Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 106(3): 322-6, 2012 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22271524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy is the major treatment modality for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) liver metastases. We investigated the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment, which has not been well explored in this disease. METHODS: One-hundred and thirty-four cases of NPC with liver metastases treated with chemotherapy, chemotherapy with RFA, or RFA alone were retrospectively analyzed. Patient survival was evaluated by the log-rank test. Survival was analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox multivariate analyses of clinicopathological features and different treatment approaches were conducted. RESULTS: Local response rates were 58% in the RFA group, 78% in the chemotherapy group and 93% in the chemotherapy with RFA group (P < 0.001). Increased progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed in the chemotherapy with RFA group (P < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that the number of liver metastases (1 vs. >1), the dimension of the largest liver metastases (≤3 cm vs. >3 cm), evaluation of treatment (response vs. no response) and disease-free survival (≤12 months vs. >12 months) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: RFA combined with chemotherapy is a promising treatment for NPC metastatic liver disease with improved local response, PFS, and OS compared to current chemotherapy protocols.


Assuntos
Carcinoma/patologia , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Ai Zheng ; 28(9): 913-8, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19728906

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine are main active agents for advanced colorectal cancer. FORFIRI regimen is recommended for the patients who were treated with oxaliplatin plus 5-FU or capecitabine previously. This study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of FORFIRI regimen in treating advanced colorectal cancer failing to prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and analyze the impacts of clinical factors on the responses. METHODS: A total of 90 patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma, who had received prior adjuvant FOLFOX6 regimen and progressed within 12 months after the completion of therapy or had no response to prior FOLFOX6/CapeOX regimen as first-line therapy, were treated with FORFIRI regimen. The efficacy and adverse events were observed. RESULTS: Of the 81 evaluable patients, two achieved complete remission, 20 achieved partial remission and 34 had stable disease. The overall response rate was 27.2% and disease control rate was 69.1%. The median time to progression was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.9-8.8 months) and median overall survival time was 18.8 months (95% CI, 17.5-20.2 months). The main adverse events time were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, alopecia, fatigue, impaired liver function, oral mucositis and diarrhea. Grade III adverse events included alopecia in 15 patients (16.7%), vomiting in 10 patients (11.1%), nausea in eight patients (8.9%), neutropenia in five patients (5.6%), impaired liver function in two patients (2.2%) and oral mucositis in two patients (2.2%). CONCLUSION: FOLFIRI regimen is effective and well-tolerated as salvage therapy for advanced colorectal cancer failing to prior FOLFOX6/CapeOX regimen, and thus can be used widely.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Irinotecano , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Indução de Remissão , Terapia de Salvação , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Adulto Jovem
3.
Ai Zheng ; 23(12): 1666-70, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15601557

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: H101 is an E1B-55 kDa gene-deleted replication-selective adenovirus, which showed a significant antitumor activity. This study was to compare effects and toxicities of intratumoral H101 injection combined with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) regimen or adriamycin plus 5-fluorouracil (AF) regimen versus PF or AF regimen alone in treating patients with head and neck or esophagus squamous cell cancer. METHODS: A total of 160 patients were recruited. PF regimen (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients have no history of PF chemotherapy,or sensitive to PF chemotherapy,while AF regimen (adriamycin 50 mg/m(2) iv,d1; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients didn't response to PF regimen. All patients were randomized to either receive intratumoral H101 injection (5.0 x 10(11)-1.5 x 10(12) VP/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks) or not. Treatment repeated every 3 weeks,all patients have to receive at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 123 accordant patients,overall response rate of PF plus H101 group (group A1) was 78.8% (41/52),of PF alone group (group B1) was 39.6% (21/53),of AF plus H101 group (group A2) was 50.0% (7/14),of AF alone group (group B2) was 50.0% (2/4). Differences of response rates between group A1 and group B1,between group A1+A2 and group B1+B2 were significant (P=0.000). Main side effects were fever (45.7%), injection site reaction (28.3%),and influenza-like symptoms (9.8%). CONCLUSION: Intratumoral H101 injection showed a distinct efficacy in patients with squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus,and was relatively safe.


Assuntos
Adenoviridae/fisiologia , Proteínas E1B de Adenovirus/deficiência , Terapia Biológica , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Adenoviridae/genética , Proteínas E1B de Adenovirus/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Terapia Biológica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA