Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Med ; 8(6): 2759-2768, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30983159

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate dosimetric factors for predicting acute lymphopenia and the survival of glioma patients with postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: A total of 148 glioma patients were reviewed. Acute lymphopenia was defined as a peripheral lymphocyte count (PLC) lower than 1.0 × 109 /L during radiotherapy with a normal level at pretreatment. PLCs with the corresponding dates and dose volume histogram parameters were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were constructed to assess the significance of risk factors associated with lymphopenia and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Sixty-nine (46.6%) patients developed lymphopenia during radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses revealed that the risk increased with the maximal dose of the hypothalamus (HT Dmax) ≥56 Gy (58.9% vs 28.5%, P = 0.002), minimal dose of the whole brain (WB Dmin) ≥2 Gy (54.3% vs 33.9%, P = 0.006), or mean dose of the WB (WB Dmean) ≥34 Gy (56.0% vs 37.0%, P = 0.022). Patients with older age, high-grade glioma, development of lymphopenia, high HT Dmax, WB Dmin, and WB Dmean had significantly inferior OS in the multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: HT Dmax, WB Dmin, and WB Dmean are promising indicators of lymphopenia and the survival of glioma patients undergoing postoperative IMRT. The necessity and feasibility of dosimetric constraints for HT and WB is warranted with further investigation.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/efeitos da radiação , Glioma/complicações , Glioma/mortalidade , Hipotálamo/efeitos da radiação , Linfopenia/etiologia , Linfopenia/mortalidade , Radiometria , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicações , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Feminino , Glioma/diagnóstico , Glioma/terapia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 75: 150-158, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28235726

RESUMO

AIM OF THE STUDY: Previous results from our trial showed that adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy did not significantly improve survival after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) at 2 years. Here, we present the data of long-term survival and late toxicities to further assess the ultimate therapeutic index of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). METHODS: Patients with stage III-IVB (except T3-4N0) NPC were randomly assigned to receive CCRT plus AC or CCRT only at seven institutions in China. Patients in both groups received cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly up to 7 weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The CCRT plus AC group subsequently received adjuvant cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/d for 120 h every 4 weeks for three cycles. The primary end-point was failure-free survival. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-one patients were randomised to the CCRT plus AC group and 257 to the CCRT only group. After a median follow-up of 68.4 months, estimated 5-year failure-free survival rate was 75% in the CCRT plus AC group and 71% in the CCRT only group (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.64-1.22; p = 0.45). 66 (27%) of 249 patients in the CCRT plus AC group and 53 (21%) of 254 patients in the CCRT only group developed one or more late grade 3-4 toxicities (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy still failed to demonstrate significant survival benefit after CCRT in locoregionally advanced NPC based on the long-term follow-up data, and addition of adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil did not significantly increase late toxicities. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00677118.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , China/epidemiologia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Radiat Oncol ; 10: 70, 2015 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25889937

