Safety and impact of peripheral parenteral nutrition on nutrient delivery in patients with nutrition risk: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients and strategies to improve energy and protein intake have a positive impact on outcome. Despite early evidence suggesting the usefulness of peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN), its adoption has been hampered by concerns regarding safety and efficacy. This study addresses this issue. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in medical and surgical inpatients in who were screened for nutrition risk and assessed using Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Data captured included nutrition status, energy and protein requirements, intravenous access, indications for PPN, use of supplemental micronutrients, and disposition of patients on PPN. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were recruited from two centers over 8 months. The average age was 61.5 years, the mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4.21 (±3.09), 52% were male, and 48% were admitted to medicine, whereas 52% were admitted to surgery. Thirty-three percent of patients were SGA C, 44% were SGA B, and 19% were SGA A. Twenty-seven percent of patients had cancer. The average length of hospital stay was 22 days. The main indications for PPN were gastrointestinal tract dysfunction (72%) and postsurgical status (16%). PPN provided an average of 1296 kcal (±191) and 46 g of protein (±7). Intravenous access complications in patients receiving PPN did not occur in excess of expected. Almost 40% of patients required transition to central PN. CONCLUSIONS: PPN is a safe, effective way to deliver supplemental protein, energy, and micronutrients to malnourished patients and supports transition to other modes of nutrition care.

Effect of Discontinuation of Manganese Supplementation From Home Parenteral Nutrition Solutions on Whole-Blood Levels and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain: A 5-Year Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Manganese (Mn) is included in current premixed multiple trace element (TE) additives for home parenteral nutrition (HPN). However, there is a risk of oversupplementation of Mn due to contamination from PN additives. Oversupplementation can produce Mn toxicity with neurologic symptoms and abnormalities on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In 2009, we reported that whole-blood Mn levels were above the upper limit of normal in 16 HPN patients, with 81% having MRI findings. Subsequently, we removed Mn supplementation from all our HPN patients. We present a 5-year follow-up here. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study on 11 of the surviving 16 patients on HPN. All patients had Mn removed from PN and had yearly monitoring of blood Mn levels. Eight patients had a repeat MRI to evaluate for resolution of basal ganglia deposits. Patient demography, clinical history, and bloodwork were recorded. RESULTS: Five of 6 patients who initially had elevated Mn levels had normal levels on follow-up. All patients who had Mn levels measured serially had a decrease in levels; the mean percent decrease of Mn was 38.1% (range, 10.1%-53.8%). Two patients had elevated Mn despite the absence of supplementation. Six of 8 patients who had repeat MRIs had complete resolution abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of Mn as an additive in HPN solutions resulted in resolution of MRI abnormalities in most patients. Over 5 years, all patients except for 1 maintained normal blood Mn levels. Therefore, Mn levels should be monitored and supplementation be individualized.

Trace Elements in Parenteral Nutrition: Considerations for the Prescribing Clinician.

Trace elements (TEs) are an essential component of parenteral nutrition (PN). Over the last few decades, there has been increased experience with PN, and with this knowledge more information about the management of trace elements has become available. There is increasing awareness of the effects of deficiencies and toxicities of certain trace elements. Despite this heightened awareness, much is still unknown in terms of trace element monitoring, the accuracy of different assays, and current TE contamination of solutions. The supplementation of TEs is a complex and important part of the PN prescription. Understanding the role of different disease states and the need for reduced or increased doses is essential. Given the heterogeneity of the PN patients, supplementation should be individualized.