Quercetin suppresses ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rat mandibles by regulating autophagy and the NLRP3 pathway.

With the aging population and the popularity of implant prostheses, an increasing number of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) patients require implant restorations; however, poor bone condition affects the long-term stability of implant prostheses. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of quercetin (QR) compared with alendronate (ALN), the primary treatment for PMOP, on mandibular osteoporosis (OP) induced by ovariectomy (OVX) in female rats. Adult female rats were treated with QR (50 mg/kg/day), ALN (6.25 mg/kg/week) by gavage for 8 weeks, chloroquine (CQ, 10 mg/kg/twice a week), and cytokine release inhibitory drug 3 (MCC950, 10 mg/kg/three times a week) by intraperitoneal injection for 8 weeks after bilateral OVX. Blood samples were collected prior to euthanasia; the mandibles were harvested and subjected to micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and pathological analysis. QR administration controlled weight gain and significantly improved the bone microstructure in OVX rats, increasing bone mass, and bone mineral density (BMD), reducing bone trabecular spacing, and decreasing osteoclast numbers. Western blotting, real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and serum markers confirmed that QR inhibited interleukin- 1ß (IL-1ß) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) on the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor (NLR) protein 3 (NLRP3) pathway thereby inhibiting osteoclast differentiation, immunofluorescence and western blotting also confirmed that QR inhibited autophagy in OVX rats and suppressed the number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-stained positive osteoclasts. The findings suggest that QR may protect the bone structure and prevent bone loss in osteoporotic rats by inhibiting the NLRP3 pathway and autophagy in osteoclasts with comparable effects to ALN, thus QR may have the potential to be a promising alternative supplement for the preventive and therapeutic treatment of PMOP.

Comparison of safety and outcomes related to remdesivir treatment among dialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are highly susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and its complications. Remdesivir has improved outcomes in COVID-19 patients but its use has been limited among ESKD patients due to insufficient data regarding safety outcomes. We sought to evaluate the safety of remdesivir among dialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients age ≥18 years on maintenance dialysis and hospitalized with COVID-19 between 1 May 2020 and 31 January 2021 within an integrated health system who were treated or not treated with remdesivir. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and transaminitis (AST/ALT >5× normal). Pseudo-populations were created using inverse probability of treatment weights with propensity scoring to balance patient characteristics among the two groups. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error was performed to estimate 30-day mortality risk ratio. Results: A total of 486 (407 hemodialysis and 79 peritoneal dialysis) patients were hospitalized with COVID-19, among which 112 patients (23%) were treated with remdesivir [median treatment four days (interquartile range 2-5)]. The 30-day mortality rate was 24.1% among remdesivir-treated and 27.8% among non-treated patients. The estimated 30-day mortality rate was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52-1.05) among remdesivir treated compared with non-treated patients. Liver injury and ICU admission rates were 1.8% and 14.3% among remdesivir-treated patients compared with 2.4% and 16% among non-treated patients. Conclusion: Among dialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with higher rates of liver injury or ICU admissions, and demonstrated a trend toward lower 30-day mortality.

Real-world use patterns of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril/valsartan) among patients with heart failure within a large integrated health system.

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) that is now preferred in guidelines over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, it has not been broadly adopted in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To characterize ARNI use within a large diverse real-world population and assess for any racial disparities. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study within Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Adult patients with HFrEF who received ARNIs, ACEIs, or ARBs between January 1, 2014, and November 30, 2020, were identified. The prevalence of ARNI use among the cohort and patient characteristics by ARNIs vs ACEIs/ARBs use were described. Multivariable regression was performed to estimate odds ratios and 95% CIs of receiving ARNI by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 12,250 patients with HFrEF receiving ACEIs, ARBs, or ARNIs, 556 (4.54%) patients received ARNIs. ARNI use among this cohort increased from 0.02% in 2015 to 7.48% in 2020. Patients receiving ARNIs were younger (aged 62 vs 69 years) and had a lower median ejection fraction (27% vs 32%) compared with patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs. They also had higher use of mineralocorticoid antagonists (24.1% vs 19.8%) and automatic implantable cardioverterdefibrillators (17.4% vs 13.3%). There were no significant differences in rate of ARNI use by race and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Within a large diverse integrated health system in Southern California, the rate of ARNI use has risen over time. Patients given ARNIs were younger with fewer comorbidities, while having worse ejection fraction. Racial minorities were no less likely to receive ARNIs compared with White patients. DISCLOSURES: Dr Huang had stock ownership in Gilead and Pfizer. Dr Liang received support for article processing and medical writing.

Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Severe Obesity: a Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants such as dabigatran are the preferred anticoagulant in treating atrial fibrillation (AF) patients due to their effectiveness and safety. Whether this applies to severely obese patients needs to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran with warfarin among AF patients with severe obesity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: AF patients with a BMI >40kg/m2 or a weight >120kg receiving dabigatran or warfarin between 10/01/2010 and 12/31/2019 in a large integrated health system and followed through 08/01/2020. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN MEASURES: Primary effectiveness outcome was composite thromboembolism including transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke, or systemic embolism. Primary safety outcome was composite bleeding including gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, or other bleeding. Secondary outcomes included the individual outcomes and all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to create a 1:1 matched cohort and Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of each outcome for dabigatran users compared to warfarin users. KEY RESULTS: A total of 6848 patients receiving either dabigatran or warfarin were identified. In a 1:1 matched cohort, dabigatran users had a HR of 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.91) for composite thromboembolism, a HR of 1.24 (95%CI: 1.07-1.42) for composite bleeding, and a HR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.45-0.71) for all-cause mortality when compared to warfarin users. CONCLUSIONS: Among AF patients with a BMI >40kg/m2 or a weight >120kg in a real-world clinical setting, dabigatran was effective in reducing the risk of thromboembolism and mortality but was associated with an increased risk of bleeding when compared to warfarin. Dabigatran may be a reasonable option for AF patients with severe obesity.

Characteristics of patients discharged and readmitted after COVID-19 hospitalisation within a large integrated health system in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Limited studies have explored post-discharge outcomes following Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalisation. We sought to characterise patients discharged following a COVID-19 hospitalisation within a large integrated health system in the United States. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 2180 COVID-19 patients discharged between 1 April 2020 and 31 July 2020. The primary endpoint was all-cause observation stay or inpatient readmission within 30 days from discharge. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the association between key socio-demographic and clinical characteristics with risk of 30-day readmission. RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate was 7.6% (n = 166); 30-day mortality rate was 1% (n = 19). Most readmissions were respiratory-related (58%) and occurred at a median time of 5 days post discharge. Adjusted models showed that prior hospitalisations (Odds Ratio = 2.36, [95% Confidence Interval: 1.59-3.50]), chronic pulmonary disease (1.57 [1.09-2.28]), and discharge to home health (1.46 [1.01-2.11]) were significantly associated with 30-day readmission. Longer duration from diagnosis to index admission was borderline associated with lower odds of readmission (0.95 [0.91-1.00]). CONCLUSION: Readmission and mortality rates for COVID-19 following discharge are low. Most readmissions occur early and are due to respiratory causes and may reflect the prolonged acute disease course.

Association between hypothyroidism and chronic kidney disease observed among an adult population 55 years and older.

Hypothyroidism and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are highly prevalent conditions with a potential mechanistic link. We sought to determine whether hypothyroidism is associated with CKD among a large diverse community-based cohort.A cross-sectional study was performed (January 1, 1990-December 31, 2017) within a large integrated health system. Individuals age ≥55 years of age with outpatient measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and ≥2 serum creatinine values were included. Hypothyroidism was defined as TSH >4 mIU/L and/or receipt of thyroid hormone replacement and further categorized as hypothyroid status: TSH >4 mcIU/mL and attenuated-hypothyroid status: TSH <4 mcIU/mL with receipt of thyroid hormone replacement. Euthyroidism was defined as TSH <4 mIU/L and no thyroid hormone replacement. Our primary measure was CKD defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for CKD by thyroid status.Among 378,101 individuals, 114,872 (30.4%) had hypothyroidism among whom 31,242 and 83,630 had hypothyroid and attenuated-hypothyroid statuses, respectively. Individuals with hypothyroidism had a CKD OR (95%CI) of 1.25 (1.21-1.29) compared with those with euthyroidism. Granular examination of thyroid statuses showed that hypothyroid and attenuated-hypothyroid statuses had CKD ORs (95% CI) of 1.59 (1.52-1.66) and 1.12 (1.08-1.16), respectively. A similar relationship was observed in analyses that defined CKD as an eGFR <60 L/min/1.73 m.Among individuals 55 years and older, we observed that those with hypothyroidism were more likely to have CKD. A stronger association was found among patients of hypothyroid status compared with attenuated-hypothyroid status suggesting a dose dependent relationship.