Phototherapy for atopic dermatitis: A survey of European practice.

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy is used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Evidence for its efficacy, impact on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and short- and long-term safety with real-life usage is weak. OBJECTIVES: We established a taskforce to examine how phototherapy is currently being used as a treatment for AD across the United Kingdom and Europe to inform our understanding and guide future research into management of patients with AD using UV-based phototherapies. METHODS: An anonymous electronic multiple-response survey exploring phototherapy prescribing practices and experience of phototherapy modalities was developed by the study authors and sent to members of phototherapy networks from the United Kingdom and Europe. Responses were received between February and July 2021. RESULTS: About 144 respondents from 27 European countries completed the survey. NBUVB was the most widely used [n = 138 (96%)]. Home-based NBUVB was available in 8/27 countries (25/144 respondents, 17%). Oral psoralen-UVA (PUVA) was more widely available than bath PUVA (n = 106, 74% vs. n = 60, 42%) and used mainly in adult patients. 49/144 (34%) of respondents had access to UVA1. Phototherapy would be considered instead of systemic treatment in 96% of adults and 82% of children for NBUVB, versus 40% of adults and 3% of children for PUVA. Starting doses, standard dosing increments, length of treatment courses, lifetime limits for treatments and thresholds for performing annual skin assessments varied between responders. CONCLUSIONS: NBUVB was the most widely used phototherapy for AD in adult and paediatric patients, while PUVA and UVA1 were less used. Prescribing practices varied considerably, highlighting the lack of consensus practice in many different aspects of phototherapy for the treatment of AD in children and adults. This indicates that further studies are required to determine optimal phototherapeutic regimens for AD and informs our understanding of parameters that should be included in future high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCT) of phototherapy.

Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is associated with a reduction in topical corticosteroid and clinical improvement in atopic dermatitis: a historical inception cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of use, the magnitude of efficacy of narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy for atopic dermatitis (AD) beyond industry-sponsored trials remains unclear. AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of NB-UVB in AD under real-world conditions. METHODS: We conducted a historical inception cohort study using automated recording of dispensed drugs to provide an objective treatment outcome in a large population catchment of 420 000 people over 15 years. We analysed clinical treatment outcomes, recorded multicentre and prospectively over 15 years, of a large AD treatment cohort (n = 844), along with the drugs dispensed to this cohort. RESULTS: The majority (70%) of patients with AD received significantly fewer topical corticosteroids (TCS) during the 12-month window after finishing NB-UVB compared with the 12-month window before starting the treatment (median reduction from 37.5 to 19.7 g/month). The number of patients dispensed with oral corticosteroids and antihistamines also dropped significantly (from 20% to 10% and from 69% to 31%, respectively), while all AD-unrelated drugs dispensed remained unchanged. Clinically, NB-UVB treatment achieved a 'clear' or 'almost clear' status in 48.7% of patients, while 20.4% achieved 'moderate clearance'. Treatment outcomes scores were validated by a strong correlation with reduction in AD-specific drug treatment. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the significant efficacy of NB-UVB for AD under conditions of routine care.

A new approach to actinic folliculitis: prophylactic narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: We have observed an increasing number of patients referred to the Scottish Photobiology Service (SPS), who were later diagnosed with actinic folliculitis (AF) and had positive phototesting results. Treatment options for AF are limited, with only a few reports in the literature. The use of prophylactic narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy for AF has not previously been described, and we report on this for the first time. AIM: To analyse the clinical characteristics, phototesting results and responses to treatment for patients with AF diagnosed by the SPS. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review over 10 years of all case notes of patients who were assessed and diagnosed with AF through the SPS, based at the Photobiology Unit, Dundee, UK. RESULTS: All 10 patients were women. Mean age of onset was 25 years and mean time to referral for investigation was 7 years. The commonest site involved was the face, with the main clinical feature being monomorphic pustules appearing after sunlight exposure. The eruption could be provoked with iterative doses of broadband UVA irradiation in five patients. All patients were offered photoprotective advice and prophylactic NB-UVB phototherapy. Five patients proceeded with phototherapy; four of these completed the desensitization course and all four reported either a delay in symptom onset or total prevention of rash induction, with complete efficacy of desensitization maintained for 3 years in one patient. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the successful use of UVA provocation testing as a diagnostic tool in AF. Additionally, we recommend the use of prophylactic NB-UVB phototherapy in AF as an effective and well-tolerated approach.

