Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 8(10): e021987, 2018 10 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30341117

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The interaction of the gut microbiota with the human host is implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and immunological diseases including ulcerative colitis (UC). Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a method of restoring gut microbial diversity is of increasing interest as a therapeutic approach in the management of UC. The current literature lacks consensus about the dose of FMT, route of administration and duration of response. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blinded randomised trial will explore the feasibility of FMT in 30 treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed distal UC limited to the recto-sigmoid region (up to 40 cm from the anal verge). This study aims to estimate the magnitude of treatment response to FMT under controlled conditions. The intervention (FMT) will be administered by rectal retention enema. It will test the feasibility of randomising patients to: (i) single FMT dose, (ii) five daily FMT doses or (iii) control (no FMT dose). All groups will receive standard antibiotic gut decontamination and bowel preparation before FMT. Recruitment will take place over a 24-month period with a 12-week patient follow-up. Trial objectives include evaluation of the magnitude of treatment response to FMT, investigation of the clinical value of metabolic phenotyping for predicting the clinical response to FMT and testing the recruitment rate of donors and patients for a study in FMT. This feasibility trial will enable an estimate of number of patients needed, help determine optimal study conditions and inform the choice of endpoints for a future definitive phase III study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the regional ethics committee and is sponsored by Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University's Health Board. Written informed consent from all patients will be obtained. Serious adverse events will be reported to the sponsor. Trial results will be disseminated via peer review publication and shared with trial participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 58082603; Pre-results.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Estudos de Viabilidade , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indução de Remissão , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Mutagenesis ; 23(5): 399-405, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18515815

RESUMO

Deoxycholic acid (DCA) is a secondary bile acid implicated in various cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In oesophageal adenocarcinoma, DCA is believed to contribute to carcinogenesis during reflux where stomach contents enter the lower oesophagus. It is imperative that we understand the mechanisms whereby oesophageal carcinogens function in order that therapeutic options may be developed. We have previously shown that DCA can damage chromosomes and does so through its generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We show here, after detailed experiments, that DCA appears to have a non-linear dose response for DNA damage. DCA induces DNA damage (as measured by the micronucleus assay) at doses of 100 microM and higher in oesophageal OE33 cells, but fails to induce such DNA damage below this cut-off dose. We also show that in terms of NF-kappaB activation (as measured by up-regulation of two NF-kappaB target genes) by DCA, a similar dose response is observed. This dose-response data may be important clinically as DCA exposure to the oesophagus may be used as a way to identify the 10% of Barrett's oesophagus patients currently progressing to cancer from the 90% of patients who do not progress. Only quantitative studies measuring DCA concentrations in refluxates correlated with histological progression will answer this question. We further show here that ROS are behind DCAs ability to activate NF-kappaB as antioxidants (epigallocatechin gallate, resveratrol and vitamin C) abrogate DCAs ability to up-regulate NF-kappaB-controlled genes. In conclusion, low doses of DCA appear to be less biologically significant in vitro. If this were to be confirmed in vivo, it might suggest that reflux patients with low DCA concentrations may be at a lower risk of cancer progression compared to patients with high levels of DCA in their refluxate. Either way, antioxidant supplementation may possibly help prevent the deleterious effects of DCA in the whole GI tract.


Assuntos
Dano ao DNA , DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácido Desoxicólico/toxicidade , Esôfago/efeitos dos fármacos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/induzido quimicamente , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Esôfago de Barrett/complicações , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/induzido quimicamente , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/genética , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Esôfago/metabolismo , Esôfago/patologia , Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Testes para Micronúcleos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA