Superior-Type Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Phenotype Mimicking the Slow-Fast Type.

BACKGROUND: Superior-type fast-slow (sup-F/S-) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a rare AVNRT variant using a superior slow pathway (SP) as the retrograde limb. Its intracardiac appearance, characterized by a short atrio-His (AH) interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in the His-bundle, is an initial indicator for making a diagnosis. METHODS: Among 22 consecutive patients with sup-F/S-AVNRT, 3 (age, 68-81 years) patients had an apparent slow-fast (S/F-) AVNRT characterized by a long AH interval and the earliest site of atrial activation in or superior to the His-bundle region (tachy-long-AH). RESULTS: The diagnosis of sup-F/S-AVNRT was based on the standard criteria in 2 patients and on the occurrence of Wenckebach-type atrioventricular block during tachycardia, which was attributable to a block at the lower common pathway (LCP) below the circuit of the AVNRT, detected owing to the lower common pathway potentials, in one patient. As with the typical S/F-AVNRT, tachy-long-AH was induced after a jump in the AH interval. In contrast to typical S/F-AVNRT, fluctuation in the ventriculoatrial interval was observed during the tachy-long-AH. Ventricular overdrive pacing was unable to entrain or terminate the tachy-long-AH. Moreover, the tachy-long-AH reciprocally transited to/from sup-F/S-AVNRT spontaneously or was triggered by ventricular contractions while the atrial cycle length and earliest site of atrial activation remained unchanged. Both tachycardias were cured by ablation at a single site in the right-side para-Hisian region of 2 patients and the noncoronary aortic cusp of one patient. Collectively, the essential circuit of both tachycardias was identical, and the tachy-long-AH was diagnosed as another phenotype of sup-F/S-AVNRT accompanied by sustained antegrade conduction via another bystander slow pathway breaking through the His-bundle owing to the repetitive antegrade block at the lower common pathway, thus representing a long AH interval during the ongoing sup-F/S-AVNRT. CONCLUSIONS: An unknown sup-F/S-AVNRT phenotype exists that apparently mimics the typical S/F-AVNRT and is also an unknown subtype of apparent S/F-AVNRT.

Unique electrophysiological properties of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia characterized by a shortening of retrograde conduction time via a slow pathway manifested during atrial induction.

INTRODUCTION: Electrophysiological properties of reentry circuits of fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (F/S-AVNRT) may contribute to cyclic variability after atrial induction. METHODS: In 156 atrial inductions of 33 patients with F/S-AVNRT, we measured the atrio-His (AH) and His-atrial (HA) intervals in the first cycle after the induction (AH[1] and HA[1], respectively), those in the second cycle (AH [2] and HA [2], respectively), and those during tachycardia that maintained a stable cycle length AH[T] and HA[T], respectively), and calculated the value of AH(1) minus AH(T) [ΔAH] and the value of HA(1) minus HA(T) [ΔHA] in each induction. According to the sum of ΔAH and ΔHA, tachycardia variability was classified as incremental (<-20), balanced (-20 to 20), or decremental (>20). RESULTS: ΔAH and ΔHA were significantly different between the three responses: 6 ± 28 and -67 ± 39 in 55 inductions (35%) with an incremental response, 20 ± 10 and -23 ± 28 in 59 (38%) with a balanced response, and 54 ± 44 and 4 ± 50 in 42 (27%) with a decremental response, respectively. Incremental response was reproducibly and consistently observed in 33% of patients. HA(2) was similar to HA(T) in inductions with an incremental response. These results suggest that incremental response can be manifested only in the first cycle when HA(1) is excessively shortened, approximating a retrograde conduction time over a slow pathway, in contrast, and far superior to a decremental delay of AH(1). CONCLUSION: In specific patients with F/S-AVNRT, poorly recognized, electrophysiological properties of shortening a retrograde conduction time over a slow pathway was manifested during atrial induction.

Atypical Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Using a Slow Pathway Extending to the Superoanterior Right Atrium.

We report a case of atypical fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using a slow pathway variant extending to the superoanterior right atrium. The AVNRT diagnosis was confirmed by using standard electrophysiological criteria that exclude a diagnosis of atrial tachycardia and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was found in the superoanterior right atrium adjacent to the tricuspid annulus, where the first delivery of radiofrequency energy terminated and eliminated the inducibility of the tachycardia.

Pseudo-postpacing interval of diastolic potential after entrainment pacing of remote bystander pathway in reentrant ventricular tachycardia.

After entrainment pacing, the postpacing interval of a diastolic potential may be misinterpreted if the distal tip of the ablation catheter captures a remote bystander pathway adjacent to the critical isthmus of a complex reentrant circuit in a structurally diseased heart. We discuss this possible pitfall of entrainment mapping of reentrant ventricular tachycardia, observed after a healed myocardial infarction.

Electroanatomically estimated length of slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

The length of the slow pathway (SP-L) in atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (NRT) has never been measured clinically. We studied the relationship among (a) SP-L, i.e., the distance between the most proximal His bundle (H) recording and the most posterior site of radiofrequency (RF) delivery associated with a junctional rhythm, (b) the length of Koch's triangle (Koch-L), (c) the conduction time over the slow pathway (SP-T), measured by the AH interval during AVNRT at baseline, and (d) the distance between H and the site of successful ablation (SucABL-L) in 26 women and 20 men (mean age 64.6 ± 11.6 years), using a stepwise approach and an electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS). SP-L (15.0 ± 5.8 mm) was correlated with Koch-L (18.6 ± 5.6 mm; R 2 = 0.1665, P < 0.005), SP-T (415 ± 100 ms; R 2 = 0.3425, P = 0.036), and SucABL-L (11.6 ± 4.7 mm; R 2 = 0.5243, P < 0.0001). The site of successful ablation was located within 10 mm of the posterior end of the SP in 38 patients (82.6 %). EAMS-guided RF ablation, using a stepwise approach, revealed individual variations in SP-L related to the size of Koch's triangle and AH interval during AVNRT. Since the site of successful ablation was also correlated with SP-L and was usually located near the posterior end of the SP, ablating anteriorly, away from the posterior end, is not a prerequisite for the success of ablation procedures.