Review of an established UK home phototherapy service 1998-2011: improving access to a cost-effective treatment for chronic skin disease.

OBJECTIVES: To review the Tayside home phototherapy service, including numbers of patients treated, diagnoses and outcomes, side-effects and safety, cost-effectiveness and absolute costs. To consider why home or outpatient phototherapy is not available to all patients who might benefit and how this could be addressed. STUDY DESIGN: Observational and cost analysis. METHODS: Analysis of the Tayside home phototherapy database 1998 and 2011, home phototherapy patient questionnaires, outcome data, costs and a comparison with outpatient phototherapy. Review of literature and current national guidelines for phototherapy, traditional systemic and biologic therapies for psoriasis. RESULTS: 298 courses of home narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) phototherapy were undertaken by 212 patients between 1998 and 2011, five courses in 1998 increasing to 36 in 2011. The main diagnoses treated were psoriasis (72%), atopic dermatitis (8%), and desensitization of photodermatosis (7%). For psoriasis, 74.5% achieved clearance or minimal residual activity in a median of 30 exposures (range 10-60). The estimated costs to the hospital ranged from £229 to £314 per course (£307 to £422 per effective course for psoriasis), compared with £114 for out-patient therapy (£149 per effective course for psoriasis). The total cost to society (hospital and patient costs) is around £410 per course, compared to an estimated £550 for outpatient therapy for this group of patients. Treatment was well tolerated, erythema rates were similar to outpatient therapy, there were no complaints and the vast majority would choose home over outpatient phototherapy if required in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital supervised home phototherapy appears as safe and effective as outpatient therapy and provides equality of access for patients who cannot attend for outpatient therapy. These patients may otherwise be inadequately treated or given more costly and higher risk systemic therapies, particularly for psoriasis. Commissioners and clinicians involved in dermatology services should provide accessible phototherapy for all patients who might benefit, utilizing home phototherapy where outpatient access is not possible.

Self-administration of hospital-based narrowband ultraviolet B (TL-01) phototherapy: a feasibility study in an outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: Self-administration of narrowband (TL-01) ultraviolet (UV)B phototherapy by patients at home is a safe and effective mode of treatment. Could selected patients self-administer phototherapy in hospital? OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of outpatient self-administration of UVB phototherapy as a potential service development. METHODS: A total of 20 patients with psoriasis (n = 15) and eczema (n = 5) (13 female, mean age 32 years, range 17-56 years) were included in this pilot project. Patients underwent a training programme over 2 days, which included a minimal erythemal dose test and supervised treatment, prior to commencing self-administration of phototherapy. Questionnaires were used to gather feedback from patients and staff. RESULTS: Treatment data were collected for 18 of the 20 patients. The mean number of exposures was 25 (range 3-45), and the mean cumulative dose was 16 J cm(-2) (range 0·23-41·27 J cm(-2) ). No unexpected adverse effects were noted. These results were similar to those of a sample group of outpatients who had nurse-administered UVB phototherapy, for whom the mean number of exposures was 24 (range 4-49) and the mean cumulative dose was 17 J cm(-2) (range 0·53-71·16 J cm(-2) ). Thirteen patients completed the questionnaires. All concluded that the training programme sufficiently prepared them for self-administering phototherapy, and 12 reported that they would be happy to self-administer treatment in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Self-administration of UVB phototherapy is practicable, safe and effective for most selected patients. This mode of treatment provides training and support for patients to gain more control over management of their skin disease, empowering them to take an active role in their treatment. Self-administration of UVB phototherapy by outpatients provides an intermediate level of care between nurse-administered hospital phototherapy and self-administered home phototherapy.

