RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, general practice in Australia underwent a rapid transition, including the roll-out of population-wide telehealth, with uncertain impacts on GP use and costs. AIM: To describe how use and costs of GP services changed in 2020 - following the COVID-19 pandemic and introduction of telehealth - compared with 2019, and how this varied across population subgroups. DESIGN AND SETTING: Linked-data analysis of whole-population data for Australia. METHOD: Multi-Agency Data Integration Project data for â¼19 million individuals from the 2016 census were linked to Medicare data for 2019-2020. Regression models were used to compare age- and sex-adjusted GP use and out-of-pocket costs over time, overall, and by sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Of the population, 85.5% visited a GP in Q2-Q4 2020, compared with 89.5% in the same period of 2019. The mean number of face-to-face GP services per quarter declined, while telehealth services increased; overall use of GP services in Q4 2020 was similar to, or higher than, that of Q4 2019 for most groups. The proportion of total GP services by telehealth stabilised at 23.5% in Q4 2020. However, individuals aged 3-14 years, ≥70 years, and those with limited English proficiency used fewer GP services in 2020 compared with 2019, with a lower proportion by telehealth, compared with the rest of the population. Mean out-of-pocket costs per service were lower across all subgroups in 2020 compared with 2019. CONCLUSION: The introduction of widespread telehealth maintained the use of GP services during the COVID-19 pandemic and minimised out-of-pocket costs, but not for all population subgroups.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Medicina Geral , Telemedicina , Humanos , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , PandemiasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) is a common surgical intervention for chronic lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Little large-scale evidence exists on factors related to receipt of non-cancer-related TURP. METHODS: A prospective study of men aged ≥45â years participating in the 45 and Up Study, a large Australian cohort study, without prior prostatectomy and/or bowel/genital/urinary-tract cancer; questionnaire data were linked to hospitalisations and deaths. HRs for TURP were estimated in relation to multiple factors, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: There were 3416 incident TURPs among 106â 769 men (median follow-up 5.8â years), with rates of 1.8, 5.3, 9.1 and 11.4/1000 person-years for ages 45-54, 55-64, 65-74 and ≥75â years, respectively. Age-adjusted rates of TURP varied markedly according to baseline LUTS from 2.2/1000 person-years with no/mild symptoms to 30.7/1000 person-years with severe symptoms. Annual household income ≥$70â 000 versus <$20â 000, having private health insurance and living in major cities were associated with higher TURP rates; there were no significant differences according to baseline diabetes, stroke, high blood pressure or cardiovascular disease. Men reporting severe versus no physical functioning limitation, high versus low psychological distress or poor versus excellent self-rated health were 36-51% more likely to undergo procedures overall, but were 24-37% less likely to undergo procedures following additional adjustment for need (baseline LUTS). CONCLUSIONS: TURP rates were most strongly related to baseline LUTS and age, consistent with appropriate health services targeting. Lower TURP rates in men experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage and with poor health/disability, after accounting for baseline LUTS, suggest inequity and factors such as frailty and risks related to surgery.
Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/fisiopatologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the rapid advances in information technology in the last decade, various diabetes information systems have evolved in different parts of the world. Availability of new technologies and information systems for monitoring and treating diabetes is critical to achieving recommended metabolic control, including glycosylated hemoglobin levels. The first step is to develop a registry, including a patient identifier that can link multiple data sources, which can then serve as a springboard to electronic mechanisms for practitioners to gain information on performance and results. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to review the provisions for diabetes surveillance in different parts of the world. This is a systematic review of national and regional information systems for diabetes surveillance. LITERATURE REVIEW: A comprehensive review was undertaken using Medline literature review, internet search using the Google search engine, and e-mail consultation with opinion leaders. TOPICS REVIEW: National/regional-level diabetes surveillance systems in Europe, the United States, Australia/New Zealand, and Asia have been reviewed. State-of-the-art diabetes information systems linking multiple data sources, with extensive audit and feedback capabilities, have also been looked at. RESULTS: National/regional-level audit databases have been tabulated. Diabetes information systems linking multiple data sources have been described. Most of the developed countries have now implemented systems such as diabetes registers and audits for diabetes surveillance in at least some regions, if not nationally. Developing nations are beginning to recognize the need for chronic disease management. CONCLUSIONS: With the advancements in information technology, the diabetes registers have the potential to rise beyond their traditional functions with dynamic data integration, decision support, and data access, as demonstrated by some diabetes information systems. With the rapid pace of development in electronic health records and health information systems, countries that are beginning to build their health information technology infrastructure could benefit from planning and funding along these lines.