Abdominal pain caused by lead toxicity due to over the counter herbal medicines: A case series.

In the last three decades, the use of herbal medications has been increasing for the treatment of various chronic disorders. Studies in the past have shown that many of these medicines could contain high levels of heavy metals, including lead. Therefore, we planned this study to evaluate the possibility of lead toxicity as the underlying cause in patients consuming these unnamed herbal medicines among patients presenting with significant abdominal pain. (Unexplained abdominal pain means pain in abdomen in which no etiology could be ascertained after all possible routine and specialized investigations including computerized axial tomography [CT] of the abdomen and upper gastrointestinal [UGI] endoscopy/colonoscopy). This is an observational case series of prospectively maintained data of all patients having unexplained abdominal pain and found to have an elevated blood lead level from 2011 to 2019. Lead toxicity was diagnosed when its blood lead level was >25 µg/dL. Total sixty-six patients with unexplained abdominal pain from 2011 to 2019 were recruited. Out of the sixty-six patients, seventeen had elevated blood lead levels. All seventeen patients had a history of ingestion of herbal medicines for more than 6 months. Among the seventeen patients, eight were taking it for infertility and sexual dysfunction, six for diabetes, two for arthritis and one for hypertension. Basophilic stippling was seen in one patient. Fourteen patients had low hemoglobin with a median value of 9.7 g/dL. Mean serum blood lead level was 87.1 µg/dL. None of them required anti-chelating agent. Lead toxicity owing to herbal medicine is not uncommon cause of unexplained abdominal pain. Most of these patients do not require a chelating agent for treatment. There is a need to bring these herbal medicines under strict regulations for displaying its constituents and their concentrations.

Mechanisms of Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Liver and Gut Injury.

Parenteral nutrition (PN) has revolutionized the care of patients with intestinal failure by providing nutrition intravenously. Worldwide, PN remains a standard tool of nutrition delivery in neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients. Though the benefits are evident, patients receiving PN can suffer serious cholestasis due to lack of enteral feeding and sometimes have fatal complications from liver injury and gut atrophy, including PN-associated liver disease or intestinal failure-associated liver disease. Recent studies into gut-systemic cross talk via the bile acid-regulated farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) axis, gut microbial control of the TGR5-glucagon-like peptide (GLP) axis, sepsis, and role of prematurity of hepatobiliary receptors are greatly broadening our understanding of PN-associated injury. It has also been shown that the composition of ω-6/ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids given parenterally as lipid emulsions can variably drive damage to hepatocytes and cell integrity. This manuscript reviews the mechanisms for the multifactorial pathogenesis of liver disease and gut injury with PN and discusses novel ameliorative strategies.

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating the effects of inorganic nitrate on vascular function, platelet reactivity and restenosis in stable angina: protocol of the NITRATE-OCT study.

INTRODUCTION: The mainstay treatment for reducing the symptoms of angina and long-term risk of heart attacks in patients with heart disease is stent implantation in the diseased coronary artery. While this procedure has revolutionised treatment, the incidence of secondary events remains a concern. These repeat events are thought to be due, in part, to continued enhanced platelet reactivity, endothelial dysfunction and ultimately restenosis of the stented artery. In this study, we will investigate whether a once a day inorganic nitrate administration might favourably modulate platelet reactivity and endothelial function leading to a decrease in restenosis. METHODS AND DESIGN: NITRATE-OCT is a double-blind, randomised, single-centre, placebo-controlled phase II trial that will enrol 246 patients with stable angina due to have elective percutaneous coronary intervention procedure with stent implantation. Patients will be randomised to receive 6 months of a once a day dose of either nitrate-rich beetroot juice or nitrate-deplete beetroot juice (placebo) starting up to 1 week before their procedure. The primary outcome is reduction of in-stent late loss assessed by quantitative coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography at 6 months. The study is powered to detect a 0.22±0.55 mm reduction in late loss in the treatment group compared with the placebo group. Secondary end points include change from baseline assessment of endothelial function measured using flow-mediated dilation at 6 months, target vessel revascularisation (TVR), restenosis rate (diameter>50%) and in-segment late loss at 6 months, markers of inflammation and platelet reactivity and major adverse cardiac events (ie, myocardial infarction, death, cerebrovascular accident, TVR) at 12 and 24 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (15/LO/0555). Trial results will be published according to the CONSORT statement and will be presented at conferences and reported in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02529189 and ISRCTN17373946, Pre-results.

Effect of slow- and fast-breathing exercises on autonomic functions in patients with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: Breathing exercises practiced in various forms of meditations such as yoga may influence autonomic functions. This may be the basis of therapeutic benefit to hypertensive patients. DESIGN: The study design was a randomized, prospective, controlled clinical study using three groups. SUBJECTS: The subjects comprised 60 male and female patients aged 20-60 years with stage 1 essential hypertension. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly and equally divided into the control and other two intervention groups, who were advised to do 3 months of slow-breathing and fast-breathing exercises, respectively. Baseline and postintervention recording of blood pressure (BP), autonomic function tests such as standing-to-lying ratio (S/L ratio), immediate heart rate response to standing (30:15 ratio), Valsalva ratio, heart rate variation with respiration (E/I ratio), hand-grip test, and cold pressor response were done in all subjects. RESULTS: Slow breathing had a stronger effect than fast breathing. BP decreased longitudinally over a 3-month period with both interventions. S/L ratio, 30:15 ratio, E/I ratio, and BP response in the hand grip and cold pressor test showed significant change only in patients practicing the slow-breathing exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Both types of breathing exercises benefit patients with hypertension. However, improvement in both the sympathetic and parasympathetic reactivity may be the mechanism that is associated in those practicing the slow-breathing exercise.

Real-world safety and efficacy of the endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent: early data from the E-Five Registry.

The E-Five is a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter global registry of patients receiving the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA) for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis. All consecutive procedures were included in the registry, without any specific anatomic or clinical exclusion criteria. Since October 2005, 8,318 patients have been enrolled in the E-Five Registry at 188 hospitals in Europe, South America, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia, and 10,343 lesions have been treated. The primary end point is the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year. Of the lesions treated, 60.3% were American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) type B2 or C lesions, and 16.5% were bifurcation stenoses. The average lesion length was 18.50 +/- 10.60 mm, and 50.6% of the lesions were > or =16 mm long. Clinical data have been analyzed for 1,989 of the patients (23.9%) receiving the Endeavor ZES in this registry, with 30-day clinical outcomes available for 1,985 of these 1,989 patients (99.8%). The acute procedure success rate in these patients was 98.6%, comparable with procedure success rates observed in previous Endeavor ZES clinical trials. The 30-day rate of MACE in these patients was just 1.7%, comparable with 30-day rates of MACE observed in previous ENDEAVOR clinical trials. In an early analysis of a subgroup of patients enrolled in the E-Five Registry, the Endeavor ZES demonstrated encouraging acute and 30-day outcomes in a real-world population of patients who underwent single-vessel or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.