Ultraviolet A1 phototherapy: a British Photodermatology Group workshop report.

Whole-body ultraviolet (UV)A1 (340-400 nm) phototherapy was first introduced 30 years ago, but is currently available in the UK in only three dermatology departments. A workshop to discuss UVA1 was held by the British Photodermatology Group in May 2009, the aim of which was to provide an overview of UVA1 phototherapy and its role in practice, and to identify areas in which further studies are required. The conclusions were that UVA1 phototherapy is an effective treatment in several inflammatory skin diseases, including localized scleroderma and atopic eczema (AE); however, deficiencies and limitations exist in the published evidence base. For most diseases, such as AE, other treatments also exist, which are generally more effective than UVA1. However, for some diseases, particularly morphoea, the evidence of efficacy is stronger for UVA1 than for other treatments. Acute adverse effects of UVA1 are minimal. The risk of long-term adverse effects, particularly skin cancer, is unknown. Medium to high doses of UVA1 are needed for efficacy in most situations, but the equipment to deliver such doses is large, expensive and difficult to install. UVA1 is currently underprovided, and the recommendation of the workshop is that more tertiary centres should have access to UVA1 phototherapy in the UK.

Glutathione S-transferase genotype is associated with sensitivity to psoralen-ultraviolet A photochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: There is marked interpatient variation in responses to psoralen-ultraviolet A (PUVA) photochemotherapy. Identification of molecular biomarkers of PUVA sensitivity may facilitate treatment predictability.The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) influence cutaneous defence against UV radiation-induced oxidative stress and are therefore candidate biomarkers of PUVA sensitivity. Several human GSTs, including GSTM1 and GSTT1, are polymorphic, and null polymorphisms have been associated with increased UVB erythemal sensitivity and skin cancer risk. PUVA also increases skin cancer risk. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of GST genotype on PUVA sensitivity. METHODS: We investigated GST genotype in patients starting PUVA (n=111) and the effects of 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) on antioxidant response element (ARE)-regulated gene expression in mammalian cells. RESULTS: Lower minimal phototoxic doses (MPD) (P=0·022) and higher serum 8-MOP concentrations (P=0·052) were seen in GSTM1-null allele homozygotes compared with patients with one or two active alleles. In a subset of patients with psoriasis (n=50), the GSTM1 genotype was not associated with PUVA outcomes, although MPD [hazard ratio (HR) 1·37; 95% confidence interval (CI) for HR 1·15-1·64] and GSTT1-null (HR 2·39; 95% CI for HR 1·31-4·35) and GSTP1b (HR 1·96; 95% CI for HR 1·10-3·51) genotypes were associated with clearance of psoriasis in this patient group. Exposure of mammalian cells to 8-MOP induced gene expression via the ARE, a regulatory sequence in promoters of cytoprotective genes including GSTs, suggesting that these genes may be implicated in 8-MOP metabolism. CONCLUSION: The polymorphic human GSTs are associated with PUVA sensitivity. Further studies are required to examine the clinical relevance of these preliminary findings.

Within-patient right-left blinded comparison of diode (810 nm) laser therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for hair removal.

Excessive facial hair in women can cause significant psychological distress. A variety of treatment methods are available, including lasers and, more recently, intense pulsed light (IPL) sources. There are very few studies comparing laser and IPL devices. The purpose of our study was to compare a laser diode device with an IPL, using a within-patient, right-left, assessor-blinded, controlled, study design. Hair counts were made, using coded close-up photographs. Treatments were carried out on three occasions at 6-week intervals, and a final assessment was made 6 weeks following the third treatment. Patient self-assessment was also included. Nine women were recruited, and seven completed the study. Average hair counts in a 16 cm(2) area before and after treatment were, respectively, 42.4 and 10.4 (laser), 38.1 and 20.4 (IPL), 45.3 and 44.7 (control). Both laser and IPL reduced the hair count substantially; laser vs control was significant at P=0.028, but IPL vs control had P=0.13, suggesting that more subjects or more treatments were required if statistical significance were to be achieved. Despite subjecting the patients to higher pain scores and more inflammation, laser was preferred by five patients; two preferred IPL and one had no preference.

Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) genotype influences erythemal sensitivity to psoralen-ultraviolet A photochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) is a highly polymorphic G protein-coupled receptor. Inheritance of various MC1R alleles has been associated with a red hair/fair skin phenotype, increased incidence of skin cancer and altered sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether MC1R genotype influences erythemal sensitivity to psoralen-UVA photochemotherapy (PUVA) in patients with psoriasis and other common skin diseases. METHODS: Patients (n = 111) about to start PUVA were recruited to the study. Erythemal responses were assessed visually at 72 h and 96 h following PUVA by assessment of the minimal phototoxic dose (MPD). MC1R genotype was determined by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Inheritance of the MC1R Arg(151)Cys allele was associated with a red hair phenotype (odds ratio 25.19, P = 0.0004). In contrast, inheritance of the Val(60)Leu and Arg(163)Gln SNPs was associated with increased PUVA erythemal sensitivity (reduced MPD) 72 h following treatment in all patients (n = 111; Val(60)Leu chi(2) = 5.764, P = 0.016; Arg(163)Gln chi(2) = 5.469, P = 0.019) and in a subset of patients with psoriasis (n = 55; Val(60)Leu chi(2) = 4.534, P = 0.033; Arg(163)Gln chi(2) = 7.298, P = 0.007). Inheritance of two or more MC1R SNPs was also associated with increased PUVA erythemal sensitivity (reduced MPD) in both patient groups (n = 111; chi(2) = 8.166, P = 0.017; n = 55; chi(2) = 10.303, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that MC1R genotype influences PUVA erythemal sensitivity in patients with psoriasis and other common skin diseases.

UVA1 phototherapy for genital lichen sclerosus.

BACKGROUND: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is characterized histologically by an inflammatory T-cell infiltrate, sclerosis and thickening of the dermis, and epidermal atrophy. Ultraviolet (UV) A1 therapy has been shown to be effective in the management of morphea and scleroderma, diseases that have some histological and clinical similarities with LS, and more recently in extragenital LS. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of UVA1 therapy for genital LS. METHODS: Seven women with severe genital LS uncontrolled by ultrapotent topical corticosteroids, with a median age of 62 years (range 48-78) and disease duration of 6-47 years, were treated with UVA1 therapy from a high output source. After completion of UVA1 therapy, a clinician and the patient graded the overall response of symptoms and physical signs. RESULTS: Five patients improved with therapy. Three obtained moderate improvement in overall disease severity and two had minimal improvement. Of these five, one relapsed within 3 months and another after a year. Both had a further course of UVA1 therapy, resulting in minimal improvement in one and moderate improvement in the other. In the remaining three, disease severity had improved to a point where intermittent use of topical corticosteroids resulted in acceptable control. DISCUSSION: UVA1 therapy may be of benefit in the management of vulval LS, a disease that is often poorly responsive to standard therapies. The therapy is well tolerated and could provide an acceptable therapeutic option for patients with severe disease.

UVA1 phototherapy for treatment of necrobiosis lipoidica.