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To investigate the incidence and risk of severe late toxicity with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Eligible studies included prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CCRT versus radiotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and in which data on severe late toxicities were available. Random effects or fixed effect models were applied to obtain the summary incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Five RCTs with 1102 patients with NPC were included in this analysis. The summary incidence of overall severe late toxicities in patients receiving CCRT was 30.7% (95% CI, 18-47.2%) and the incidence of radiotherapy alone group was 21.7% (95% CI, 13.3-33.4%). The use of concurrent chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of severe late toxicities, with a RR of 1.349 (95% CI, 1.108-1.643; P = 0.005). As for specific late toxicity, CCRT significantly increased the risk of ear deafness/otitis (RR = 1.567; 95% CI, 1.192-2.052), but other late toxicities were not significantly different. Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy regimens with 3-week high-dose cisplatin (HC) have a higher risk of ear deafness/otitis (RR = 1.672; 95% CI, 1.174-2.382; P = 0.026). However, there was no significant increase in the RR of severe ear complication with the addition of non-3-week high-dose cisplatin (nonHC) regimens (RR = 1.433; 95% CI, 0.946-2.171; P = 0.095). CONCLUSION: With the present evidence, the addition of concurrent chemotherapy seems to increase the risk of severe late toxicities in patients with NPC, especially when using HC regimen for the occurrence of severe ototoxicity.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/radioterapia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Intervalos de Confiança , Doenças dos Nervos Cranianos/etiologia , Surdez/induzido quimicamente , Surdez/etiologia , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organoplatínicos/efeitos adversos , Otite/induzido quimicamente , Otite/etiologia , Oxaliplatina , Estudos Prospectivos , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Risco , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/etiologia
4.
Lancet Oncol ; 13(2): 163-71, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22154591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effect of the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is unclear. We aimed to assess the contribution of adjuvant chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. METHODS: We did an open-label phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial at seven institutions in China. Randomisation was by a computer-generated random number code. Patients were stratified by treatment centre and randomly assigned in blocks of four. Treatment allocation was not masked. We randomly assigned patients with non-metastatic stage III or IV (except T3-4N0) nasopharyngeal carcinoma to receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients in both groups received 40 mg/m(2) cisplatin weekly up to 7 weeks, concurrently with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was given as 2·0-2·27 Gy per fraction with five daily fractions per week for 6-7 weeks to a total dose of 66 Gy or greater to the primary tumour and 60-66 Gy to the involved neck area. The concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy group subsequently received 80 mg/m(2) adjuvant cisplatin and 800 mg/m(2) per day fluorouracil for 120 h every 4 weeks for three cycles. Our primary endpoint was failure-free survival. We did efficacy analyses in our intention-to-treat population. Our trial is ongoing; in this report we present the 2 year survival results and acute toxic effects. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00677118. FINDINGS: 251 patients were assigned to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy group and 257 to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone group. After a median follow-up of 37·8 months (range 1·3-61·0), the estimated 2 year failure-free survival rate was 86% (95% CI 81-90) in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy group and 84% (78-88) in concurrent chemoradiotherapy only group (hazard ratio 0·74, 95% CI 0·49-1·10; p=0·13). Stomatitis was the most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 adverse event during both radiotherapy (76 of 249 patients in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy group and 82 of 254 in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone group) and adjuvant chemotherapy (43 [21%] of 205 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy). INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy did not significantly improve failure-free survival after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to fully assess survival and late toxic effects, but such regimens should not, at present, be used outside well-designed clinical trials. FUNDING: Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Programme (No 2007037), Science Foundation of Key Hospital Clinical Programme of Ministry of Health PR China (No 2010-178), and Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2010).


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma , China , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Adulto Jovem
5.
Chin J Cancer ; 29(5): 551-5, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20426907

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CCRT has not been determined. Therefore, we conducted 2 phase II studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5 fluorouracil (5-Fu) (TPF) followed by radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin in patients with stage III and IV(A - B) NPC. This article is the preliminary report on treatment related toxicities and response. METHODS: Graded according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging criteria, only patients with stage III or IV(A-B) poorly differentiated or undifferentiated NPC (World Health Organization type II/III) were included. We planned to recruit 52 patients with stage III disease and 64 patients with stage IV(A - B) disease. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TPF (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1; cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), day 1; 5 Fu 500 mg/(m2 x day), continuous intravenous infusion for 120 h), every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, followed by weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) concurrent with radiotherapy. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were used. Gross disease planning target volume (PTV), high risk and low risk subclinical PTV doses were prescribed at 70-76 Gy, 66-70 Gy, and 60-61.25 Gy at 1.75-2.0 Gy per fraction. The lower neck or supraclavicular fields may be treated with conventional AP/PA fields for a total of 54 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction. Patients were evaluated for tumor response after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and at 3 months after radiation according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). The latest version of the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE 3.0) was used for grading all adverse events. RESULTS: Fifty nine patients were evaluable for treatment response. Thirty patients had stage III disease and 29 patients had stage IV(A-B). All patients completed RT to the prescribed dose and 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 51 patients (86.4%) completing 3 cycles. A total of 50 (84.7%) and 39 patients (66.1%) completed 4 weeks and 5 weeks of cisplatin during CCRT, respectively. The overall response rate in the primary site and the neck region were 94.9% [complete response (CR) in 25.4%] and 100% (CR in 19.6%) after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At 3 months after RT, the CR rates increased to 96.6% and 90.2%, respectively. After a median follow up of 14.3 months, we observed 5 treatment failures and 2 deaths. The 1 year overall survival, distant metastasis free survival, and locoregional relapse free survival rates were 100%, 95.7%, and 97.7%, respectively. The rates of grade 3/4 myelosuppression and anorexia/nausea/vomiting during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 55.9% and 16.9%, respectively. The corresponding rates were 11.9% and 23.7% during CCRT. Grade 3/4 mucositis, skin desquamation, and xerostomia occurred in 6.8%, 44.1%, and 27.1% of patients, respectively. There were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TPF followed by CCRT was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. Preliminary results are encouraging and warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Adulto , Idoso , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Anemia/etiologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Humanos , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Leucopenia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/etiologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/etiologia , Radioterapia Conformacional , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Indução de Remissão , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA