Should a History of Extraperitoneal Disease Be a Contraindication to Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases?

BACKGROUND: Survival improvements have been reported in selected patients affected by colorectal peritoneal metastases who were undergoing cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy. Treatment of peritoneal metastases associated with extraperitoneal disease is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the prognostic impact of a history of extraperitoneal disease that was curatively treated either at the same time as or before the onset of peritoneal metastases. DESIGN: We reviewed 2 prospective databases. Peritoneal involvement was scored by Peritoneal Cancer Index. SETTINGS: Our study was conducted in 2 high-volume peritoneal malignancy management institutions. PATIENTS: A total of 148 patients with peritoneal metastases were included. In 27 patients, extraperitoneal disease involving the liver (n = 23), lung (n = 1), both lung and liver (n = 2), or inguinal lymph nodes and liver (n = 1) was curatively treated either simultaneously with peritoneal metastases (n = 22) or before their onset (n = 5). INTERVENTIONS: All of the macroscopic tumors were removed by means of peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections. Microscopic residual disease was treated by mitomycin C/cisplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 34.6 months (95% CI, 22.6-65.7 mo), 5-year survival of patients treated for both peritoneal and extraperitoneal disease versus peritoneal metastases alone was 16.5% versus 52.0% (p = 0.019). After multivariate analysis, reduced survival correlated with extraperitoneal disease (p = 0.001), Peritoneal Cancer Index >19 (p = 0.004), and peritoneal residual disease >2.5 mm (p = 0.018). Three prognostic groups were defined, and median survival was not reached for group 1 (Peritoneal Cancer Index ≤19 and no extraperitoneal disease), reached in 27.0 months for group 2 (Peritoneal Cancer Index ≤9 and extraperitoneal disease), and reached in 11.6 months for group 3 (Peritoneal Cancer Index >19 and no extraperitoneal disease or Peritoneal Cancer Index >9 and extraperitoneal disease). LIMITATIONS: The main study limitation is its observational nature. CONCLUSIONS: A history of extraperitoneal disease is associated with poorer prognosis. However, survival benefit may be obtained in selected patients with limited peritoneal involvement. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A655.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) at the Time of Primary Curative Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer at High Risk for Metachronous Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are maximally effective in early-stage colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM); however, the use of HIPEC to treat subclinical-stage PM remains controversial. This prospective two-center study assessed adjuvant HIPEC in CRC patients at high risk for metachronous PM ( www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02575859). METHODS: During 2006-2012, a total of 22 patients without systemic metastases were prospectively enrolled to receive HIPEC simultaneously with curative surgery, plus adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (oxaliplatin/irinotecan-containing ± biologics), based on primary tumor-associated criteria: resected synchronous ovarian (n = 2) or minimal peritoneal (n = 6) metastases, primaries directly invading other organs (n = 4) or penetrating the visceral peritoneum (n = 10). A control group retrospectively included 44 matched (1:2) patients undergoing standard treatments and no HIPEC during the same period. The cumulative PM incidence was calculated in a competing-risks framework. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable for all groups. Median follow-up was 65.2 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 50.9-79.5] in the HIPEC group and 34.5 months (95 % CI 21.1-47.9) in the control group. The 5-year cumulative PM incidence was 9.3 % in the HIPEC group and 42.5 % in the control group (p = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 81.3 % in the HIPEC group versus 70.0 % in the control group (p = 0.047). No operative death occurred. Grade 3-4 [National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4] morbidity rates were 18.2 % in the HIPEC group and 25 % in controls (p = 0.75). At multivariate analysis, HIPEC correlated to lower PM cumulative incidence [hazard ratio (HR) 0.04, 95 % CI 0.01-0.31; p = 0.002], and better OS (HR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.07-0.89; p = 0.039) and progression-free survival (HR 0.31, 95 % CI 0.11-0.85; p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant HIPEC may benefit CRC patients at high-risk for peritoneal failure. These results warrant confirmation in phase III trials.