The primary cause of collagen degeneration in necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) is proposed to be immunologically mediated vascular disease. Ultraviolet (UV)A1 has been used successfully to treat scleroderma in which both vascular damage and collagen dysregulation also occur. We treated six patients with NL [(five women; mean age of 32 years (range 22-70) and mean disease duration of 2.9 years (range 6 months to 5 years)] with a high-output ultraviolet (UV)A1 2-kW filtered metal halide source (Dr Hönle; Dermalight ultrA 1) having an emission spectrum of 340-440 nm. All patients had NL on the shins, which had been unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroid therapy (n = 6) and had responded minimally or not at all to TL-01 UVB (n = 2), topical psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) soaking (n = 2) or oral PUVA (n = 1) therapy. Patients received a variable number of total exposures (15-51), given 3-5 times weekly. NL resolved completely in one patient; this patient had minimal improvement after the first course of 16 exposures, but after a further 13 exposures, resolution occurred 6 months later. Two subjects obtained moderate improvement in their overall disease severity after 15 and 24 exposures, while two had only minimal improvement after 15 and 51 exposures. The remaining patient had no improvement after 16 treatments. Patients with the shortest disease duration had the greatest response. UVA1 therapy may be of benefit for the treatment of NL as an adjuvant therapy to topical corticosteroids or as a second-line alternative to other phototherapies, and may have a superior outcome in a proportion of patients.

Can St John's wort (hypericin) ingestion enhance the erythemal response during high-dose ultraviolet A1 therapy?

BACKGROUND: St John's wort (SJW) is widely used as a treatment for depression. A phototoxic reaction, due to its content of hypericin, can occur in animals and in cell culture, and has been reported in humans. Hypericin displays absorption within the ultraviolet (UV) A1 spectrum and there may therefore be a potential for phototoxicity if taken during high-dose UVA1 therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the phototoxicity risk of SJW ingestion. METHODS: Eleven adult volunteers of skin types I and II were exposed to a geometric dose series of UVA1 irradiation from a high-output source (Dermalight Ultra 1; Dr Hönle, Martinsreid, Germany; irradiance 70-77 mW cm(-2)) on the photoprotected lower back skin at eight 1.5-cm(2) test areas. Irradiation was carried out at baseline and after 10 days of SJW extract 1020 mg (equivalent to 3000 microg of hypericin) daily. Four, 8, 24 and 48 h after each exposure, the minimal erythema dose (MED) and the presence or absence of pigmentation were recorded visually and erythema was assessed objectively with an erythema meter. RESULTS: The median MED and D(0.025), an objective measure of MED, were lower at all time-points after SJW ingestion. The visual erythemal peak (lowest median MED), which was seen at 8 h postirradiation, was lower after SJW (median 14 J cm(-2), range 10-56) than at baseline (median 20 J cm(-2), range 14-56) (P = 0.047). Similarly, the median D(0.025) at 8 h postirradiation was lower after SJW (median 22.0 J cm(-2), range 15.2-53.9) than at baseline (median 33.7 J cm(-2), range 22.9-136.0) (P = 0.014). The MED and D(0.025) were also significantly different at the 48-h and 4-h time-points, respectively. Significance was not reached at the 24-h time-point. Median intensity of postirradiation erythema increased at all time-points after ingestion of SJW. Despite these differences, the maximum slope of the dose-response curve was not increased after SJW ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that SJW extract has the potential to lower the erythemal threshold to UVA1 irradiation in a significant proportion of individuals and highlight the importance of ascertaining a full drug history, including herbal remedies, before initiating UVA1 phototherapy.

Does narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy work in atopic dermatitis through a local or a systemic effect?

The likely mechanisms of action of narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) in atopic dermatitis are several. We attempted, in a 12 patient prospective intraindividually controlled study, to determine whether the effect of NB-UVB in atopic dermatitis is primarily through systemic or local effects. Change in observer-assessed severity of patches of dermatitis covered during each whole-body NB-UVB treatment was compared with change in uncovered neighbouring patches. We found great variation between patients in responses. Only in two (of 12) patients was there a large difference between directly exposed and covered patch dermatitis severity. We suspect that the balance of local and systemic effects important in determining response to NB-UVB in atopic dermatitis varies from patient to patient. This study did not conclusively answer our original question, but did show that in some patients localized effects of NB-UVB are important.