Effects of unilateral eye closure on middle ear muscle contractions.

Middle ear muscle contractions (MEMCs) are most commonly considered a response to high-level acoustic stimuli. However, MEMCs have also been observed in the absence of sound, either as a response to somatosensory stimulation or in concert with other motor activity. The relationship between MEMCs and non-acoustic sources is unclear. This study examined associations between measures of voluntary unilateral eye closure and impedance-based measures indicative of middle ear muscle activity while controlling for demographic and clinical factors in a large group of participants (N=190) with present clinical acoustic reflexes and no evidence of auditory dysfunction. Participants were instructed to voluntarily close the eye ipsilateral to the ear canal containing a detection probe at three levels of effort. Orbicularis oculi muscle activity was measured using surface electromyography. Middle ear muscle activity was inferred from changes in total energy reflected in the ear canal using a filtered (0.2 to 8 kHz) click train. Results revealed that middle ear muscle activity was positively associated with eye muscle activity. MEMC occurrence rates for eye closure observed in this study were generally higher than previously published rates for high-level brief acoustic stimuli in the same participant pool suggesting that motor activity may be a more reliable elicitor of MEMCs than acoustic stimuli. These results suggest motor activity can serve as a confounding factor for auditory exposure studies as well as complicate the interpretation of any impulsive noise damage risk criteria that assume MEMCs serve as a consistent, uniform protective factor. The mechanism linking eye and middle ear muscle activity is not understood and is an avenue for future research.

Generalizability of clinically measured acoustic reflexes to brief sounds.

Middle ear muscle contractions (MEMC) can be elicited in response to high-level sounds, and have been used clinically as acoustic reflexes (ARs) during evaluations of auditory system integrity. The results of clinical AR evaluations do not necessarily generalize to different signal types or durations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of observing MEMC in response to brief sound stimuli (tones, recorded gunshots, noise) in adult participants (N = 190) exhibiting clinical ARs and excellent hearing sensitivity. Results revealed that the presence of clinical ARs was not a sufficient indication that listeners will also exhibit MEMC for brief sounds. Detection rates varied across stimulus types between approximately 20% and 80%. Probabilities of observing MEMC also differed by clinical AR magnitude and latency, and declined over the period of minutes during the course of the MEMC measurement series. These results provide no support for the inclusion of MEMC as a protective factor in damage-risk criteria for impulsive noises, and the limited predictability of whether a given individual will exhibit MEMC in response to a brief sound indicates a need to measure and control for MEMC in studies evaluating pharmaceutical interventions for hearing loss.

Human middle-ear muscles rarely contract in anticipation of acoustic impulses: Implications for hearing risk assessments.

The current study addressed the existence of an anticipatory middle-ear muscle contraction (MEMC) as a protective mechanism found in recent damage-risk criteria for impulse noise exposure. Specifically, the experiments reported here tested instances when an exposed individual was aware of and could anticipate the arrival of an acoustic impulse. In order to detect MEMCs in human subjects, a laser-Doppler vibrometer (LDV) was used to measure tympanic membrane (TM) motion in response to a probe tone. Here we directly measured the time course and relative magnitude changes of TM velocity in response to an acoustic reflex-eliciting (i.e. MEMC eliciting) impulse in 59 subjects with clinically assessable MEMCs. After verifying the presence of the MEMC, we used a classical conditioning paradigm pairing reflex-eliciting acoustic impulses (unconditioned stimulus, UCS) with various preceding stimuli (conditioned stimulus, CS). Changes in the time-course of the MEMC following conditioning were considered evidence of MEMC conditioning, and any indication of an MEMC prior to the onset of the acoustic elicitor was considered an anticipatory response. Nine subjects did not produce a MEMC measurable via LDV. For those subjects with an observable MEMC (n = 50), 48 subjects (96%) did not show evidence of an anticipatory response after conditioning, whereas only 2 subjects (4%) did. These findings reveal that MEMCs are not readily conditioned in most individuals, suggesting that anticipatory MEMCs are not prevalent within the general population. The prevalence of anticipatory MEMCs does not appear to be sufficient to justify inclusion as a protective mechanism in auditory injury risk assessments.

Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.

Sensory performance is constrained by the information in the stimulus and the precision of the involved sensory system(s). Auditory spatial acuity is robust across a broad range of sound frequencies and source locations, but declines at eccentric lateral angles. The basis of such variation is not fully understood. Low-frequency auditory spatial acuity is mediated by sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) cues. While low-frequency spatial acuity varies across azimuth and some physiological models predict strong medial bias in the precision of ITD sensitivity, human psychophysical ITD sensitivity appears to vary only slightly with reference ITD magnitude. Correspondingly, recent analyses suggest that spatial variation in human low-frequency acuity is well-accounted for by acoustic factors alone. Here we examine the matter of high-frequency auditory acuity, which is mediated by sensitivity to interaural level difference (ILD) cues. Using two different psychophysical tasks in human subjects, we demonstrate decreasing ILD acuity with increasing ILD magnitude. We then demonstrate that the multiplicative combination of spatially variant sensory precision and physical cue information (local slope of the ILD cue) provides improved prediction of classic high-frequency spatial acuity data. Finally, we consider correlates of magnitude dependent acuity in neurons that are sensitive to ILDs.

Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Normal-hearing human listeners and a variety of studied animal species localize sound sources accurately in reverberant environments by responding to the directional cues carried by the first-arriving sound rather than spurious cues carried by later-arriving reflections, which are not perceived discretely. This phenomenon is known as the precedence effect (PE) in sound localization. Despite decades of study, the biological basis of the PE remains unclear. Though the PE was once widely attributed to central processes such as synaptic inhibition in the auditory midbrain, a more recent hypothesis holds that the PE may arise essentially as a by-product of normal cochlear function. Here we evaluated the PE in a unique human patient population with demonstrated sensitivity to binaural information but without functional cochleae. Users of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) were tested in a psychophysical task that assessed the number and location(s) of auditory images perceived for simulated source-echo (lead-lag) stimuli. A parallel experiment was conducted in a group of normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Key findings were as follows: 1) Subjects in both groups exhibited lead-lag fusion. 2) Fusion was marginally weaker in CI users than in NH listeners but could be augmented by systematically attenuating the amplitude of the lag stimulus to coarsely simulate adaptation observed in acoustically stimulated auditory nerve fibers. 3) Dominance of the lead in localization varied substantially among both NH and CI subjects but was evident in both groups. Taken together, data suggest that aspects of the PE can be elicited in CI users, who lack functional cochleae, thus suggesting that neural mechanisms are sufficient to produce the PE.

Sound pressure transformations by the head and pinnae of the adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera).

There are three main cues to sound location: the interaural differences in time (ITD) and level (ILD) as well as the monaural spectral shape cues. These cues are generated by the spatial- and frequency-dependent filtering of propagating sound waves by the head and external ears. Although the chinchilla has been used for decades to study the anatomy, physiology, and psychophysics of audition, including binaural and spatial hearing, little is actually known about the sound pressure transformations by the head and pinnae and the resulting sound localization cues available to them. Here, we measured the directional transfer functions (DTFs), the directional components of the head-related transfer functions, for 9 adult chinchillas. The resulting localization cues were computed from the DTFs. In the frontal hemisphere, spectral notch cues were present for frequencies from ∼6-18 kHz. In general, the frequency corresponding to the notch increased with increases in source elevation as well as in azimuth towards the ipsilateral ear. The ILDs demonstrated a strong correlation with source azimuth and frequency. The maximum ILDs were <10 dB for frequencies <5 kHz, and ranged from 10-30 dB for the frequencies >5 kHz. The maximum ITDs were dependent on frequency, yielding 236 µs at 4 kHz and 336 µs at 250 Hz. Removal of the pinnae eliminated the spectral notch cues, reduced the acoustic gain and the ILDs, altered the acoustic axis, and reduced the ITDs.