Pilot study of adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer at high risk for the development of peritoneal metastases.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The prognosis of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer has recently improved with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Although outcomes are further improved when early stage peritoneal metastases are treated, adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has never been thoroughly addressed. This prospective pilot study assessed feasibility, safety and efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with primary curative surgery in colorectal cancer at high risk for peritoneal metastases. METHODS: Twelve patients were prospectively selected according to predetermined risk factors for the development of peritoneal metastases. Patients underwent conventional colon surgery, closed-abdomen mitomycin-C plus cisplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and cytoreductive surgical procedures, as needed. RESULTS: Preoperative tumor-related risk factors were confirmed by intraoperative findings and pathological examination in all patients: minimal synchronous peritoneal metastases (n = 2), synchronous ovarian metastases (n = 1), positive peritoneal washing cytology (n = 2), primary tumor directly invading other organs (n = 6), or penetrating visceral peritoneum (n = 1). Major morbidity occurred in 2 patients and operative death in none. Median follow-up was 49 months (range, 22-72). Peritoneal metastases occurred in 1 patient and distant metastases in 2. Five-year overall survival was 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative/early intraoperative assessment can reliably identify colorectal cancer patients at high risk for peritoneal metastases. Adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is well tolerated and safe. These preliminary results would support the design of future phase-III trials of adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Learning curve for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancies: analysis of two centres.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the learning curve (LC) of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in treating peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) in two centers and evaluated in which extent surgical tutoring could abbreviate the learning process. METHODS: Six hundred and forty-one cases submitted to CRS using peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC were considered. After having overcome its own LC, the NCI of Milan has provided technical assistance to Bentivoglio's centre for the development of a new PSM program since 2003. The risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio test (RA-SPRT) was employed to assess the LC of the two centers. Outcomes were incomplete cytoreduction, G3-5 morbidity (NCI-CTCAE.v3) and procedure-related mortality (PRM). RESULTS: Rates of incomplete cytoreduction, G3-5 morbidity, and PRM were 8.4%, 30.1%, and 3.9%, respectively, in the entire series. The breaking points of the LC concerning incomplete cytoreduction, G3-5 morbidity, and PRM were achieved at 141, 158, and 144 cases, in the Milan's experience, and at 126, 134, and 60 cases in the Bentivoglio's experience. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical tutoring could substantially shorten the steep LC associated with CRS and HIPEC. Our data should be confirmed by further studies on LC focusing oncological outcomes. Other factors that could influence the length of learning process should be identified.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic chemotherapy: a 7-year single-center experience.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare clinical entity characterized by diffuse intraabdominal gelatinous collections with mucinous implants on the peritoneal surfaces and omentum. This condition should be considered a borderline malignancy with disease progression over time. Encouraging treatment results have been recently reported with the combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: . From December 2003 to December 2010, 18 patients with PMP were referred to our institution. All patients underwent peritonectomy and CRS combined with HIPEC in accordance with Sugarbaker's procedure. RESULTS: The mean Peritoneal Cancer Index score was 27.6 (range, 5-39). Twelve (67%) patients had disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and 6 (33%) peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis. Optimal cytoreduction with no visible residual disease or residual disease ≤2.5 mm in diameter was achieved in all patients. The mean duration of the surgical procedure including HIPEC was 9 hours and 30 minutes (range, 5-13 hours); major morbidity occurred in 30% of patients and the mortality was 11%. The mean follow-up was 27 months (range, 1-72) and the 5-year overall survival 66%. CONCLUSIONS: In line with the existing literature, our experience suggests that patients with PMP could benefit from CRS + HIPEC in terms of survival and locoregional disease control.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as upfront therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: multi-institutional phase-II trial.

OBJECTIVE: The primary end-point of this multi-institutional phase-II trial was to assess results in terms of overall survival after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in treatment-naive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with advanced peritoneal involvement. Secondary end-points were treatment morbi-mortality and outcome effects of time to subsequent adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (TTC). METHODS: Twenty-six women with stage III-IV EOC were prospectively enrolled in 4 Italian centers to undergo CRS and closed-abdomen HIPEC with cisplatin and doxorubicin. Then they received systemic chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) for 6 cycles. RESULTS: Macroscopically complete cytoreduction was achieved in 15 patients; only minimal residual disease (≤2.5 mm) remained in 11. Major complications occurred in four patients and postoperative death in one. After a median follow-up of 25 months, 5-year overall survival was 60.7% and 5-year progression-free survival 15.2% (median 30 months). Excluding operative death, all the patients underwent systemic chemotherapy at a median of 46 days from combined treatment (range: 29-75). The median number of cycles per patient was 6 (range: 1-8). The time to chemotherapy did not affect the OS or PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with advanced stage EOC, upfront CRS and HIPEC provided promising results in terms of outcome. Morbidity was comparable to aggressive cytoreduction without HIPEC. Postoperative recovery delayed the initiation of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy but not sufficiently to impact negatively on survival. These data warrant further evaluation in a randomized clinical trial.

[Adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer at risk of carcinomatosis: preliminary experience of a single centre]. / Chemioipertermia intraperitoneale adiuvante in pazienti con carcinoma colorettale a rischio di carcinosi: esperienza preliminare di un singolo centro.

The treatment of patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis is still debated since the absence of peritoneal disease synchronous with the primitive cancer makes the application of aggressive treatments less obvious. In this subset of patients hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), after the resection of the primitive cancer, may improve long-term survival. Over the period from December 2003 to June 2008 142 patients affected by different kinds of cancers underwent HIPEC in the surgical division of Bentivoglio Hospital, A.U.S.L. Bologna. In 13 patients HIPEC was combined only with the resection of the primitive cancer and no major cytoreductive surgery was performed. Nine of these 13 patients were affected by colorectal cancer and at high risk of developing carcinomatosis. The average surgical time was 420 min (range: 300-510). No intraoperative complications occurred, but 3 cases of postoperative morbidity were reported; only 1 of these was a major complication At an average follow-up of 22 months 1 patient with a liver metastasis died of complications unrelated to progression of the disease, 1 patient had a lymph node relapse and is currently on systemic chemotherapy, while the remaining 7 patients are alive and free from peritoneal disease.