Validation of an emergency triage scale for obstetrics and gynaecology: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of a four-level triage scale for obstetrics and gynaecology emergencies and to explore the factors associated with an optimal triage. DESIGN: Thirty clinical vignettes presenting the most frequent indications for obstetrics and gynaecology emergency consultations were evaluated twice using a computerised simulator. SETTING: The study was performed at the emergency unit of obstetrics and gynaecology at the Geneva University Hospitals. SAMPLE: The vignettes were submitted to nurses and midwives. METHODS: We assessed inter- and intra-rater reliability and agreement using a two-way mixed-effects intra-class correlation (ICC). We also performed a generalised linear mixed model to evaluate factors associated triage correctness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Triage acuity. RESULTS: We obtained a total of 1191 evaluations. Inter-rater reliability was good (ICC 0.748; 95% CI 0.633-0.858) and intra-rater reliability was almost perfect (ICC 0.812; 95% CI 0.726-0.889). We observed a wide variability: the mean number of questions varied from 6.9 to 18.9 across individuals and from 8.4 to 16.9 across vignettes. Triage acuity was underestimated in 12.4% of cases and overestimated in 9.3%. Undertriage occurred less frequently for gynaecology compared with obstetric vignettes [odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% CI 0.23-0.91; P = 0.035] and decreased with the number of questions asked (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.88-0.99; P = 0.047). Certification in obstetrics and gynaecology emergencies was an independent factor for the avoidance of undertriage (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.17-0.70; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The four-level triage scale is a valid and reliable tool for the integrated emergency management of obstetrics and gynaecology patients. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The Swiss Emergency Triage Scale is a valid and reliable tool for obstetrics and gynaecology emergency triage.

Is intrapartum vibratory acoustic stimulation a valid alternative to fetal scalp pH determination?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between fetal heart rate accelerations, whether spontaneous or induced by vibratory acoustic stimulation, and subsequent scalp pH values in presence of a suspicious intrapartum fetal heart rate tracing, and thereby assess the ability of accelerations to predict a concurrent normal fetal scalp blood pH. DESIGN: Prospective observational study of 253 labours involving 421 pH samples. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital of Genoeva. INTERVENTION: Vibratory acoustic stimulation through the maternal abdominal wall for five seconds prior to fetal blood sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spontaneous fetal heart rate reactivity (accelerations) in the 10 min preceding vibratory acoustic stimulation, vibratory acoustic-induced reactivity prior to fetal blood sampling, and scalp pH value. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of a reactive fetal heart rate response after vibratory acoustic stimulation was 78% (95% CI 73-84%) and 97% (95% CI 94-99%) for scalp pH values of > 7.25 and > or = 7.20, respectively. Similar observations occurred with spontaneous reactivity. Of concern, 7 out of 31 (23%) occasions where the scalp blood pH was less than 7.20 appeared to be associated with a normal fetal heart rate response to vibratory acoustic stimulation. CONCLUSION: Fetal heart rate acceleration induced by vibratory acoustic stimulation was significantly associated with a normal scalp blood pH higher than 7.25. However, vibratory acoustic stimulation offers no advantage over observation of spontaneous fetal heart rate tracings and cannot safely replace fetal blood sampling during labour.