Indigo naturalis (Qing dai) for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Indigo naturalis (Qing dai) is a traditional therapy reported to be useful in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially for ulcerative colitis. We performed a systematic review of its efficacy and safety in IBD. METHODS: Electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus) were searched on 4th March 2023 to identify reports about the use of indigo naturalis in IBD. We extracted data with respect to clinical response, remission, endoscopic and histological responses, and adverse events with the use of indigo naturalis in IBD. Pooled clinical response rates and remission rates were calculated. The quality of studies was assessed using Joanna-Briggs tools. RESULTS: Nine studies reporting on 299 patients were included. The pooled clinical response rate was 0.796 (95 %CI, 0.7465-0.8379, I2=0), and the clinical remission rate in ulcerative colitis was 0.668 (0.488- 0.809, I2=85.2 %). The pooled relative risk of clinical response was higher in the indigo naturalis group as compared to placebo in the two randomized trials [3.82 (2.04; 7.14, I2=0)]. Except for one reversible pulmonary arterial hypertension case, most reported adverse effects were mild. The endoscopic and histological responses, when reported, suggested that indigo naturalis is effective for ulcerative colitis. The limitations of the systematic review included a small number of randomized studies, reports only from East Asia and a relatively small number of patients, especially for Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: Indigo naturalis is effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Future studies should evaluate the comparative efficacy with other drugs.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Translational data suggest a potential role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy and safety of HBOT in IBD. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Embase and CENTRAL to identify studies reporting the efficacy of HBOT in ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. We pooled the response rates for HBOT in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease separately. RESULTS: A total 18 studies were included in the systematic review and 16 in the analysis. The overall response rate of HBOT in ulcerative colitis was 83.24% (95% confidence interval: 61.90-93.82), while the response in Crohn's disease was 81.89 (76.72-86.11). The results of randomized trials for HBOT as adjuvant therapy in ulcerative colitis were conflicting. The complete healing of fistula in fistulizing Crohn's disease was noted 47.64% (22.05-74.54), while partial healing was noted in 34.29% (17.33-56.50%). Most of the adverse events were minor. CONCLUSION: Observational studies suggest benefit of use of HBOT in ulcerative colitis flares and Crohn's disease. However, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to draw a definite conclusion.