Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 77(12): 2008-13, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24140395

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of a new habilitation approach, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention using a voice output communication aid (VOCA), in improving speech perception, speech production, receptive vocabulary skills, and communicative behaviors in children with cochlear implants (CIs) who had multiple disabilities. METHODS: Five children with mental retardation and/or cerebral palsy who had used CIs over two years were included in this study. Five children in the control group were matched to children who had AAC intervention on the basis of the type/severity of their additional disabilities and chronological age. They had limited oral communication skills after cochlear implantation because of their limited cognition and oromotor function. The children attended the AAC intervention with parents once a week for 6 months. We evaluated their performance using formal tests, including the monosyllabic word tests, the articulation test, and the receptive vocabulary test. We also assessed parent-child interactions. We analyzed the data using a one-group pretest and posttest design. RESULTS: The mean scores of the formal tests performed in these children improved from 26% to 48% in the phoneme scores of the monosyllabic word tests, from 17% to 35% in the articulation test, and from 11 to 18.4 in the receptive vocabulary test after AAC intervention (all p < .05). Some children in the control group showed improvement in the speech perception, speech production, and receptive vocabulary tests for 6 months, but the differences did not achieve statistical significance (all p > .05). The frequency of spontaneous communicative behaviors (i.e., vocalization, gestures, and words) and imitative words significantly increased after AAC intervention (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: AAC intervention using a VOCA was very useful and effective on improving communicative skills in children with multiple disabilities who had very limited oral communication skills after cochlear implantation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/reabilitação , Implantes Cocleares , Auxiliares de Comunicação para Pessoas com Deficiência , Surdez/cirurgia , Crianças com Deficiência/reabilitação , Anormalidades Múltiplas/diagnóstico , Anormalidades Múltiplas/terapia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Paralisia Cerebral/complicações , Paralisia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Paralisia Cerebral/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Implante Coclear/métodos , Surdez/complicações , Surdez/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Deficiência Intelectual/complicações , Deficiência Intelectual/diagnóstico , Deficiência Intelectual/terapia , Desenvolvimento da Linguagem , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Percepção da Fala , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Otol Neurotol ; 33(7): 1105-12, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22892802

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Older adults often have more difficulty understanding speech than younger adults do, particularly in the presence of noise. Such age-related speech perception difficulties may be related to declines in central auditory processing. Additionally, it has been hypothesized that impaired auditory processing might be related to neural dysynchrony. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of stimulus intensity and noise on the N1-P2 response in younger and older normal-hearing adults. METHODS: Eight younger and 8 older normal-hearing adults participated in this study. Brief 100-ms tones (1.0 kHz, 100-60 dB SPL) in quiet and in continuous broadband noise (70 dB SPL) were used to evoke the N1-P2 responses. The N1-P2 components were analyzed as a function of stimulus intensity in both groups. RESULTS: N1 latencies to tones in quiet for older adults were delayed only at 60 dB SPL compared with those for younger adults. Additionally, N1 latencies to tones in noise were prolonged in older adults compared with those in younger adults even at 70 dB SPL (SNR = 0). No significant age effects were observed for the P2 latencies and N1-P2 amplitudes between the groups. CONCLUSION: N1 latency to tones with lower intensity and noise were delayed in older adults compared with those in younger adults. These stimulus intensity and noise issues can affect synchronized neural activity underlying the auditory processing and may provide a partial explanation for the difficulties shown by older adults in understanding speech.


Assuntos
Estimulação Acústica/métodos , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Córtex Auditivo/fisiologia , Percepção Auditiva/fisiologia , Potenciais Evocados Auditivos/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruído , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA