[Short-term efficacy of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia: a single-institution experience].

Objective: To explore the safety and short-term efficacy of venetoclax combined with azacitidine (Ven+AZA) in previously untreated patients unfit for standard chemotherapy and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in China. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 60 previously untreated patients unfit for standard chemotherapy and patients with R/R AML who received Ven+ AZA (venetoclax, 100 mg D1, 200 mg D2, 400 mg D3-28; azacitidine, 75 mg/m(2) D1- 7) at the Peking University Institute of Hematology from June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2021. The incidence of adverse events, complete remission (CR) /CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) rate, objective remission rate (ORR) , and minimal residual disease (MRD) status in patients with different risk stratification and gene subtypes were analyzed. Results: The median age of the patients was 54 (18-77) years, 33 (55.0%) were males, and the median follow-up time was 4.8 (1.4-26.3) months. Among the 60 patients, 24 (40.0%) were previously untreated patients unfit for standard chemotherapy, and 36 (60.0%) were R/R patients. The median mumber cycles of Ven+AZA in the two groups were both 1 (1-5) . According to the prognostic risk stratification of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, it was divided into 8 cases of favorable-risk, 2 cases of intermediate risk, and 14 cases of poor-risk. In previously untreated patients unfit for standard chemotherapy, after the first cycle of Ven+AZA, 17/24 (70.8%) cases achieved CR/CRi, 3/24 (12.5%) achieved partial remission (PR) , and the ORR was 83.3%. Among them, nine patients received a second cycle chemotherapy and two received a third cycle. Among CR/CRi patients, 8/17 (47.1%) achieved MRD negativity after two cycles of therapy. In the R/R group, after the first cycle of Ven+AZA, 21/36 (58.3%) cases achieved CR/CRi (7/21 achieved MRD negativity) , 3 achieved PR, and the ORR was 66.7%. Among R/R patients, 12 were treated for more than two cycles. There were no new CR/CRi patients after the second treatment cycle, and 14 cases (66.7%) achieved MRD negativity. According to the time from CR to hematological recurrence, the R/R group was divided into 12 cases in the favorable-risk group (CR to hematological recurrence ≥18 months) and 24 in the poor-risk group (CR to hematological recurrence<18 months, no remission after one cycle of therapy, and no remission after two or more cycles of therapy) . Eleven of 24 (45.8%) cases achieved CR/CRi after one cycle of Ven+AZA in the poor-risk R/R group, and 10 of 12 (83.3%) achieved CR/CRi in the favorable-risk R/R group, which was significantly superior to the poor-risk group (P=0.031) . After one cycle of treatment, 13 patients with IDH1/2 mutations and 4 that were TP53-positive all achieved CR/CRi. The CR/CRi rate of 18 patients with NPM1 mutations was 77.8%. Five patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 combined with KIT D816 mutation (two initial diagnoses and three recurrences) had no remission. Ven+ AZA was tolerable for AML patients. Conclusion: Ven+AZA has acceptable safety in previously untreated patients unfit for standard chemotherapy, patients with R/R AML can achieve a high response rate, and some patients can achieve MRD negativity. It is also effective in NPM1-, IDH1/IDH2-, and TP53-positive patients. The long-term efficacy remains to be observed.

[Burning mouth syndrome in the views of modern stomatology and traditional Chinese medicine].

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a common clinical disorder characterized by burning of the mouth or other discomfort, which significantly affects the quality of life of patients. The present article introduces and makes comparison of the mechanisms and clinical treatments of BMS in modern stomatology and traditional Chinese medicine. Modern stomatology studies have shown that BMS is related to the factors of neuropathy, psychology, endocrine or metabolic disorders, drug effects and local adverse stimuli. Traditional Chinese medicine suggests that BMS is mainly caused by diet, fatigue, bad emotion, poor health, oldness, etc. Individualized therapy is advocated in the treatment of BMS. Modern stomatology pays attention to comprehensive treatment for psychological disorder, systematic and oral local diseases. The thoughts of dialectical therapy and health keeping in traditional Chinese medicine also have clinical value.

[Efficacy and safety of Sorafenib as monotherapy to FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia].

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of Sorafenib as monotherapy to FLT3 positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: From April 2014 to December 2015, fourteen AML patients with FLT3 positive, 7 males and 7 females with a median age of 42 (range: 14-81) years old, were enrolled in this study. Of the 14 cases, 4 were de novo cases, 9 refractory cases and 1 relapsed case, including 78.6% patients with severe complications and 57.1% patients with KPS score less than 60 [the median KPS score was 45 (20-70) ]. The administration of Sorafenib was 400 mg twice daily and Sorafenib was continued if tolerated. The treatment response was evaluated by MICM and the data were analyzed by paired samples t test before and after Sorafenib treatment. Results: The peripheral blood WBC count [4.2 (0.9-11.8) ×109/L vs 39.6 (2.3-209.5) ×109/L, P<0.001 ], the percentage of peripheral blast cell [0.07 (0-0.54) vs 0.53 (0-0.94), P<0.001] and the percentage of bone marrow blast cell [0.266 (0.020-0.880) vs 0.604 (0.180-0.900), P=0.003] were significantly decreased after Sorafenib monotherapy compared with before. The overall response rate was 57.1% (8/14), including 5 cases (35.7%) with complete remission (CR). Of 4 de novo cases, 2 achieved CR, 1 with PR, 1 with NR; 3 of 10 refractory and relapsed patients achieved CR and 2 cases achieved PR, 5 cases NR. The median duration of achieving molecular remission (FLT3-ITD negative) after Sorafenib was 46(33-72) days, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 53 (28-175) days. Conclusion: Sorafenib shows activity in FLT3-ITD mutation positive AML patients. Sorafenib monotherapy could be used as a treatment option for elderly patients or patients with severe complications, and refractory and relapsed patients with not suitable for intensive chemotherapy.