Spinal segmental and supraspinal mechanisms underlying the pain-relieving effects of spinal cord stimulation: an experimental study in a rat model of neuropathy.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may alleviate certain forms of neuropathic pain; its mechanisms of action are, however, not fully understood. Previous studies have mainly been focused onto segmental spinal mechanisms, though there is evidence indicating a supraspinal involvement. This study aims to evaluate the relative importance of segmental and supraspinal mechanisms related to the activation of the dorsal columns (DCs). Rats were used to induce the spared nerve injury neuropathy and simultaneously subjected to chronic bilateral DC lesions at the C6-C8 level. Two pairs of miniature electrodes were implanted in each animal, with a monopolar system placed in the dorsal epidural space at a low thoracic level (below lesion) and a bipolar system placed onto the dorsal column nuclei (above lesion). Stimulation (50 Hz, 0.2 ms, 2-4V, 5 min) was applied via either type of electrodes, and tests for sensitivity to tactile and thermal stimuli were used to assess its inhibitory effects. Various receptor antagonists {bicuculline (GABA(A)), saclofen (GABA(B)), ketanserine (5HT(2)), methysergide (5HT(1-2)), phentolamine (α-adrenergic), propranolol (ß-adrenergic), sulpiride (D(2)/D(3) dopamine) or saline were injected prior to the SCS. Rostral and caudal stimulations produced a comparable inhibition of neuropathic manifestations, and these effects were attenuated by about 50% after DC lesions. Pretreatment with the various receptor antagonists differentially influenced the effects of rostral and caudal stimulation. Our findings suggest that both supraspinal and segmental mechanisms are activated by SCS, and that in this model with DC lesions, rostral and caudal stimulations may activate different synaptic circuitries and transmitter systems.

A thymulin analogue peptide with powerful inhibitory effects on pain of neurogenic origin.

The effects of a synthetic peptide analog of thymulin (PAT) were tested on nociceptive behavior in two animal models for peripheral mononeuropathy and in another two models for capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. Treatment with PAT (0.25-25 microg/rat, i.p.) produced significant reduction of the mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia in rats subjected to either chronic constriction injury (CCI) or spared nerve injury (SNI) models for mononeuropathy. Cold allodynia was moderately reduced in the CCI model. The inhibition of neuropathic manifestations peaked at 1-2 h post-treatment and disappeared in 3-4 h. Daily treatment with PAT, however, produced progressive attenuation of all neuropathic manifestations in the SNI model. On the other hand, pretreatment with similar doses of PAT produced dose-dependent reduction of the hyperalgesia induced by intraplantar injection of capsaicin (10 microg in 50 microl). The highest dose of PAT (50 microg) produced significant reduction of abdominal aversive behavior induced by i.p injection of capsaicin (20 microg in 100 microl). Compared with the effects of treatment with morphine or meloxicam (injected at single doses known to produce analgesia), PAT exerted equal or stronger inhibitory effects on neuropathic manifestations. The reported results suggest a possible direct action of PAT on afferent nerve fibers but its mechanisms remain to be determined.

Attenuation of neuropathic pain by segmental and supraspinal activation of the dorsal column system in awake rats.

In addition to its involvement in the transmission of neuropathic pain, the dorsal column system has been shown to have analgesic effects when electrically stimulated. The segmental or supraspinal origin of the analgesia, however, has not been clearly delineated. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the contribution of supraspinal mechanisms to the inhibition of allodynia and hyperalgesia in two different rat models of mononeuropathy. Mononeuropathy was induced, under deep anesthesia, in several groups of rats (n=7 each) following either the chronic constriction injury or the spared nerve injury model. Mechanical and cold allodynia were assessed by the Von Frey monofilaments and by the acetone drop test, respectively. Thermal hyperalgesia was assessed by the paw withdrawal and hot plate tests. Bipolar electrodes for dorsal column stimulation were implanted chronically in all rats on the dorsal aspect of the medulla at the level of the obex. Selective dorsal column bilateral lesions were performed at the upper cervical level in some groups of rats. Dorsal column nuclear stimulation, rostral to selective dorsal spinal lesions, produced strong inhibitory effects on the allodynia and hyperalgesia observed in both models of mononeuropathy. These effects were comparable to those observed following similar stimulations in rats with an intact spinal cord. Our results demonstrate strong inhibitory effects of dorsal column stimulation on neuropathic pain. This inhibition can be attributed to the activation of brainstem pain-modulating centers via rostral projections of the dorsal column nuclei.

Inhibitory effects from various types of dorsal column and raphe magnus stimulations on nociceptive withdrawal flexion reflexes.

Most of the clinical and research reports agree about the analgesic effects of dorsal column (DC) stimulation, but there is no unanimity about the neural mechanisms involved in this stimulation. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of segmental and rostral activation of the DCs and to investigate whether these effects are mediated through a brainstem spinal loop. Decerebrate-decerebellate cats were subjected to selective DC lesions at C(1) and C(3) spinal cervical levels and their reflex reactions to natural or electrical nociceptive stimuli were monitored either as withdrawal flexion reflexes or as motorneuronal discharges. Conditioning stimulation was performed as train of shocks (100 Hz, for 1 to 10 min or 300 Hz for 30 ms) applied on the DCs either rostral (DCr) or caudal (DCc) to the spinal lesions or on the raphe magnus (RM). Conditioning trains for 5-10 min applied on DCr inhibited the withdrawal flexion reflexes recorded as toe flexion (90% of the control). Comparisons of the effects of DCr, DCc or RM of conditioning stimuli were made on the discharges of 110 motorneurons recorded in isolated ventral root fibers. Conditioning stimulation applied to DCc produced short lived inhibition (in about 60%) or facilitation (in about 30% of the neurons) while DCr or RM conditioning produced inhibition in 90% of neurons which outlasted the duration of the conditioning trains. It was also shown that repetitive application of conditioning train on either DCr or RM resulted in longer duration of inhibition than that observed following DCc conditioning. We conclude that the stronger inhibition of motorneuronal discharges, evoked by nociceptive stimuli, is obtained by rostral activation of the DCs and that long term effects of DCst are mediated through a DC-brainstem-spinal loop.