urinary retention rate or urosepsis rate within 30 days after the surgery, held no significant differences between both groups.Compared with alternative treatment options, laser prostatectomy of the prostate is clinically effective but yields a high cost of treatment for symptomatic BPH.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Prostatectomia/economia , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hiperplasia Prostática/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: We used the Short Form (SF)-36® Health Survey scale to assess the effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFE) on aging males who received transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). METHODS: From April 2010 to December 2010, a total of 66 patients who underwent TUR-P were enrolled in this study. They were randomized into two groups (with 33 patients in each group) - an experimental group who performed postoperative PFE every day and a control group. Data, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry study, and the SF-36 quality of life measure, were collected before the operation, and at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the operation. We analyzed the differences between the two groups with respect to their IPSS scores, maximal urinary flow rate, residual urine amount, and life quality. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (experimental group: 32 patients, and control group: 29 patients) completed this study. We found that at 12 weeks postop, patients who performed PFE every day had a better maximal urinary flow rate (16.41 ± 6.20 vs 12.41 ± 7.28 mL/min) (P = 0.026) compared with patients in the control group. The experimental group had a much greater decrease in IPSS score (P < 0.001). As for the SF-36 scale, the experimental group had higher scores than did the control group on both the physiological domain (54.86 vs 49.86) (P = 0.029) and the psychological domain (61.88 vs 52.69) (P = 0.005). However, there were no significant differences with respect to the postvoiding residual urine between the two groups (57.24 ± 52.95 vs 64.68 ± 50.63 mL) (P = 0.618). CONCLUSION: Compared with the control group, patients who performed PFE for 12 weeks after TUR-P showed improvement in their maximal urinary flow rate and lower urinary tract symptoms, and had a better quality of life. The immediate initiation of PFE is suggested for patients who undergo TUR-P.