Pharmacokinetics of linezolid treatment using intravenous and oral administrations in extremely premature infants.

INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is the usual antibiotic treatment in coagulase-negative staphylococcus sepsis in premature infants but causes renal toxicity. As linezolid is effective in Gram-positive cocci infection, and devoid of renal side-effects, it has been used in Nantes neonatal intensive care units and linezolid plasma concentrations were monitored. AIM: The aims of this study are to report data on linezolid concentrations in premature infants, describe clinical and bacteriological evolution during treatment, and determine potential side effects. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of premature infants treated with linezolid in Nantes Hospital from January 2008 through November 2011 was conducted. Linezolid plasma concentrations, possible side effects due to linezolid, and clinical response to linezolid treatment were collected from folder review. RESULTS: Twenty-four linezolid plasma concentrations were monitored in 16 premature patients, at steady state for continuous intravenous administration or 7 ± 1.5 h after last oral administration. Except for one case, linezolid plasma concentrations were ≥minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) for linezolid for both parenteral and oral administrations. We observed three cases of thrombocytopenia, two of leukopenia, three of neutropenia, and one of severe hyperlactacidemia, resolving after discontinuation of treatment. Clinical signs of infection resolved in 13/16 cases. Bacteria were coagulase-negative Staphylococci in 12/16 cases and were eradicated in 9/12 evaluable cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports an adequate linezolid plasma concentration with regard to the linezolid MIC in extremely premature infants. However, considering adverse events reported, its use should be cautious and may concern only oral administration during the late phase of infection, to limit paradoxical catheter use to treat nosocomial infections. Moreover, safe and efficient anti-Staphylococcus therapies should be identified to treat this vulnerable population.

In vivo activity of a novel anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cephalosporin, ceftaroline, against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis strains in a rabbit endocarditis model: a comparative study with linezolid and vancomycin.

We assessed the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of the novel parenteral broad-spectrum cephalosporin ceftaroline against Enterococcus faecalis in time-kill experiments and in a rabbit endocarditis model with simulated human dosing. Ceftaroline was more active than either vancomycin or linezolid against vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant isolates of E. faecalis.

Efficacy of ciprofloxacin in an experimental model of Escherichia coli chorioamnionitis in rabbits.

Pregnant rabbits were treated with ciprofloxacin alone or with gentamicin in a model of Escherichia coli chorioamnionitis, and the results were compared with those for untreated rabbits. The survival rate increased and the bacteremia decreased significantly in treated fetuses in comparison to controls (P = 0.003). Nevertheless, rapid selection of resistant mutants is a major limit to ciprofloxacin applications.

In vivo efficacy of ceftaroline (PPI-0903), a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, compared with linezolid and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit endocarditis model.

Using the rabbit endocarditis model, we compared the activity of a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftaroline, with those of linezolid and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. After a 4-day treatment, ceftaroline exhibited superior bactericidal in vivo activity against resistant S. aureus strains and appeared to be the most effective drug against a heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus strain.

In vivo efficacy of moxifloxacin compared with cloxacillin and vancomycin in a Staphylococcus aureus rabbit arthritis experimental model.

We investigated the efficacies of moxifloxacin, cloxacillin, and vancomycin in a rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus arthritis. No significant difference between therapeutic regimens was observed after a 7-day treatment. Oral moxifloxacin could be a suitable alternative to standard parenteral therapy for S. aureus arthritis.

Eagle effect in Corynebacterium diphtheriae.

The in vivo relevance of the paradoxical bactericidal effect (the Eagle effect) is not evident. We found in vitro a paradoxical bactericidal effect of amoxicillin on 2 strains of nontoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Then, using an experimental rabbit model of endocarditis, we evaluated the in vivo relevance of this phenomenon. Rabbits were assigned to the following groups: no treatment (control group), continuous amoxicillin infusion simulating a dosage of 200 mg/kg/day in humans, and continuous amoxicillin infusion simulating a dosage of 20 mg/kg/day in humans. The low dosage (20 mg/kg/day) was significantly more effective than the high dosage (200 mg/kg/day) against both strains (P<.025), confirming the paradoxical bactericidal effect observed in vitro.

Activity of glycopeptides against Staphylococcus aureus infection in a rabbit endocarditis model: MICs do not predict in vivo efficacy.

The in vivo efficacy of vancomycin and teicoplanin against five Staphylococcus aureus strains with different susceptibilities to them and methicillin was studied. Rabbits were allocated at random to groups for endocarditis induction with one of these five strains and then treated for 2 days with vancomycin or teicoplanin. Each treated group was compared with a control group infected with the same strain. Vancomycin and teicoplanin showed similar activities. Low MICs did not predict better in vivo results.

In vivo efficacy of linezolid in combination with gentamicin for the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Indifference or even antagonism has mainly been reported with combinations including linezolid. The presence of in vitro antagonism is not always correlated with in vivo failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo activity of linezolid combined with gentamicin using a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endocarditis experimental model. A human-like pharmacokinetic simulation was used for linezolid and gentamicin to improve the extrapolation of the results to human therapy. Contrary to the antagonism previously described in vitro, linezolid combined with gentamicin exhibited bactericidal activity on the two strains with a decrease of at least 4 log(10)cfu/g of vegetation compared with controls. These data suggest that linezolid plus gentamicin could be an appropriate combination for the treatment of severe MRSA infections.

Comparison of in vivo intrinsic activity of cefepime and imipenem in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa rabbit endocarditis model: effect of combination with tobramycin simulating human serum pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this experimental study was first to compare the in vivo intrinsic activity of imipenem and cefepime administered as a continuous infusion and to determine their lowest effective serum steady-state concentration (LESSC). Secondly, we studied the effect of combining therapy with tobramycin. METHODS: In a Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) rabbit endocarditis model, beta-lactam antibiotics were administered by continuous infusion over a 24 h treatment period at different doses until the LESSC was reached, i.e. able to achieve a 2-log drop of cfu/g of vegetations versus untreated animals. The effect of adding tobramycin (3 mg/kg once daily) was then studied. RESULTS: The LESSC was between 3 x and 4 x MIC of cefepime for P. aeruginosa and about 0.2 5x MIC of imipenem. Combination of tobramycin with each of the two beta-lactams did not result in any further significant killing. CONCLUSION: The optimal Css/MIC ratio might differ from one molecule to another. The LESSC of imipenem is lower than that of cefepime, giving a better intrinsic activity in vivo, despite a higher MIC in vitro.

Combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin and gentamicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: experimental rabbit endocarditis study.

The combination of quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) and gentamicin was tested against two strains of gentamicin- and dalfopristin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). One strain was susceptible to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B type antibiotics (MLS(B)), and the other was constitutively resistant to these antibiotics by virtue of the ermA gene. The checkerboard method and time-kill curves showed that the combination of Q-D and gentamicin was indifferent. A rabbit endocarditis model simulated the pharmacokinetics achieved in humans receiving intravenous injections of Q-D (7.5 mg/kg of body weight three times a day) and gentamicin (3 mg/kg once daily). For the MLS(B)-susceptible strain, a 4-day regimen reduced mean bacterial titers (MBT) in vegetations from 8.5 +/- 0.8 log CFU/g (control group) to 4.1 +/- 2.6 (gentamicin), 3.0 +/- 0.9 (Q-D), and 2.6 +/- 0.5 log CFU/g (Q-D plus gentamicin). For the strain constitutively resistant to MLS(B), a 4-day regimen reduced MBT in vegetations from 8.7 +/- 0.9 log CFU/g (control group) to 5.0 +/- 2.2 (gentamicin), 5.2 +/- 2.2 (Q-D), and 5.1 +/- 2.4 log CFU/g (Q-D plus gentamicin). The differences between control and treatment groups were significant for both strains (P < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference between treatment groups. No resistant variant was isolated from vegetations, and no significant difference in MBT in vegetations of treatment groups after 1-day regimens was observed. This experimental study found no additive benefit in combining Q-D and gentamicin against dalfopristin- and gentamicin-susceptible MRSA.